Jump To Lightspeed Archive

Thread: YT-1300 Still not soloable?

AlexDarquan
Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:03 pm
#14






truewildman wrote:





ZeeEmperials wrote:





Bullbyte wrote:





AlexDarquan wrote:





Everitt_Cage wrote:

why would it be changed? did you watch the movies?






Notice at the end of a new hope when Han shoots the TIE off luke and spends Vader spinning?





Good one. You know your movies. Something Everitt_Cage does not.





Wookie?







Zactly. There is not one movie reference that shows the YT-1300 in battle with only one person in it.





Also dont forget the several small philapeno children chewie hired to fit into the small compartmentsand fire the small gun mounts at the stromtroopers thus blasting their way out of mos eisley. They were also handy in echo base.




Menta
-III-
Master Bounty Hunter

MadcowwithSARS
Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:04 pm
#15






truewildman wrote:





ZeeEmperials wrote:





Bullbyte wrote:





AlexDarquan wrote:





Everitt_Cage wrote:

why would it be changed? did you watch the movies?






Notice at the end of a new hope when Han shoots the TIE off luke and spends Vader spinning?





Good one. You know your movies. Something Everitt_Cage does not.





Wookie?







Zactly. There is not one movie reference that shows the YT-1300 in battle with only one person in it.


I sincerely hope they leave it as is. You wanna battle solo? Keep a fighter in your datapad, or redeed one.







That is the way it should stay, It takes too much of the pilots skills to manage the YT-1300s systems in flight. Also i think what looks like Chewie shooting at that TIE that flys over is actually one of the TIE's blaster popping off the front as it flies over. It looked to me like Chewie was flipping a curcuit breaker. But i could be wrong and would definatly accept it if i was. But i dont think for sanity sake keep the YT-1300 a freighter and not an attack craft. Turrets are for defense not offense.



"No botha de' Jabba"


- Cant Wait till Grumpy People Quit I Like NGE

Carp-L Tunnel (Former MWS/MM/MA now Master gimp)
truewildman
Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:05 pm
#16






Cobra2468 wrote:

heres a thought... who cares if han fired them from the cockpit or not, its a movie this is a game. the turrets should face forward and be fireable from the cockpit when nobody else is in the ship. it will stil have a disadvantage because they wont be as effective






Do you realize how bad it would be to have forward-firing only weapons on a flying brick? You go up and try once, you'll never want to do it solo again.





Boslo
-Elder Smuggler/Elder Commando-
Ra'van Crowe
-Elder Smuggler/Elder BH-
I'on
-Pirate-
"You gotta be a little insane to stay sane."
Uther27
Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:05 pm
#17

Yeah, this has been done to death already.


Multi-player ships need mutiple players to be fully manned, this is the way they have balanced them. With 500000 mass you have enough room for the top-level everything and probably still have enough room for more. You already have the ability to fire of the THREE missle launchers, why would you even think that you need the cannons as well? Unless you just want to have uber ships flying around with everyone flying solo in a MP ship once they get master, think again.


Let it be, and quit griping about things that are not really an issue.




Oune Freedark
Imperial Colonel
Imperial Ace - Black Epsilon
Eclipse
lund0529
Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:06 pm
#18

I don't see why in a SW universe the pilot couldn't lock the guns in place or even direct them from the cockpit.


Sure, he couldn't see anything, but he should be able to direct the guns to the forward or rear (any direction?) and fire based on the ship movement.
MadcowwithSARS
Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:08 pm
#19






Cobra2468 wrote:

heres a thought... who cares if han fired them from the cockpit or not, its a movie this is a game. the turrets should face forward and be fireable from the cockpit when nobody else is in the ship. it will stil have a disadvantage because they wont be as effective






Here's a thought, if your going to throw out the who cares if its in the movie this is a game. Then throw out the damn name star wars then, throw out anchorhead, throw out the sarlaac pit throw out everything else representing star wars. Call it "A space game kinda like Star Wars" They already Fubarrd the ground game please leave space alone.

Message Edited by MadcowwithSARS on 11-02-2004 11:09 AM



"No botha de' Jabba"


- Cant Wait till Grumpy People Quit I Like NGE

Carp-L Tunnel (Former MWS/MM/MA now Master gimp)
monochromered
Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:12 pm
#20






Uther27 wrote:

Yeah, this has been done to death already.


Multi-player ships need mutiple players to be fully manned, this is the way they have balanced them. With 500000 mass you have enough room for the top-level everything and probably still have enough room for more. You already have the ability to fire of the THREE missle launchers, why would you even think that you need the cannons as well? Unless you just want to have uber ships flying around with everyone flying solo in a MP ship once they get master, think again.


Let it be, and quit griping about things that are not really an issue.








With thewayamaster pilot profession is obtained, ie going into a pvpzone, I fully believe everyone will not make it tomaster. Only the best and most organized will.Therefore everyonewont use MPS's. AlsoMPS's will not fit everyonesplaying style. Some peoplepreferfaster more manverable ships, something MPSs are not.


Message Edited by monochromered on 11-02-2004 11:16 AM

Everitt_Cage
Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:47 pm
#21


Good one. You know your movies. Something Everitt_Cage does not.


Message Edited by Everitt_Cage on 11-02-2004 02:13 PM

monochromered
Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:53 pm
#22






Everitt_Cage wrote:

why would it be changed? did you watch the movies?






Actually Han does fire himself in ANH on first sight of the Tie Fighter, when the Falcon is approaching the Death Star. He touchs two levers above him, and then you can bothsee and hear blaster fire.
KaylBreinhar
Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm
#23



Tumbler2002 wrote:
Wouldn't it be fun to by those super AI turrets and put them in?



That's pretty much how it was in X-Wing Alliance. All you really had to do was fly around erratically while your AI picked off the TIEs.



Death doesn't fly a JSF anymore...he flies a Gallente Thorax in EVE Online
Stile2112
Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:10 pm
#24

Stop comparing the YT-1300 to the Falcon. It's not the same. The YT-1300 is a transport ship. Han highlymodified his ship (won from Lando) to deal with situations he got into when running goods. (IE. Weapons, shields, engines)


btw, there are several small turrets mounted around the ship that can be fired from the cockpit. In ESB, when the imperials come into the hanger bay on hoth. Chewy open fires on the imps trying to setup there tripod weapon.







Adept Lightingsky
Shrouded Sun Empire -IMP-
Tuocs_Repoort
Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:17 pm
#25

Speaking of Lando go watch ROTJ and see how he takes out the Death Star Reactor. No turret there.
In fact watch the whole space battle part and see how many times they shoot forward without turrets.
My guess Between ANH and ROTJ Han got some pretty sweet weapon upgrades from the Rebels.

Message Edited by Tuocs_Repoort on 11-02-2004 03:18 PM

truewildman
Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:19 pm
#26






Tuocs_Repoort wrote:
Speaking of Lando go watch ROTJ and see how he takes out the Death Star Reactor. No turret there.
In fact watch the whole space battle part and see how many times they shoot forward without turrets.
My guess Between ANH and ROTJ Han got some pretty sweet weapon upgrades from the Rebels.

Message Edited by Tuocs_Repoort on 11-02-2004 03:18 PM






That's a good point. So, according to the time-line, no forward-firing guns yet.


Game mechanics, too, though. Can you imagine PvPing in a flying brick with forward-firing only weapons?? /shudder






Boslo
-Elder Smuggler/Elder Commando-
Ra'van Crowe
-Elder Smuggler/Elder BH-
I'on
-Pirate-
"You gotta be a little insane to stay sane."
Page 2 of 6