Ranger Archive
Thread: Combat Balance Testing Poll
Page 5 of 5
Calculus_Entropy
Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:26 pm
#53
Owen-Lars wrote:
note taken
Any news on the correspondent sumit yet calc? like any firm dates or anything? Im very excited as to what info you could be bringing back
Well, I MIGHT be going at the end of next week....
Owen-Lars
Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:32 pm
#54
oh wow. I realy hope the hunter ideas get put across loud and clear. This combat revamp gets more and more important to rangers everytime i think of it. At first i though, ah the combat revamp, doesnt realy involve us, but now im very interested as to what it does to the support and hunting roles we have.
Oh on a totaly new topic good news from tc2 
We cried, they listened, the scout xp conversion rate for fs has been almost halved from 1>15 to 1>8.
Im very pleased with these changes, good to know the devs are listening in.
Seiryuu
Thu Aug 19, 2004 4:09 pm
#55
Owen is Nemo spelled backwards and the 'm' flipped upside down. Maybe that's your problem.
Springbok
Thu Aug 19, 2004 4:38 pm
#56
Washell wrote:
Springbok wrote:
1 (or 2) CH (since a big number of rangers incorporate MCH's or dabblers in CH), and if room 1 other, perhaps a CM with rangering tree filler.
Every correspondent will be there with 5 members of his/her community. I don't intend to get my rifle/ch issues to calc but to the relevent correspondents. Calc is here for the ranger part.
I know this. But rangers are going to get nowhere if we just get ranger and no combat skills to test combat balancing out =P. However evenly distributing the combat professions that rangers do use...is the point.
Aka will a fix for rangers be great for ranged but do squat for the other 2/3's-melee'ers and CH's?
Lol I'm aware what calc is correspondent of =P
Vorpaks
Thu Aug 19, 2004 5:14 pm
#57
@ NewoWHHHOOOOOOO!!!!! YEAH!!!! I am so excited about the summit!!!! You will have so much fun!!! And kick lots of ass!
*happydance*
*happydance*
*happydance*
EDIT: I can't believe they let me say ass. I thought that would be edited for sure.
Message Edited by Vorpaks on 08-19-2004 08:15 PM
Vorpaks
Thu Aug 19, 2004 7:10 pm
#59
/applies camo to n'Jessi's hawtpants
Hawtpants? I see no Hawtpants!
Team Ranger baby. All the way. Eat our terrain negotiation.
Hawtpants? I see no Hawtpants!
Team Ranger baby. All the way. Eat our terrain negotiation.
Message Edited by Vorpaks on 08-19-2004 10:16 PM
Calculus_Entropy
Thu Aug 19, 2004 9:27 pm
#60
Vorpaks wrote:
/applies camo to n'Jessi's hawtpants
Hawtpants? I see no Hawtpants!
Team Ranger baby. All the way. Eat our terrain negotiation.
Message Edited by Vorpaks on 08-19-2004 10:16 PM
You go girl!
Phenix1050
Thu Aug 19, 2004 9:58 pm
#61
Episode III: Attack of the Camo'd Hawtpants
This has also got me wondering....since we're asking for stealth in our proposal....could there existthe potential for stealth hawtpants?!?!
Page 5 of 5