Ranger Archive
Thread: Combat Balance Testing Poll
Calculus_Entropy
Thu Aug 19, 2004 1:26 pm
#40
Owen-Lars wrote:
I do wonder what aRangers skillsinthere current form have to do with combat balancing.
A ranger's skill set does not inpact combat much no. However combat effects us to a great degree because we need to be in combat to hunt.
The main purpose will be to make sure ranger can still hunt, and still go out solo when needs be. Ensure camps become more usefull in terms of rest time etc and overall just make sure we cut a good deal for ourselves.
There is also the hope of getting new skills, as well....butOwen covered things nicely.
Editted: I am a moron ![]()
Message Edited by Calculus_Entropy on 08-19-2004 03:06 PM
Owen-Lars
Thu Aug 19, 2004 2:01 pm
#42
....but Nemo covered things nicely
Wha? Nemo posted in this thread?
Owen-Lars
Thu Aug 19, 2004 2:24 pm
#43
haha
Im just wondering why calc keeps mentioning nemo in his posts, he mentioned him in the organic survey device thread too. But nemo hasnt posted in well over a week 
Owen-Lars
Thu Aug 19, 2004 2:26 pm
#44
wha?
Calc are you messing with my mind here? It says my name now haha
I swear to god ive either just developed a severe case of dislexia or calc is fiddling with my brain. Can you fill my confused self in?
Message Edited by Owen-Lars on 08-19-2004 10:26 PM
Calculus_Entropy
Thu Aug 19, 2004 2:51 pm
#45
I edited the message where I wrote the wrong name. I guess I just like Nemo better than you!
Nah, I just have a bad time with names, and your name is too close to Nemo's (not THAT close, but close enough).
Calculus_Entropy
Thu Aug 19, 2004 2:52 pm
#46
BTW, one of MY rules for the testing is that y'all have to get on Teamspeak. I hate typing...just ask Paks.
Squidwalker
Thu Aug 19, 2004 2:59 pm
#47
My first thought is for you to pick them Calc. If you like maybe you pick three and let the community nominate 2? But I think you would make a better, easier, quicker, and less-hassle-harping-flaming-biassed decision then having us do it. We are rangers though, so if a community is going to be aloud to nominate anyone, we would probably be one of the better ones to do it.
Good luck, either way. Sounds like a lot of work, but at least those involved will have a play in a game they love.
Eklectrick
Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:00 pm
#48
How about an essay contest!
(dodges a barrage of crumpled up pieces of paper vollied at him)
Well I think the people who would get nominated would be the same as the people you'd have in mind. I trust you would select the best 5.
(dodges a barrage of crumpled up pieces of paper vollied at him)
Well I think the people who would get nominated would be the same as the people you'd have in mind. I trust you would select the best 5.
Calculus_Entropy
Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:03 pm
#49
Eklectrick wrote:
Well I think the people who would get nominated would be the same as the people you'd have in mind. I trust you would select the best 5.
That has been the case so far
. We must all be great minds.....
Owen-Lars
Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:20 pm
#50
I edited the message where I wrote the wrong name. I guess I just like Nemo better than you! Nah, I just have a bad time with names, and your name is too close to Nemo's (not THAT close, but close enough).
Ah i see 
Atleast im not going mad anyways hehe.
Calculus_Entropy
Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:23 pm
#51
Owen-Lars wrote:
I edited the message where I wrote the wrong name. I guess I just like Nemo better than you! Nah, I just have a bad time with names, and your name is too close to Nemo's (not THAT close, but close enough).
Ah i see
Atleast im not going mad anyways hehe.
ALWAYS check for the 'Edited by' comment when double checking your work! It saves some of your sanity.
Owen-Lars
Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:24 pm
#52
note taken 
Any news on the correspondent sumit yet calc? like any firm dates or anything? Im very excited as to what info you could be bringing back