Dancer Archive
Thread: In Development: Recursive Macros are going away.
How? You don't need a recursive macro to buff somebody. You just need to write a more efficient macro. Make one with 120 flourishes and pauses in the proper places. Tiaga has a post that should help you adapt.
Iarian wrote:
I'm very mixed about this....
Also - I've seen some others say this - but I'm going to repeat anyways... I see this hurting the 3 minute buff - I have people who are willing to pay more for the 3 minute buff.
Neutronos wrote:
...
Anyone of you guys who are in favour of this try and master Musician FROM SCRATCH without a looping macro. Is that your idea of FUN?! HEll why not just do dancer again while doing musician then youll get all that action you guys are so fond off. Its a hoot!...
Neutronos wrote:
I doubt any of you dancers / musicians who already mastered this did it without any use of macros. Cmon tell me im wrong.
Offcourse you didnt use macros. It just so easy not to.
You're wrong.
I've never used a macro, even for buffing. And my LIVE Entertainment guild will, and has, kicked it's members for AFK leveling. We know it's a cheat and an exploit.
Just because you or others have no patience doesn't mean that everyone simply goes for the easiest route. Some of us know that the path taken is far more valuable than the end of the journey. And we're more skilled for it in the end.
kirah_ashlin wrote:
I've scanned over some of the pages beyond my own post in TH's thread andone thing that I find disheartening is the number of players saying that the entertainment profession should be done away with altogether and made into NPCs . . . . . sigh. That to me is the sign ofultimate selfishness in this playerbase - the "screw everyone else because I"M the most important player in this game" mentality. My only comfort is that most of these players probably have their monthy accounts funded by mommy and daddy . . .
FadedLeatherJacket wrote:
I get much more enjoyment out of the game and the grind has been less tedious being able to get a buff when I need it. I don't care if the bots are afk *or* that they are making fortunes. The only thing I care about is the quality of my gaming experience... and I enjoy it much more buffed. I do NOT enjoy searching high and low for a doc or entertainer to buff me.
Knight776 wrote:
but people would rather pay their $15/month or more to be entertained by someone that isn't even there.
KDubDanzig wrote:
This sucks I think. I go to the buffbot near Cnet all the time for mind buffs. I can never find an entertainer to give mind buffs that is not afk.
That is exactly what this change is trying to fix. What's your point?
Discourage AFK playing means the entertainers around will more than likely be at the keyboard. Meaning, you'll actually FIND someone to buff you. Returning our services to a valuable commodity in the playerbase may very well encourage more folks to play entertainers - I mean, really play them, not bot them.
PhoenixStar wrote:
Anyone who says that got to master dancer/musician without the use of a macro is a pitiful liar.
Xyrdre wrote:
PhoenixStar wrote:
Anyone who says that got to master dancer/musician without the use of a macro is a pitiful liar.
You are sadly misinformed. Sorry you can't imagine enjoying playing an entertainer all the way. It's called patience, and using that leveling time to greatest advantage. And not trying to do it all at once... yes, it takes somesanitybreaks outside of the cantina. I've never heard of a dancer who never had a day off; it fits the mold just fine.
Oh well, the lazy always assume everyone else is like them.
Message Edited by Shidi-Rommu on 08-02-2004 04:43 PM