Bounty Hunter Archive

Thread: Why failed missions should not get BH on the terms

REDLION78
Sat Jun 11, 2005 2:59 pm
#14

This will only lead to theExclusive hunting of low level Paddies Now whos for it?
Actairr
Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:04 pm
#15

I want to be hunted as well just so jedi will stop complaining so much about it. Actually if they have smugglers get hunted I thought of going smuggler just so I could get hunted, it would be so thrilling to be hunted.
Bandkanon
Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:05 pm
#16

Mr. and Mrs. Smith ;P



You get spotted ur on the list!



Hiam Amar - Eclipse


Fheyla Amar - Bria



black666label
Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:05 pm
#17






Actairr wrote:
I want to be hunted as well just so jedi will stop complaining so much about it. Actually if they have smugglers get hunted I thought of going smuggler just so I could get hunted, it would be so thrilling to be hunted.





Lol


Yeah i want to make a smuggler alt.





and the rituals that fade away, and the roses that cease to be laid, and it's clear to me that we're one foot in a very shallow grave

Syrus Ardrax
~~ Master Bounty Hunter | Master Rifleman | Pistoleer~~
~~AoX~~
~~Art of Execution~~
~~44 Jedi Killed~~
Chilastra Novice Troll
Made by Lexxin
GriffinsMyth
Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:10 pm
#18

Add in the multi BH per Jedi option (its been brought up before, so read that before you think I'm in favour of gank squads on Paddys) and I'm all for BH on the terms for failing consistantly. If anything it'll make us BH toughen up a little and that would hopefully have negative affects on the Jedi population.
Ryushi78
Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:15 pm
#19

BH should absolutely NOT go on the terms. Even if he fails a mission. The reason why smugglers should go on terms for failed smuggling missions is because the contractor is loosing alot of money. You lost his briefcase full of drugs and now you gotta pay up. If a BH fails his mission there's no loss in it for the contractor so why should he want to put him on the terms? That's just stupid. Besides, the contractors don't always hire a bountyhunter, they post a bounty and bountyhunters compete for the prize. Half the time the contractor doesn't even know who's on the job.

BeyondtheGrave2
Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:17 pm
#20

i have no problem with being hunted. I just that this ill turn bh against bh when we should unite to fight the jedi.( i don't mean groups hunting jedi) I am a master smuggler as well and have no problem being on the terms for that.
Deathfire
Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:19 pm
#21






Typeso wrote:

come on, it's logical to think multiple failed missions will put you on the terms.... means you can't get the job done for your contractor, and your contractor is tired of you being a failure. Same should go for smugglers when/IF they ever get a revamp. I don't mind being on the terms, just means i have to step up my game and not cruise coro like a noob waving my saber at everyone.



Right so lets say for example as like happened earlier on I go to lok, reach my mark and they start to run, they are less then 2m's from a house door and I manage to root. I shoot and shoot, and they heal and heal until the root wears off and run into said house. So really what am I meant to do with the mission when they do this? Enlighten me. I'll obviously have to abort said mission and *I* may end up being put on the terminals myself for this? Total rubbish.



~"You are Just a puppet...you have no heart...and cannot feel any pain"~Sephiroth
Biffhammer
Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:27 pm
#22

I disagree, you are competeing with another bh, if that bh was faster than you, than quite frankly you lose. No if ands or buts. You lose. That is the the RISK you take by taking a jedi mission........kinda like the risks jedi's take when they hunt in groups, only the jedis will most certainly get vis and go on the boards, at least you have some way to control whether you get on the boards or not.
Biffhammer
Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:28 pm
#23

And yes I am a jedi
GriffinsMyth
Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:28 pm
#24

Which is why I'm in favour of the group option first, and in favour of a TEF for jedi so they cant enter buildings once in BH combat, and I'm also for that BS spouted about /reportjedi in publish 19. Then once thats all be implimented, BH on terms with Smugglers is fine with me.
poopshoot1977
Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:30 pm
#25


Now the bounty hunter will know how it feels to be ganked


Message Edited by poopshoot1977 on 06-11-2005 05:31 PM



color="#ff00ff">X color="#00ff00">n color="#888888">[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ color="#ff0000">Y color="#888888">[[[[ color="#00ff00">nZ face="arial">( color="#00ffcc">gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg face="arial">)
color="#880000">Worf / Beau
color="#00ffcc">Elder Jedi
color="#880000">Imperial Slayer
color="#666666">Shadowfire
( face=webdings> color="#00ffcc">gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg face="arial">) color="#ffff00">Zn face="arial">[[[[ face="wingdings"> color="#ff0000">Y color="#888888">[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ color="#00ff00">n color="#ff00ff">W
color="#cccccc">Please drop all auction winnings at 1215 1331
Naboo

Biffhammer
Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:45 pm
#26

Well the tef thing is working as intended, why try to change it. What should be changed is how often a jedi can place down a house, that is the real problem folks. Jedi placing a home down everytime they get to a mission should be banned, I agree, but why would you folks think the tef system to be changed? Because it is to your disadvantage? Come on, get real, if you are having a problem with the tef system its because you are hunting low lvl jedis anyways, and you have every other advantage over that jedi paddy. Now if this problem was involving high lvl jedi, and they were exploiting the system, than maybe I would listen to this, but I know overall you are just picking on the low lvl's.
Page 2 of 9