Smuggler Archive
Thread: Is sliceing really as random as they say.
DrevenStrobe
Wed Jan 12, 2005 12:20 pm
#92
ana-mo-cara wrote:
Its just spinning out of control at this point aint it atleast we are seeing some interesting thoughts now. Instead of people that have a nervous disorder.
I just see a bunch of people making fun of you...
But, I guess we all see what we want to see...
yimaz
Wed Jan 12, 2005 12:22 pm
#93
DrevenStrobe wrote:
ana-mo-cara wrote:
Its just spinning out of control at this point aint it atleast we are seeing some interesting thoughts now. Instead of people that have a nervous disorder.
I just see a bunch of people making fun of you...
But, I guess we all see what we want to see...
Thochkored
Wed Jan 12, 2005 12:27 pm
#94
OMG! He's on to us. I can predict slicing! Asa Master Smuggler, everytime I slice a weapon I either get Speed or Damage and it always is between 15%-35%. I can predict that every single time. It is a bit different with Armor, I can predictthat it will be anEffectiveness slice or and Encumbrance Slice. The Effectiveness slice can be predictedto land between 11%-35% and an Encumbrance slice to land (get this) between 20% and 45%. Hey the numbers don't lie, even you can safely predict these result for your clients everytime.
Maxil
Wed Jan 12, 2005 4:53 pm
#95
ana-mo-cara just knows everything I guess.
/sarcasm
You just keep going on everything till we give up, don't you...
/sarcasm
You just keep going on everything till we give up, don't you...
Fernas
Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:22 pm
#96
sliced two weapons.
5% then 32%
i don't see how this fits the pattern. of course, i suck at math. 
oh, wait, slicing is random. i knew that.
Maxil
Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:41 pm
#98
never had a 5 but had a 6 once...while master, thankfully it was on somethun I had a crate of *shrug*
Albve
Wed Jan 12, 2005 6:09 pm
#99
ana-mo-cara wrote:
These are empirical results If I am getting a one hundred percent approximation that tells me I am on to something. Even if this is not the exact system they are useing its so damn close its uncanny.
Go ahead guys try it out for yourselves and see.
The reason you guys are not seeing the patern is the number layout 1 1 2 3 5 8 1 3 4 7 1 1. Looks random to me. If it looked like a pattern it would be useless
Classic.
CabbageHead
Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:03 pm
#100
Fernas wrote:
sorry, 7%. still the same thing though.
Really? I thought 15% was the lowest. Learn something new every day.
Maxil
Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:09 pm
#102
DrevenStrobe wrote:
ana-mo-cara wrote:
lol apparently. You see his ratings? apparently he pissed someone off
zazo
Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:16 pm
#103
yeeessss yesss there is a pattern there i see it now
*dodges Caylin's blaster fire*
no no I see it its....
plaid I think?
plaid I think?
Planeseeker
Thu Jan 13, 2005 3:04 pm
#104
ana-mo-cara wrote:
Okay this is pretty amazeing ask a question and get 100 replies.
Yeah, funny...weird for a forum...
Graby