Bio Engineer Archive

Thread: What would you do?

ArthurDentOnBria
Mon Dec 29, 2003 4:35 pm
#27

Hmm, well, first I would never knowingly put myself in that position. Auctioning off stuff like that for outrageously high prices brings nothing but trouble and ill-will, even if everything goes well, so I wouldn't do it. I've never charged more than 75k for a pet and probably never will. I just can't justify it based on expenses and effort relative to other things in the economy of this game. But let's say one of thepets I sold was CL 35 and after some post-patch-nerf or whatever it got adjusted to CL 38 or something like that, and it was higher than the CH could control and thus useless to them. That's a perfectly reasonable scenario. What I'd probably offer to do in that case is get them a new CL 35 pet at a big discount (half price or less). That would probably be a reasonable way to handle that situation.




ArthurDent - former Bio Engineer, Tailor, and Droid Engineer
Account cancelled 7/8/05 due to game breaking bugs in these professions that have been neglected for FAR too long. Last day July 27 2005
custom tailoring and droid orders welcome. "making Evil products since July 2003"
Achiever: 80%, Explorer: 60%, Socializer: 46%, Killa 13%


Orew
Mon Dec 29, 2003 4:41 pm
#28

Why should anyone "hotfix" such a pet? So many months after release I assume the game is working as intended.


Sooo... sarcasm aside... any pet that looks much better than a pre-nerf rock beetle probably will be nerfed sooner or later. If you buy such a pet you do it at your own risk and you deserve to loose your money.


The BE who crafted it shouldn't refund any money... but he probably should be banned for a couple of days for using an exploit.





Mr. Smedley's immortal words:
There are long threads that I've started myself on our forums, but we have community representatives that are answering questions diligently on our forums already, and I'm very involved in what's being said.

Mr. Smedley's user statistics when the above statement was made:
Date Registered 05-03-2005 02:11 PM
Total Posts 1
AnitaSWG
Mon Dec 29, 2003 4:58 pm
#29






Orew wrote:

Sooo... sarcasm aside... any pet that looks much better than a pre-nerf rock beetle probably will be nerfed sooner or later. If you buy such a pet you do it at your own risk and you deserve to loose your money.





This is a good point - and one I failed to consider in my "moral issue" posed here.


And, if a person is savvy enough to read the auction boards, he/she is probably reading the server forums and maybe a few profession boards as well. So, maybe it should be buyer beware.


So, perhaps it's not this 2.25M beauty, but one yousell outside the starport in Coronet to someone for their entire life savings of 15K. They don't read message boards, and all they know is they got a cool pet that can tank for them, helping them solo. They just started playing last week, and didn't know about the CH changes.


Do you refund their money when they can't call the new pet?


Ri'a




:+: In Good Taste ~ Keren/Naboo ~ 1180, 3720 :+:
Ri'a Ocoli ~ *Cancelled*
Saori Eiwaki ~ *Cancelled*
Jaira Zelona ~ *Cancelled*

Paradisio
Mon Dec 29, 2003 5:13 pm
#30

3/1


I probably wouldn't sell one to begin with... but more than likely the person buying knows the risk already and I would probably warn them so as well.

JiveTimeMofo
Mon Dec 29, 2003 5:40 pm
#31

something like that is an obvious mistake. but will the dev's change it? do they have the resources to? it's not like nerfing the pets before b/c they were all based on the same stats. so all they had to do was update the stats on that particular pet.


with BE pets each one is unique. would they go through the trouble of nerfing every single one of them or will they just not make them reproducable any more.


they didn't nerf the existing fwg5, scatter pistols and launchers. i still have a couple dozen fwg5s and scatters that do 77-200+ dmg unsliced.


the existing probot didn't get changed when the first nerf came around. they just couldn't be made again.


so maybe we need to pump out all the baddass pets we can while we can


but in your case, with that much money on the line i'd refund and give him a free pet for his/her troubles.


selling them for 25-40k isn't prob if they get nerfed. odd are that the buyer got his use out it by either xp gained or from taking on mission he/she wouldn't have solo'ed themselves.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jivetime Mofo

Master TKA/Novice Rifleman
Paradisio
Mon Dec 29, 2003 5:47 pm
#32

My thoughts exactly, they generally don't change the old ones, they just make new ones impossible.


Not to menion, if they fix this, the chance of them borking other things is probably pretty high for us, considering how fragile our class seems to be.

Taduc
Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:07 pm
#33

If they have +2 million to spend on a pet, then they have credits to burn. Just tell them it's a bugged pet and is at their own risk.



--
Taduc
--
darthkoodar
Mon Dec 29, 2003 10:25 pm
#34

1)



If AMERICA outlaws hog hunting the last true test for bulldogs will be gone. They have already outlawed bull baiting and pit fighting. If AMERICA loses its bulldogs AMERICA will lose its courage and will be its downfall!!!!
meroc
Mon Dec 29, 2003 11:59 pm
#35

I think Caveat Emptor applies as much in games as it does in "real life" and If I didn't beak it, I won't fix it/pay for it, it's up to the people that did break it to fix it/pay for it.


Of course, your assuming it is a bug/exploit, and you know what they say about assuming things...




Meroc

Taipan's Pet's and Bio Tissues, Anchorhead, Tatooine 430 -5000, Ahazi
Master Bio Engineer, Master Creature Handler, Part time Pistoleer.
BECalc 2.0, the Clone and Tissue Pricing tool for Bio Engineers
Version 1.x mirrored on SWG Warcry
vexingthought
Tue Dec 30, 2003 12:15 am
#36

While I'm not a BE I think it would depend very much on the amount of time the person got to use the pet. I mean if it got nerfed the next day I'd probably refund the guy some of his money and make him the best new pet I could. If was changed 3 weeks later, hell no. He got his money's worth on the pet. Even then I might give him a discount on a replacement pet considering his generous contribution to my SWG retirement fund.



_________________________________________________________
Carbineer: Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse

- Udey
Anubi
Tue Dec 30, 2003 2:38 am
#37

Sell it with the warning that the sale is final and nothing in the game is set in stone. The pet could get nerfed next week, or not.


The armor I am wearing could get nerfed, or a better suit could could come out (due to better available resources) the next day. I once paid 25:1 for some colat iron when colat had not spawned on my server for 3 months. I then took the colat and traded it to an armorsmith in exchange for some pretty good armor. Three days after that deal was done, and I had my armor in hand, some colat spawned. It was nearly as good as the colat I paid 25:1 for, and was selling at 4:1 the day it spawned. Did I pitch a fit at the guy who sold me the iron, or the smith who made it into a suit?


No.


I dropped 4 heavies on the new colat iron.


I think that most people who play this game, regardless of whether or not they read the forums, are very much aware that just about anything is subject to change.


Now, a related question for those who like to apply RL morals and/or ethics to games:


Would you experiment on animals?


How about killing them just for the hell of it?


Sell drugs?


Illegally modify weapons?


Kill other people for the cash in their pocket?


Kill other people to get in good with the enemies of those people?


I guess the point that I am making is that, IRL, I would not be a bio-engineer. I don't kill anything living except by necessity. I have a friend who is an exterminator who goes nuts when I say "well, he don't eat much" when referring to the mouse that lives under my dishwasher. I do eat meat, and have on occaision hunted, but I am not wasteful with any food because I hold life sacred. I recognize that humans are omnivorous, but if I am not planning on eating it, I do not kill something, nor do I have it killed on my behalf. I do not do or sell drugs, I do not illegally modify weapons, and I do not get into fights except in my own self defense.


But this is a GAME, people. It is an escape. I enjoy pretending that I am killing other people because it is a test of skill without any real harm done. I get the same thrill from winning a game of chess (or lack of thrill if I am facing a particularly inept opponent). This does not make me any more imoral than if my character made a lot of cash from selling creatures that may or may not be nerfed in the future, but I kinda have to wonder about the thought process of people that think the latter is worse than the first.




Ramon Sevigne, VP Resource Development, Pariah Inc.
Etienne Sevigne, Pariah Bio-Tech
AnitaSWG
Tue Dec 30, 2003 6:15 am
#38






Anubi wrote:

Now, a related question for those who like to apply RL morals and/or ethics to games:


Would you experiment on animals?


How about killing them just for the hell of it?


Sell drugs?


Illegally modify weapons?


Kill other people for the cash in their pocket?


Kill other people to get in good with the enemies of those people?


I guess the point that I am making is that, IRL, I would not be a bio-engineer. I don't kill anything living except by necessity. I have a friend who is an exterminator who goes nuts when I say "well, he don't eat much" when referring to the mouse that lives under my dishwasher. I do eat meat, and have on occaision hunted, but I am not wasteful with any food because I hold life sacred. I recognize that humans are omnivorous, but if I am not planning on eating it, I do not kill something, nor do I have it killed on my behalf. I do not do or sell drugs, I do not illegally modify weapons, and I do not get into fights except in my own self defense.


But this is a GAME, people. It is an escape. I enjoy pretending that I am killing other people because it is a test of skill without any real harm done. I get the same thrill from winning a game of chess (or lack of thrill if I am facing a particularly inept opponent). This does not make me any more imoral than if my character made a lot of cash from selling creatures that may or may not be nerfed in the future, but I kinda have to wonder about the thought process of people that think the latter is worse than the first.






Well, there is a difference here.. or at least I meant there to be. I am applying RL morals in my dealings with other player characters, not NPC's. I will not justify stealing from someone "just because it's a game." I am honest and upfront in all business dealings. If a player buys something from me and it disappears due to a bug, I replace it free of charge. I also have my own personal ethics when I play. I won't take advantage of exploits in any way shape or form, whether it be bugged missions, duping credits, or whatever.


Now on some of your other questions. Irarely kill NPC humanoids because I don't like it. It makes me uncomfortable. I don't PvP but I know I'm in the minority in that regard. A friend once asked me to kill him so he could get a free trip back to the cloning center and I wouldn't do it. Even though it is "just a game."/shrug


Now back to the subject of this thread.. I think my whole premise is flawed. As someone else pointed out, people have millions to burn.. and they know these pets are bugged. They don't care. They are hoping that the dev's leave the existing pets alone when the fixes go in, and are willing to bet millions on the outcome. So, if any come back and complain when the pets are nerfed, I'd say a fair response is #1. As long as they were warned up front.


It's all speculation anyhow.. hopefully we will get some answers next week. Until then, I'm just gonna keep making my mid-level clones that aren't as good as the level 10's other people are making. /sigh


Ri'a




:+: In Good Taste ~ Keren/Naboo ~ 1180, 3720 :+:
Ri'a Ocoli ~ *Cancelled*
Saori Eiwaki ~ *Cancelled*
Jaira Zelona ~ *Cancelled*

Tal-N
Tue Dec 30, 2003 6:34 am
#39

If I had sold it I've give them a replacement. Personally though now I don't intend to put myself into that situation.



Tal-N Chratk
Ahazi Master Bioengineer / Hunt Master / Rifleman
______________________
Tal'N Chratk
Shadowfire Bounterhunter / Commando

Page 3 of 15