Musician Archive
Thread: Dark times and A New Hope (The Jukebox)
NewJedi wrote:
I'm basically with Warryyr on this one. Yeah, maybe these jukeboxes won't hurt us musicians much. But confound it, why pour dev time -- and music -- into canned boxes instead of live musicians? For months and months and months, we've been asking for new songs. Instead, they gave music to a machine.![]()
However, what a bloody lukewarm answer Scipionus got. "We hear you but we're going to put a terminal in anyway...we may change it some time". It's the internet equivilent of urinating on me and telling me it's raining. I'm an adult and I know what such a non-commital politically concieved statement means...nothing. Just as Javier has pointed out, they've said this exact same thing before. They have not followed up on such claims.
My RL has been extraordinarily busy of late so I have had little time to play. However, if the Devs can't even take the time to think about what effect such an implimentation as the jukebox could do to us, then my faith that they have anything in mind that might help is limited. I think it may also be a case of the right hand not knowing what the left is doing on the Dev team.
Tyrant's comment about not being able to find a band ring to the very heart of catering to a powergame style of play. It's the same reasoning bot-lovers have been giving us for ages now..."I can't find an entertainer twenty-four hours a day, so a bot is necessary". Now you don't even have to ask a Musician for music in any capacity.
Warryr, you're right, this is not the end of the world. It certainly is a step toward DEFCON 1, though. If the devs genuinely cared about us they would have at least pulled the jukebox back til they could make us a part of it's process at the very least. Even less than that, they could have given Scipionus a more honest answer to post instead of a lukewarm paragraph of marketing doublespeak. However, the put it in as is, just like the broken dances, etc.
*sigh* I may need a fouum reading break...I really should be working right now anyway, and this just hacked me off instead of relaxed me.
psikobunny wrote:
Warryyr I applaud your words in this thread, and the attitude you've taken.
We've disagreed somewhat vehemently before, but the bulk of my issues stemmed from when you did post before reflection, and when you did get snide about Devs. I am very glad to see you take a definite pause, think, then post, for this. I want you to know I am proud of you. It may not count for much, but I am. You're words here are a truer reflection of how I feel than any I can type at the moment. Because the anger and despair is still too strong.
I'm off topic but I wanted you to know how proud I was of these posts, let his words speak for how I feel, until I can find some of my own.
/bow
Thanks for the kind words.
Nobody sees eye-to-eye all the time. I've actually enjoyed our arguments quite a bit, heh. I know I get all worked up over things, and very often just need to chill the **edit** out.
Today's a not-so-good day. Hopefully tomorrow will be better...
Granted, I'm wondering what happened to bring you to this zen-like state, instead of tearing people's arms out, but I ain't complaining
Anyways, I got my message with a little more info approved by the devs and have posted it in the Feedback thread. We may not win all our battles, but you can sure as hell believe that I'm going to be fighting as hard as I can for us back there. And if the tide turns, I'll be so happy to share the good times with all of you.
/sap off
Warryyr wrote:
Ok, I think this is the sentence, for real this time:
"This Publish has shaken a lot of Musicians to their core, more than I think the Devs have admitted to themselves."
MusicalDina wrote:
IMO the BEST thing we could ever get from a dev at this time is a dev vision on what they currently see our profession doing/being.
IMO we have been needing this since day one. Howthey can possibly work without design docs is beyond inconceivable to me. However, this seems to be what we've been told or has been implied in the past. How anyone could expect us to contribute cooperatively in a participatory design environment without specifications regarding the dev's expectations..well, it's just impossible! They want our feedback, ideas and vision of how we would like to play our professions? They Must give us guidelines..a framework within which we can define Our vision. Without such a framework..without knowledge of what they will find acceptable..we are only wasting time submitting one idea after another.We have been groping around in the dark for far too long.
fixed it for ya
Warryyr wrote:
My money's on the ability for Musicians to /setgoddessmode active.
Just a hunch.