Bio Engineer Archive
Thread: The infamous CL10!!!
NancyJ
Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:43 pm
#66
Look if you have a problem with anything anyone says on the forums then report it to the moderator and let them decide if the comments were out of line, personally I dont know exactly what comments you were taking offense too, I think you're being overly sensitive and I'm entitled to hold and express that opinion, I dont personally feel that Kevm made any attack on you, but you accuse him of doing so, if everyone is to be punished because someone takes offense at a comment that had no malice behind it then these forums would be a lot quieter.
As far as I can tell Kevm politely disagreed with you and you accuse him of attacking you, I'm sorry you took offense but I'm not gonna persecute someone who I think has done no wrong.
As for 'expecting better from me', oh puh-lease, have you read any of my posts?
I've played the good girl correspondant role and I got flamed for that too so I might as well be myself. Afterall, I wasnt an SOE ass kisser when I got the job I see no reason to be one now.
I do my job and I damn good at it, if you disagree then PM TH and tell him you want a new correspondant.
At the end of the day I'm a player too, I pay my fees and I'm entitled to my opinions just the same as anyone else and I can say whatever the hell I want as long as its within the forum guidelines, correspondants are not beyond the moderators, we can get banned if they think we're out of line.
As far as I can tell Kevm politely disagreed with you and you accuse him of attacking you, I'm sorry you took offense but I'm not gonna persecute someone who I think has done no wrong.
As for 'expecting better from me', oh puh-lease, have you read any of my posts?
I've played the good girl correspondant role and I got flamed for that too so I might as well be myself. Afterall, I wasnt an SOE ass kisser when I got the job I see no reason to be one now.
I do my job and I damn good at it, if you disagree then PM TH and tell him you want a new correspondant.
At the end of the day I'm a player too, I pay my fees and I'm entitled to my opinions just the same as anyone else and I can say whatever the hell I want as long as its within the forum guidelines, correspondants are not beyond the moderators, we can get banned if they think we're out of line.
Kevm
Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:57 pm
#67
NancyJ wrote:
Look if you have a problem with anything anyone says on the forums then report it to the moderator and let them decide if the comments were out of line, personally I dont know exactly what comments you were taking offense too, I think you're being overly sensitive and I'm entitled to hold and express that opinion, I dont personally feel that Kevm made any attack on you, but you accuse him of doing so, if everyone is to be punished because someone takes offense at a comment that had no malice behind it then these forums would be a lot quieter.
As far as I can tell Kevm politely disagreed with you and you accuse him of attacking you, I'm sorry you took offense but I'm not gonna persecute someone who I think has done no wrong.
Thanks Nancy. Honestly I have no idea where there's an 'attack' anywhere in my posts. Questions, comments, disagreement, yes, but no personal attacks. The only 'smug' comment came after being accused of putting words in his mouth. Ah well, sometimes the very nature of written communications causes these types of things I guess.
Novock
Sat Sep 04, 2004 4:00 pm
#68
"I dont personally feel that Kevm made any attack on you, but you accuse him of doing so" Where did I say anywhere that Kevm offend me or attacked me? Matter of fact I said I was not angry nor ever was and I certainly didn't accuse Kevm of anything. I was simply speaking to the nature of thread and in general, remember it was Kevm who replied to my comments and took acception at my comments not the other way around. I simply corrected the misinterpretations of my comments to which he replied with sarcasm. This simply provoked me to my original thoughts, whyis it thatthose with the minority opinion must be cut down in the thread and hence posed the question again.I simply posed the question when one disagrees with the majority whymust one be cut down in this thread. To which I'm told to chill. So be it. Obviously you like the way the forums flow and believe them to be fine and don't believe someone like me has a place in your forum. I spoke to you with respect you reply with profanity. Again never said you should brown nose SOE simply stated that I had a right just as much as anyone else to post on the forums and I had a rigth just as much as anyone else to expect the forums to be a respectful place. BTW never asked you to punish anyone simply voiced my opinion that you shouldn't encourage such activity. Obviously I found myself in the minority once again and I wish you well.
NancyJ
Sat Sep 04, 2004 4:03 pm
#70
Novock wrote:Hmm, i figured it wouldn't take long before someone made a direct quote and attacked my words
Kevm
Sat Sep 04, 2004 4:05 pm
#71
Novock wrote:
"I dont personally feel that Kevm made any attack on you, but you accuse him of doing so"
Where did I say anywhere that Kevm offend me or attacked me? Matter of fact I said I was not angry nor ever was and I certainly didn't accuse Kevm of anything.
LOL I can't imagine why I would think you accused me of attacking you. Oh wait. Yes I do:
Novock wrote:
Why does every statement you make end with somesmug remarkor attack against me?
Novock
Sat Sep 04, 2004 4:08 pm
#72
The quote is attacked my words not me on your wuote NancyJ, yes you're right Kevm after your sensitivity comment I did ask you why you attacked me you corrected me there.
NancyJ
Sat Sep 04, 2004 4:13 pm
#73
Novock wrote:The quote is attacked my words not me on your wuote NancyJ, yes you're right Kevm after your sensitivity comment I did ask you why you attacked me you corrected me there.
Now you're just arguing over semantics.
Why cant we all kiss and make up?
In the words of the great Bill and Ted: Be Excellent to each other!
Novock
Sat Sep 04, 2004 4:27 pm
#76
Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey was the best... just my opinion.
Still think you're a good correspondent just disagree obviously on this matter.
Wish you both the best and as I see I am a disruption not desired in this community I will restrainl from making future comments in the Bio Engineering thread. You win Kevm I'm gone.
Anyone reading this you have a great correspondent to which Iknow will continue to work for the BE community(dirty mouth though :smileyvery-happy
please ingore any of my comments made in this thread and don't let me be a distraction. I wish the community the best of luck.
please ingore any of my comments made in this thread and don't let me be a distraction. I wish the community the best of luck.
SkyPreacher1
Sat Sep 04, 2004 4:40 pm
#77
Kevm.
You are correct, at the moment we aren't viable because every creature has been nerfed, not just the pets. As well what makes us non-viable as CH's is the many bugs that plague our pets. I am hoping some of those issues will be addressed in the mythical Combat Revamp.
SkyPreacher1
Sat Sep 04, 2004 4:45 pm
#78
Amana,
Why does there need to be a tanking pet for the non-ch class?
If a master TKA walks up to an enraged Rancor lair, he can take it down in 30 seconds, the whole thing. What good does a pet do him?
Master Swordsman can tank better than my pets, they last longer and they deal more damage. They don't store, their specials work, and they don't run away. I am confused, noobs may need a pet but once they hit any novice elite combat profession the need for a pet disappears.
So like I said to Kevm, to some extent, the introduction of these non-ch monstrosities does effect us a CH's. I also know that the answer will come from above but maybe we can have some kind of constructive input into it.
And like I said, I think cloning is the biggest piece and most complicated piece of coding in the game.