Shipwright Archive

---

1. I would like to see increased factory support. No. I think we're good with what we have.


2. I would like to see Shipwright trainers in Player Cities. YES!


3. I would like to be able to convert Shipwright XP into Force Crafting XP. Indifferent.


4. I would like to see increased returns from experimenting. On components, yes.


5. I believe resource quality does not have enough effect on item stats. No.


6. Mark V masses are too high. No.


7. Droid Interfaces/Flight Computers:




• I would like to see Droid Interfaces moved to Droid Engineer.


8. Player City Ship Access:




• I would like to see a Player City starport. Yes. It would be an excellent reward for Rank 5 cities.


• I would like to see a Player City starship terminal. As above.


9. I think decay is:




• Just right.
  

---

---

styx66 wrote:

Since I'm going to be running this profession community in the fairest manner possible, I'd like to get a comprehensive community opinion on these issues. At this time, I think a simple majority will put an issue on the list, while a 2/3's majority will make it a pressing issue.

Please limit your response to a simple quote and answer. If you would like to discuss why you have voted a certain way, or read why other people are voting certain ways in order to become more informed on these issues, please visit the poll discussion thread.

---

1. I would like to see increased factory support. Yes


2. I would like to see Shipwright trainers in Player Cities. Yes (but low priority)


3. I would like to be able to convert Shipwright XP into Force Crafting XP. Yes (but low priority)


4. I would like to see increased returns from experimenting. No (I think it's fine as is)


5. I believe resource quality does not have enough effect on item stats. Agree


6. Mark V masses are too high. Disagree


7. Droid Interfaces/Flight Computers:




• I would like to see Flight Computers moved to Shipwright. Disagree


• OR


• I would like to see Droid Interfaces moved to Droid Engineer. Disagree


8. Player City Ship Access:




• I would like to see a Player City starport. No (Would take up much to much space)


• I would like to see a Player City starship terminal. Yes


9. I think decay is:




• Too high.


• Just right. X


• Too low.

Message Edited by styx66 on 11-08-2004 06:11 AM

---

1. I would like to see increased factory support. No.


2. I would like to see Shipwright trainers in Player Cities. Yes.


3. I would like to be able to convert Shipwright XP into Force Crafting XP. Yes.


4. I would like to see increased returns from experimenting. Yes.


5. I believe resource quality does not have enough effect on item stats. No.


6. Mark V masses are too high. Yes.


7. Droid Interfaces/Flight Computers:




• I would like to see Flight Computers moved to Shipwright.


• OR


• I would like to see Droid Interfaces moved to Droid Engineer. None of the above.


8. Player City Ship Access:




• I would like to see a Player City starport.


• I would like to see a Player City starship terminal. ***


9. I think decay is:




• Too high.


• Just right. Can't really say, I havn't gotten a good look at decay, havn't paid attention to it.


• Too low.

Message Edited by styx66 on 11-08-2004 06:11 AM

---

1. I would like to see increased factory support. NO


2. I would like to see Shipwright trainers in Player Cities. EH


3. I would like to be able to convert Shipwright XP into Force Crafting XP. YES


4. I would like to see increased returns from experimenting. YES


5. I believe resource quality does not have enough effect on item stats. NO


6. Mark V masses are too high. NO


7. Droid Interfaces/Flight Computers:




• As Is


8. Player City Ship Access:




• I would like to see a Player City starport. NO


• I would like to see a Player City starship terminal. YES


9. I think decay is:




• Just right.

---

styx66 wrote:

1. I would like to see increased factory support. Yes I do but only after a few months... give everyone a change to get off the ground


2. I would like to see Shipwright trainers in Player Cities. Yes


3. I would like to be able to convert Shipwright XP into Force Crafting XP. Yes


4. I would like to see increased returns from experimenting. Yes


5. I believe resource quality does not have enough effect on item stats. Yes


6. Mark V masses are too high. Yes, Yes, Yes


7. Droid Interfaces/Flight Computers:




• I would like to see Flight Computers moved to Shipwright.


• OR


• I would like to see Droid Interfaces moved to Droid Engineer.


8. Player City Ship Access:




• I would like to see a Player City starport.


• I would like to see a Player City starship terminal.


9. I think decay is:




• Too high.


• Just right.


• Too low.

Message Edited by styx66 on 11-08-2004 06:11 AM

---

1. I would like to see increased factory support. No, I think the way it is now is right


2. I would like to see Shipwright trainers in Player Cities. No, having to go into the big city seems to make more sense to me


3. I would like to be able to convert Shipwright XP into Force Crafting XP. Yes


4. I would like to see increased returns from experimenting. Yes


5. I believe resource quality does not have enough effect on item stats. No, I don't believe this


6. Mark V masses are too high. Yes, the way Mark IV masses are now, I can barely even fit one Mark IV component in my ship


7. Droid Interfaces/Flight Computers:




• I would like to see Flight Computers moved to Shipwright. Yes


• OR


• I would like to see Droid Interfaces moved to Droid Engineer.


8. Player City Ship Access:




• I would like to see a Player City starport. Yes, but would have to be a darn big Player City


• I would like to see a Player City starship terminal.


9. I think decay is:




• Too high.


• Just right. Yes


• Too low.

---

styx66 wrote:

Since I'm going to be running this profession community in the fairest manner possible, I'd like to get a comprehensive community opinion on these issues. At this time, I think a simple majority will put an issue on the list, while a 2/3's majority will make it a pressing issue.

Please limit your response to a simple quote and answer. If you would like to discuss why you have voted a certain way, or read why other people are voting certain ways in order to become more informed on these issues, please visit the poll discussion thread.

---

1. I would like to see increased factory support. No
2. I would like to see Shipwright trainers in Player Cities. Yes
3. I would like to be able to convert Shipwright XP into Force Crafting XP. No
4. I would like to see increased returns from experimenting. Yes
5. I believe resource quality does not have enough effect on item stats. Yes on Components, chassis fine
6. Mark V masses are too high. No-these are MP ship components
7. Droid Interfaces/Flight Computers: Why is this an issue? Keep it as is.
• I would like to see Flight Computers moved to Shipwright. No
• OR
• I would like to see Droid Interfaces moved to Droid Engineer. No
8. Player City Ship Access:
• I would like to see a Player City starport. No-breathes life back into NPC cities
• I would like to see a Player City starship terminal. No-same as above,except maybe smugglers
9. I think decay is:
• Too high. No
• Just right. Yes
• Too low. No

Message Edited by styx66 on 11-08-2004 06:11 AM

---

---

styx66 wrote:

---

1. I would like to see increased factory support. No


2. I would like to see Shipwright trainers in Player Cities. No


3. I would like to be able to convert Shipwright XP into Force Crafting XP. Yes, approximately equal to architect or better.


4. I would like to see increased returns from experimenting. Yes, I should not have to have that much competition from the loot drops. I should be the one people come to for the best items generally.


5. I believe resource quality does not have enough effect on item stats. No


6. Mark V masses are too high. Yes, experimentation does little to help with these items either.


7. Droid Interfaces/Flight Computers: (being both, this is a VERY tough call, but here is what I think)




• I would like to see Flight Computers moved to Shipwright. No


• OR


• I would like to see Droid Interfaces moved to Droid Engineer. Yes


8. Player City Ship Access:




• I would like to see a Player City starport. Yes, but limited to only 1-2 other cities per planet. Not every two horse burg should have a starport.


• I would like to see a Player City starship terminal. Yes, but limited to the select cities that can have the starports.


9. I think decay is:




• Too high.


• Just right. Yes


• Too low.

---

---

1. I would like to see increased factory support.Y


2. I would like to see Shipwright trainers in Player Cities.Y


3. I would like to be able to convert Shipwright XP into Force Crafting XP.Y


4. I would like to see increased returns from experimenting.Y


5. I believe resource quality does not have enough effect on item stats.Y


6. Mark V masses are too high.Y


7. Droid Interfaces/Flight Computers:




• I would like to see Flight Computers moved to Shipwright.N


• OR


• I would like to see Droid Interfaces moved to Droid Engineer.N


8. Player City Ship Access:




• I would like to see a Player City starport.


• I would like to see a Player City starship terminal.Y


9. I think decay is:




• Too high.


• Just right.Y


• Too low.

Message Edited by styx66 on 11-08-2004 06:11 AM

---

---

1. I would like to see increased factory support. Yes (limited)


2. I would like to see Shipwright trainers in Player Cities. Yes


3. I would like to be able to convert Shipwright XP into Force Crafting XP. NO WAY!


4. I would like to see increased returns from experimenting. No


5. I believe resource quality does not have enough effect on item stats. Yes


6. Mark V masses are too high. Dont know


7. Droid Interfaces/Flight Computers:




• I would like to see Droid Interfaces moved to Droid Engineer.


8. Player City Ship Access: Both




• I would like to see a Player City starport.


• I would like to see a Player City starship terminal.


9. I think decay is:




• Just right.

---