Pistoleer Archive
Thread: Status of Pistoleer Specials
Zidas wrote:
Why disarming Shot cannot damage enemy weapons conditions? ... why it's called DISARMING SHOT?
I think this is a good point.
1) The name 'Disarming Shot" implies that it disarms the target and so is good against armed npcs and in PvP. I think it even says it 'disarms' in the discription.
2) If you were "disarming" a target you'd definately cause damage to their weapons condition.
IMO, even if this attack was weaker than the defualt attack, it would still be a vicious attack if it did what its name implies. You would disarm the target forcing them towaste timere-equipping their weapon and getting back into firing position. Lastly, you'd damage their weapon. Even with 0dmg, many people would think twice about taking you on for fear of a Disarming shot spam.
Kill me will you?! Fine! Kiss your Krayt 10mil gun g-bye!
a powerful deterent.
Message Edited by Palinore- on 06-16-2004 06:36 AM
Message Edited by Palinore- on 06-16-2004 06:44 AM
Message Edited by Palinore- on 06-16-2004 06:45 AM
Randonb wrote:
Yes, Disarming Shot damaging our target's weapon has been ruled out. It would be a griefing tool. Though it might be a good way to keep the jedi population down.. /snicker.. don't go quote that, that wasn't a nice thing for me to say.
Unequipping our target's weapon is also ruled out, as it would be more frustrating (for our enemy) than fun. And what if you were facing a TKA? We'd get the same effect if it caused a delay.Delays have gotten the ol' Warcry nerf though, so there's no way we're getting that. Smugglers tried to escape it and failed, and I'm sure we'd have no better luck.
That leaves us with some other way ofdemonstrating some kind of "disarm" effect.