Ranger Archive
Thread: Revised harvesting changes..
What I do is I made a batch file to move the live files to TC folder and vice versa when I want to switch. Not all files but all files that are at least 25,000 KB in size. This way I am just using an extra 200 megabytes of hard drive space by having TC installed. I save 2.58 GB of hard drive space.
Tiggs, it's not a zero-sum game here, there is more to the dynamics then first meets the eye.
...and this does not give you other people liscense to troll the ranger forums
Yeah, it was brought up at the last Fan Fest and they basically said something along the lines of, "people would take musician or dancer just to buff themselves and that's not what we envisioned for the profession" or something to that effect. It's hard to imagine a combat profession grinding to Master Musician (which takes a LONG time) and spending all those skill points for a mind buff. And besides, people can become doctors just to buff themselves. I don't see how it is any different.
Calculus_Entropy wrote:
And by the same regard why can't a Master Entertainer buff themselves?
If a Doctor can buff himself and his groups for equal amounts, why can't a Master Rangerget the same benefit of grouping that an non-Master Ranger gets?
I agree andI support Ents buffing themselves...
Tiggs wrote:
Meplorium wrote:
The question is, and it wasn't at least clear to me, does the ranger, if near others in his group, get the bonus from himself for himself? What if there is another ranger in the group of the same skill. Do the rangers then get the bonus from each other?
Tiggs wrote:
Owen-Lars wrote:
AragornSoS Wrote:
"If I'm already a Master Ranger, and I'm grouped, does that mean I always pull 40% bonus since I'm within 64m of the Master Ranger in the group (me)?"
Yep, as you are the master ranger, you are always within 64m of one so you get the bonus even if its only you out on your own (effectivelly allowing solo hunting group rangers, although who would want to after these changes?).
My apologies here but this is incorrect.
What happens is the bonus does a check and makes sure that someone around you is within 64m and if that someone is a ranger/master ranger it will select the highest bonus to apply as long as they are grouped with you. Sorry if the version notes were not clear.
It's a non-stackable bonus (example 3 master rangers in the group you get a one time bonus applied).
I hope this clears up the confusion.
This is a bonus for grouping not for being a master ranger/ranger.
To explain things better I hunted down Runesabre and here is what he had to say
The bonus is based on everyone around you. You being a Master Ranger does not benefit yourself in regards to this harvesting bonus. If you are a MR and grouped with a Rifleman, you will get a 20% bonus for having someone grouped with you within 64m. If you want the 40% bonus, you will need to have another MR grouped with you and within 64m.
Message Edited by Tiggs on 02-18-2005 01:28 PM
What in the hec is this????
We invest a couple of hundred skill points to be a Master Ranger, which already has next to ZERO benefit and we don't get a 40% bonus for ALREADY being a Master Ranger?
So Tiggs is it safe to assume that you folks are going to go through and remove the rest of the bonuses for all of the other professions' Master box? We obviously don't want players to be under the mistaken impression that they should benefit from being a Master of their own profession, regardless of skill points invested.
This really needs to be fixed. How much more are Ranger's supposed to endure from the Dev team?
Tiggs wrote:
Atherin wrote:
You are fogetting that the MR already gets a bonus to his harvest just for being a MR. He gets 20% on top of that for being in a group. And the group members get 40% on top of whaterver profession bonus they also have.
We will have to test the numbers but it looks at first blush to work out fairly equitably.
Exactly!! Like I said earlier this is a bonus for grouping not for being a master ranger/ranger.
Tiggs,
What I am about to say I have been saying sinceI heard about this change, and since the news your brought us, it has only confirmed my view.
Simply, on principal, the only fair way to deal with harvesting and groups is to remove the group penalty, and do not add any bonuses.
As things are now (in live) people are penalised for being grouped. If the TC changes go live, then solo players will be penalised instead. It is simply exchanging one problem for another, and thus not solving anything. It is really that simple.
To summerise, drop the group harvesting penalty, and drop the gruop harvesting bonuses. Please, we rangers are very patient folk, but I can honestly say that this is the firs time I've seen my correspondant saying he doesn't like something, and it's the first I've had 95 email notifications of a ranger message board in one evening. So, I think that eternal patience is now wearing thin this time. This is a very important issue that has so far not been handled correctly.
Calculus_Entropy wrote:
FYI - I requested the other Harvesting thread be locked so that we can have all the discussion in one place.
I fugured, you had something to do with it ![]()
Anyways, I have to agree with DaveG..... Remove grouphunting penalties, and remove the new group hunting bonuses (Makes sense and it's simple).
This by itself is enough topromote group hunting.....