Dancer Archive

Thread: So is unattended buffers (aka, the downfall of entertainers) going away with the combat upgrade?

DanceRulez
Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:08 am
#14

Just as a reminder for some of the ideas coming up in here, the idea of removing the /join command was proposed to the devs a while back, and as I recall, was flatly rejected by them. Also TH himself once proposed the idea of a buffing interface to discourage buffbotting. It was met with mixed feedback from the entertainers. Some liked it, though often with some reluctance, as a way to disable bots, but many didn't like thought of hassling with an additional clunky interface to do buffing. This proposal from TH was fairly quickly scrapped, though, as it was replaced with the announcement that AFK macros would be removed.



Shi'ann Dinova
Hot Pink Twi'lek of Mystery

TCWolffe
Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:40 am
#15

It isn't....which leads to the conclusion that this is a policy coming from higher up. I guess the entertainers that PLAY entertainers are less important than people with entertainer alts who run NPC-like zombies, because they provide SOE with more income. They get what they want, they make all the money, they get all the SEA's, they get all the business, they turn our profession into one that is percieved as just a quick time sink to drop their BF, get some buffs and be on their way.

I would suggest with the upcoming CU, if the short term/long term 20%/10% formula applies to us as well, that you consider picking up so basic combat skills, enough to protect yourself and get into some armor, go out with a group and provide your services directly....who needs a 10% long term buff (from a buff-bot) if there is a 20% one available and ready to be reapplied travelling along with you? If we don't get out 'in the field' then its just more reason for people to get alts and have them log in every so often, zip over to the group, rebuff, log off. So the choice is, we go where the people are and leave the cantinas to the bots, or stay in the cantinas by ourselves and never see another soul.

Obviously i'm showing both extremes, but I hope you see that the direction things are heading will require us to get up and do something, and not expect an answer to just be delivered to us on a platter.



"Voice of the Voiceless"
Ai'jou and Kiva in training
Maisland
Fri Mar 25, 2005 10:15 am
#16




shadowdefender wrote:
Curious as to why the Devs would flat out reject removal of the /join command if your there playing your character how hard it is to accept the group invite?



It isn't... unless you go LD just before you accept/reject... then the pop-up will not be there when you get back in game, but you will still have the invitation to group and the only way to accept is /join. This has happened to me.



I survived the CU


I can not survive the NGE


Aviada
Sun Mar 27, 2005 12:33 pm
#17

So, someone explain something to me.


if they remove 'afk macroing' does that mean we have to sit there and manually hit the flourish button over and over? I mastered dancer while at the keyboard the entire time the first few times I did it and I had a recuring macro going or I would've had carpel tunnel syndrome. Is this what the entertainer community is wanting?
Sunjammer
Sun Mar 27, 2005 2:52 pm
#18




Aviada wrote:
if they remove 'afk macroing' does that mean we have to sit there and manually hit the flourish button over and over?




Nope. It is possible to make non-looping macros: Clicky.

I have three or four non-recursive macros, usually based around a "refrain" of three or four flourishes, with different moves in between each refrain. They last about 15 minutes and end in a /stopdance and /deepbow.


Umi

Message Edited by Sunjammer on 03-27-2005 04:57 PM

Ihareo
Sun Mar 27, 2005 3:03 pm
#19






Esharra wrote:





Aviada wrote:

So, someone explain something to me.


if they remove 'afk macroing' does that mean we have to sit there and manually hit the flourish button over and over?


I think most dancers who are in favor ofremoving the ability for avatars to be left animating while unattended are not in favor of effecting their ability to run a recursive macro.Many seem to be in favor of reducing afk play while still retaining theability for themselves to go afk for "short" periods even. To others, this seems contradictory. If recursion was removed, you would still have the ability to write macroslong enough to allow you to avoid hitting a key for a few minutes (at least). There are a number of ways that unattended play could be addressed, we'll just have to see where the devs take it.


I mastered dancer while at the keyboard the entire time the first few times I did it and I had a recuring macro going or I would've had carpel tunnel syndrome. Is this what the entertainer community is wanting?


Some,like myself, don't use macros muchat all and would be rather annoyed if our avatars were doing the same thing over & over again, with no variation. Everyone has their own preferences.








Esharra, you know I respect you deeply. However, you know that you can't expect everyone to play your way just because you play that way.


Some of us need recursive macros. period.


When I want variation, I switch to a different macro.





Ihareo Imtame--Adept of the Force
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000


Ravanne_Esi
Sun Mar 27, 2005 3:20 pm
#20

I doubt that AFK Buffbotting will ever be taken out of the game other than by EULA enforcement. If they try to remove or highly modify the macro system at this time I would suspect that it would cause more problems than it would be worth, probably breaking many current systems.And almost anyother system they put in to enforce it would cause more problems for legitimate users of the game than it would for buffbotters.




Ravanne Esi
Master Dancer, Master Entertainer, Master Musician
Ragin' Rancor Enterprises
New Hope, Naboo
-

Esharra
Sun Mar 27, 2005 3:36 pm
#21






Ihareo wrote:





Esharra wrote:





Aviada wrote:

So, someone explain something to me.


if they remove 'afk macroing' does that mean we have to sit there and manually hit the flourish button over and over?


I think most dancers who are in favor ofremoving the ability for avatars to be left animating while unattended are not in favor of effecting their ability to run a recursive macro.Many seem to be in favor of reducing afk play while still retaining theability for themselves to go afk for "short" periods even. To others, this seems contradictory. If recursion was removed, you would still have the ability to write macroslong enough to allow you to avoid hitting a key for a few minutes (at least). There are a number of ways that unattended play could be addressed, we'll just have to see where the devs take it.


I mastered dancer while at the keyboard the entire time the first few times I did it and I had a recuring macro going or I would've had carpel tunnel syndrome. Is this what the entertainer community is wanting?


Some,like myself, don't use macros muchat all and would be rather annoyed if our avatars were doing the same thing over & over again, with no variation. Everyone has their own preferences.








Esharra, you know I respect you deeply. However, you know that you can't expect everyone to play your way just because you play that way.


Some of us need recursive macros. period.


When I want variation, I switch to a different macro.






I have no problem with recursive macros. Nothing in my post states that I have a problem with recursive macros. Nor do I have a problem with non-recursive macros. I don't use macros..recursive or otherwise..that does not mean that I'm against their use. I just have more fun..am less bored..without them. So..for the record..I don't have a problem with macro use. I do have a problem with unattended play.


Frankly, I don't think removing recursion is the solution to the problem of unattended play. I don't see a policy change as a manageable solutionthough.


(About the only thing I Do have a problem with thatI hinted at in my previous post,is players saying they want to get rid of unattended play but still want to retain the ability to play unattended themselves. I'm just a little intolerent of the hypocrisy in that train of thought.)

Message Edited by Esharra on 03-27-2005 04:38 PM



Esharra ěsh-äŕ-rä, noun
1. Entertainer
2. Bounty Hunter
3. Smuggler

"One man's oddity is another man's routine." -Bertos Goodner (a dancer)


Panthu
Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:24 pm
#22

The last time I personally saw a dev comment on this happening was after the Ent Update Doc was moved out of the active only corr forum (which I was not in) and into the corr/glowie forum (which is now active corr only as well). At that time, the Dev from the Live Team that was talking to us about the new Ent proposals said that he was assuming that AFK play was going to be ended through the removal of recursive macros because that's what he had been told to assume.


His team was not doing that project it sounded like and he was not willing to make any comments on its potential success or failure or even who was going to be doing it, only that he was told it was going to happen and he needed to work under that assumption. All logic and personal insight points to Tyrant as the voice from above that was telling him this was going to happen.


Tyrant left with in a few days of that post.


***


While Tyrant is in many ways my own personal hero (I heart the once and future Tyrant always ), as a Dancer and a Dancer Corr, I never really felt like the recursive macro nerf was really the same issue as our own Prof issue with Botting and AFK leveling. I was much more comfortable with the approach of changing the way Entertaining is actually performed to make it much more action based and not in game macroable through the use of normal ui type preventions... and then follow up with a strong crack down on any 3rd party macroing for Entertaining purposes.


They can do it this way. I think it will work out better for those of us who actually play Ent this way. I think we should go back to asking for this as a Profession group issue. Beyond my personal opinion though, whoever gets the DC spot next most likely will want to look up the above referenced post and follow up with an issue post in the corr forum as soon as he/she gets a feel for the forum and can.




P A N T H U Y GlitterUsagi
M i n d B o d y S p i r i t
Dancer ImageDesigner Doc

Esharra
Mon Mar 28, 2005 1:01 am
#23





Aviada wrote:

So, someone explain something to me.


if they remove 'afk macroing' does that mean we have to sit there and manually hit the flourish button over and over?


I think most dancers who are in favor ofremoving the ability for avatars to be left animating while unattended are not in favor of effecting their ability to run a recursive macro.Many seem to be in favor of reducing afk play while still retaining theability for themselves to go afk for "short" periods even. To others, this seems contradictory. If recursion was removed, you would still have the ability to write macroslong enough to allow you to avoid hitting a key for a few minutes (at least). There are a number of ways that unattended play could be addressed, we'll just have to see where the devs take it.


I mastered dancer while at the keyboard the entire time the first few times I did it and I had a recuring macro going or I would've had carpel tunnel syndrome. Is this what the entertainer community is wanting?


Some,like myself, don't use macros muchat all and would be rather annoyed if our avatars were doing the same thing over & over again, with no variation. Everyone has their own preferences.




Esharra ěsh-äŕ-rä, noun
1. Entertainer
2. Bounty Hunter
3. Smuggler

"One man's oddity is another man's routine." -Bertos Goodner (a dancer)


Ihareo
Mon Mar 28, 2005 2:28 am
#24






Esharra wrote:






Ihareo wrote:





Esharra wrote:





Aviada wrote:

So, someone explain something to me.


if they remove 'afk macroing' does that mean we have to sit there and manually hit the flourish button over and over?


I think most dancers who are in favor ofremoving the ability for avatars to be left animating while unattended are not in favor of effecting their ability to run a recursive macro.Many seem to be in favor of reducing afk play while still retaining theability for themselves to go afk for "short" periods even. To others, this seems contradictory. If recursion was removed, you would still have the ability to write macroslong enough to allow you to avoid hitting a key for a few minutes (at least). There are a number of ways that unattended play could be addressed, we'll just have to see where the devs take it.


I mastered dancer while at the keyboard the entire time the first few times I did it and I had a recuring macro going or I would've had carpel tunnel syndrome. Is this what the entertainer community is wanting?


Some,like myself, don't use macros muchat all and would be rather annoyed if our avatars were doing the same thing over & over again, with no variation. Everyone has their own preferences.








Esharra, you know I respect you deeply. However, you know that you can't expect everyone to play your way just because you play that way.


Some of us need recursive macros. period.


When I want variation, I switch to a different macro.






I have no problem with recursive macros. Nothing in my post states that I have a problem with recursive macros. Nor do I have a problem with non-recursive macros. I don't use macros..recursive or otherwise..that does not mean that I'm against their use. I just have more fun..am less bored..without them. So..for the record..I don't have a problem with macro use. I do have a problem with unattended play.


Frankly, I don't think removing recursion is the solution to the problem of unattended play. I don't see a policy change as a manageable solutionthough.


(About the only thing I Do have a problem with thatI hinted at in my previous post,is players saying they want to get rid of unattended play but still want to retain the ability to play unattended themselves. I'm just a little intolerent of the hypocrisy in that train of thought.)


Message Edited by Esharra on 03-27-2005 04:38 PM





Ok I misunderstood, I'm sorry.




Ihareo Imtame--Adept of the Force
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000


Ihareo
Mon Mar 28, 2005 2:33 am
#25






Ravanne_Esi wrote:

I doubt that AFK Buffbotting will ever be taken out of the game other than by EULA enforcement. If they try to remove or highly modify the macro system at this time I would suspect that it would cause more problems than it would be worth, probably breaking many current systems.And almost anyother system they put in to enforce it would cause more problems for legitimate users of the game than it would for buffbotters.








AFKing will prolly go away when our community comes up with a reasonable solution.


As an example, I point to the combat professions. Recently they had the ability to initiate an attak while AFK removed. That happned because their community got together and came up with a reasonable solution.


So far, in the Entertainer community, anyone who has come up with a solution other than removing recursive macros has been flamed to oblivion. Now, here we are, still have recursive macros AND our AFK problem wheras the combat professions have recursive macros, and no more AFK problem.


I personally take that as a sign to start thinking of reasonable ways to curtail the AFK problem.





Ihareo Imtame--Adept of the Force
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000


LyteFoot
Mon Mar 28, 2005 5:01 am
#26

AFK macro looting is very much alive Ihareo they just had to learn to leave the AFK flag off. I still see plenty of zombies at all the popular spawn spots. The "fix" the devs put in was way to easy to get around and only put a bump in the way through lack of knowledge. Unfortunately there are way to many professional AFK players so knowledge spread quickly on the work around.



Elwyn LyteFoot - Corbantis server
Page 2 of 4