Merchant Archive

Thread: Backpacks on Vendors

LadyGrace
Sat Aug 21, 2004 6:06 am
#14






DocSavag wrote:
As many of you know containers on vendors on TC currently count as 1 item towards the sales item limit. This was obviously not intended and I have confirmed with JustG that it won't remain that way. It might not get changed before publish 10 gets released however VERY soon the total items in the container will count against your item limit cap.

This really was the only way to do it, it makes no sense to set item limits and then give people a way to store 50x that number in containers. Please don't use packs to store things on your vendor in the mean time. You will only get frustrated when theyh fix it and having informed you in advance the sympathy level will be rather low.





Do you think at the same time they could make it so that customers can look inside the pack to confirm what's in it? At least that way it could still be useful to use packs, even if they do count toward item limit.


I mean, if we're going to "pay" for the item space, let it be fully usable.



Adrianna
v Grace Industries v
-3171 5939 Tranquility Naboo
Imperial Faction Sales
Rebel Faction Sales
Srednii
Sat Aug 21, 2004 6:50 am
#15

*sigh*


So many ways they could be improving merchant, so many great idea's that have been talked over a million times during the past year, so many other things they could be doing. Instead they keep nerfing crap. Jeebus Rice, but wouldn't it be nice if they spent the same amount of energy on improving merchant as they have been lately on nerfing it?


Just think, the ability to control vendor appearance, ability to pick vendors up and move them. Sales tracking abilities, email management functions, the option to add a tax for factioned players, and any of the other billion great idea's discussed over the past year.


They could be adding any of those great functions, but instead they just keep nerfing stuff.





------------------------------------------------------------

Sre'dni Vashtar - Bria
sv Armoury -4976, 2712 Corellia
Vrond
Sat Aug 21, 2004 6:56 am
#16

If the items in the packs are all counted will the customer be able to see the items? If they could at least see whats inside this would not be so bad.



Vrond Novawolf
Get onboard the Falcon kid this game is gonna blow
Fred75
Sat Aug 21, 2004 7:59 am
#17






Vrond wrote:

If the items in the packs are all counted will the customer be able to see the items? If they could at least see whats inside this would not be so bad.







THAT would make too much sense. I saw a vendor that had some items that I wanted to buy... I think. I think they were crates of items put into a backpack for xxx,xxx credits. BUT, I have NO way of knowing for sure that those 20 itemsin that bag are crates of what I want, 20 chance dices etc etc. But atm this is the way most people package special orders also. So until they make it so you can flag an item for a certain person and it wont show up on a regular search, there would be no real way of people not seeing those 500k or ore in a pack back for super cheap prices and buying it out from underneath someone. (I know that can still happen so people will put up bags of junk for high prices basically HOPING someone thinks they are getting a really good deal on something but just paid 5,000,000 credits for 20 dice .


Exterminans77
Sat Aug 21, 2004 8:24 am
#18

Why can't they make it so that the total items in the backpack count but you can still place full backpacks on the vendors? Its nice to beable to package items together for sale (i.e. full sets of composite or buffs). If not in the backpack perhaps they could make package units for us to package items for sale, perhaps architects/tailors or master artisans could make the package item. We need ways to package items and its not something that can wait till the Merchant Revamp (god knows when that will be).


I don't see where this would be a problem...
11Rastus11
Sat Aug 21, 2004 8:45 am
#19






DocSavag wrote:
As many of you know containers on vendors on TC currently count as 1 item towards the sales item limit. This was obviously not intended and I have confirmed with JustG that it won't remain that way. It might not get changed before publish 10 gets released however VERY soon the total items in the container will count against your item limit cap.

This really was the only way to do it, it makes no sense to set item limits and then give people a way to store 50x that number in containers. Please don't use packs to store things on your vendor in the mean time. You will only get frustrated when theyh fix it and having informed you in advance the sympathy level will be rather low.





/sigh I have 50 suits of armor in packs....oh man! not to mention all the sliced singles and varoius other resourses and junk



Gemea Travek 12pt Doctor RETIRED JudgeBain 12pt Armorsmith RETIRED
Tel Avivv, Dantooine Tent #1 -2610 -4110
When They Consolidate Servers....I hope they dont kill Shadowfire!
Angoris
Sat Aug 21, 2004 9:56 am
#20

This is pathetic. If this decision was made by any of the Merchant Correspondants or any of the Community Leaders and communicated to SOE, then the lot of youneed a reality check. If this was SOE's decision, you are more ignorant and blind to your customer's needs than I thought. Pathetic, truly pathetic. One bag should be counted as one item on the vendor no matter how many damn items are in it.


You are selling the entire suit of armor as ONE SALE. It should be ONE ITEM. You will be forcing the hands of Armorsmiths to sell things by the crate. Guess what happens then? The poor get poorer and the rich get richer. You are neglecting a good amount of your playerbase and will end up losing customers. "Blah blah blah you guys always find a way around it so don't whine and complain that you are not getting your way" There, I said it for you now shut up and fix it back the way it was.


Lowering the number of items allowed on a vendor is one thing, killing part of the sales process is another. We already have Armorsmiths and Weaponsmiths quitting their professions left and right because of this crap. Now you are going to alienate the rest of us. How about lowering the point cost of Merchant? How about lowering the point costs all around so we can have more professions to make up for these stupid ideas that creep into the development team's heads? How about GETTING A CLUE?!




GRI'GORI : Warmaster / Teräs Käsi Monk
Epicenter, Tatooine: Land of Legend, Land of Lore, Land of Life
Future Master Politician / Future Master Smuggler
Adventure, excitement... A Jedi craves not these things, but I sure as hell do!


Fred75
Sat Aug 21, 2004 9:58 am
#21






Exterminans77 wrote:

Why can't they make it so that the total items in the backpack count but you can still place full backpacks on the vendors? Its nice to beable to package items together for sale (i.e. full sets of composite or buffs). If not in the backpack perhaps they could make package units for us to package items for sale, perhaps architects/tailors or master artisans could make the package item. We need ways to package items and its not something that can wait till the Merchant Revamp (god knows when that will be).


I don't see where this would be a problem...






I dont think I read where you couldnt still put item in bags and sell them, but if you have 50 items in a backpack it'll count as 51 items towards your limit.
TheCapn2000
Sat Aug 21, 2004 10:05 am
#22


Completely pathetic. For volume sellers this is a killer. The fun level of this game keeps dropping with each freakin patch. I'd rather play Pong at this point.

Message Edited by TheCapn2000 on 08-21-2004 10:09 AM



«Sirros» «Dirrk» «Odin'»
THANKS KAURI...IT WAS FUN

LadyGrey
Sat Aug 21, 2004 10:17 am
#23






TheCapn2000 wrote:


Completely pathetic. For volume sellers this is a killer. The fun level of this game keeps dropping with each freakin patch. I'd rather play Pong at this point.






I've actually been playing MineSweeper, when I'm too depressed to log on. Wish WoW would have Open Beta.





/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
LadyGrey

Don't let the negative AFKophobes get you down. Play the game however you want.

Is the beta testing almost over for this game?
Yogol
Sat Aug 21, 2004 10:19 am
#24






Sevardos wrote:

I want to the ability to continue the practice of bundling. If they are insistent on removing it, then have them introduce something new that will help. Perhaps the abiltiy to crate without requiring it to be the same product.




One of us two needs a lesson in English :-)


Docdidn't say you can't bundle. He even said that you could by stating "items inside a backpack count towards your max number". So you CAN put stuff in a backpack name it "budle armor" and sell it. You just can't cheat the max limit anymore, that's all.





000000000000
000000000000Yogol Elder Jedi.
000000000000
000000000000Yoggie Trader on Corellia -320 -5500.
000000000000
000000000000Yogu Wannebe Medic.
000000000000

Cookie Cruncher.
Dimear
Sat Aug 21, 2004 11:46 am
#25






Sevardos wrote:

Dear god, this is driving me to drink.


One of the key assumptions for me when determining the viability of the new item limitation was the ability to continue the practice of "bundling" products; i.e., buffpacks, etc. Not storage ... bundling.


Why do I bundle? Two reasons;


1. From a customer perspective, it's an easy purchase. Instead of having to hunt around to make sure they buy all the right stats and that they are the same power (# of charges, power, etc) - all they need to do is buy ONE item that has done everything for them. One 'bundled' package.


2. From my perspective; it maximizes my inventory. Everytime I sell them seperately (out of the set), I always end up with waste. Example: Someone would go in and buy 5 Action buffs and nothing else, leaving me high and dry for 5 sets of buffpacks. It's one of the key reasons I started doing it in the first place.


I don't give a damn about increased storage. I want to the ability to continue the practice of bundling. If they are insistent on removing it, then have them introduce something new that will help. Perhaps the abiltiy to crate without requiring it to be the same product.


They need to understand that there are LEGITIMATE uses. Why do players who try their best to play within the rules both directly and within the spirit of the game, keep getting bloody smacked down.


::::sigh::::






My Legitimate Use: I sell backpacks of resources used for lightsabers. There are 10 different type of lightsabers (each needs different amounts of resources), so 10 types of items on my vendor. Each saber uses up to 8 different resources, so 1 item for sale will now count as 9. Add in a few lightsaber tools and crafting foods, and I need master merchant just to run this business - and this is assuming I shut down my other current businesses (other resources, loot items, misc weapons, etc).


I personally agree with the idea that items in a backpack should be counted, but now the 4000 items at master merchant is too low. I have been master merchant for several months, and this change feels like a significant nerf to those players like me who don't exploit, and don't use vendors for storage. I use houses for storage.


- Dimear










Thus sayeth Dimear

Tarnak_Archvold
Sat Aug 21, 2004 12:23 pm
#26


- folks do that because they NEED the storage.



Know one NEED's that much storage space, People may wand it and be capable of using it up, but they do not need it. And do not start on the hole "I need it for resources... bla bla... not sure when they spawn... bla bla..." thing. You can choose to make a more limited selection of goods, to sell of old stack when something better gets in.




"Once upon a time Rangers roamed the galaxies... Before the dark times, before the NGE. "
Once a Ranger, Always a Ranger.
Page 2 of 13