Carbineer Archive
Thread: ScatterShot debate: Something is wrong.
NEVER look at the Combat Log for multi-pool hits....you must look at the numbers over your head.... I can MOST CERTAINLY without ANY doubt confirm that armor resistances stop these shots, but not sure about the AR/AP issue.
The Combat Logmakes it quite difficult to test ScatterShot1/2 unfortunately.
My DXR6, Elite, E11, and EE3 are all about the same DPS so I could test this out some more if necessary (I have 3 accounts so it is easy to verify EXACTLY what is going on).
jfang wrote:
The point in my post is that the armor damage reduction *was* logged, so the lack of a synth steak logging damage reductionmight be significant. For that matter, if synth steak does prevent damage, might this be a way to burn through the resistances? (Synth prevents 30 normal hits, but since scatter hits two pools on average, it will only help against 15 scatter shot hits?)
As I read your last post, the damage reduction logged in the logs does not equal the real damage reduction. For example, if scatter normally does 100 damage, you might do 50 damage on an armored person but the logs only say the armor prevented 25 damage (leaving 25 damage unaccounted for).
Can you confirm that this is what you meant? Thanks.
Synthsteak only reports on ONE hit of ScatterShot. And ScatterShot2 has 3 hits, ScatterShot1 does the 2 hits your reference. This is where I believe the Multi-Pool shots of all professions are gaining the advantage....on the second and third hits. Of course that is all unconfirmed right now so who really knows....the Devs sure don't ![]()
I would have to go through the testing again to remember which way the "extra" damage was going. Don't remember if I was taking more or less than my 85% Comp Suit. It seems like I was taking less damage than I should be, like 5% or less so no big deal either way.
1) No and No
2) Not sure yet, will find out soon
3) Pretty sure only armor gets all 3 hits, not 100% yet
4) Hope to test in 1-2 weeks afterI have two Master Carbineers ![]()
5) Not sure yet, will find out soon