Bio Engineer Archive
Thread: CL 10 : BE Pet vs Combat Droid
Sodan-droiddreamer wrote:
Wow. 8k health is even better than our pld probot with 40% medium armor.
GeminiMoon wrote:
from the BE forums (general info)
1) No new invalid pet checks coming anytime soon, so yes the 8k health cl 10 creatures will still be usebale
2) Even though no new pet checks are coming soon, they are still considered too high and something will be done, yet look who has to take care of it...so it will be a while
Well I think we shouldn't take this data as a basis comparaison.
Thoses are uber pets, I think the 4k ham is more reasonable
Even we all know, soon or later, something will be done to balance those high end pets.
Ty for the Data of all BE, greatly appreciated!
The example you gave of the cl10 Bantha (inyour DE thread)is typical of a cl10 pet.
There are some BEs whopush it in the8-10kish range (and I've heard reports of even getting high hams **and** high kinetics res) but our BE corresponded reported a week or so ago that the BE dev has stated that even the 4kish ham pets arent intended....
So I would say that it looks like our pets will be capped in the 2-4k range max....
Hope that helps some 
Vezek i can make...
cl 10 kwi
2800 health
2800 action
4600 mind
resits: 14 kin
specials: strong posion
dmg: 70
i am a bio eng i made these cl 10 creature..
cl 10 kwi
2800 health
2800 action
4600 mind
resits: 14 kin
specials: strong posion
dmg: 70
Yes thank you very much for the data. Always very interesting to have the data from real and devoted players :smileywink:
SomeUser wrote:
The example you gave of the cl10 Bantha (inyour DE thread)is typical of a cl10 pet.
There are some BEs whopush it in the8-10kish range (and I've heard reports of even getting high hams **and** high kinetics res) but our BE corresponded reported a week or so ago that the BE dev has stated that even the 4kish ham pets arent intended....
So I would say that it looks like our pets will be capped in the 2-4k range max....
Hope that helps some
loomis001 wrote:
i can make...
cl 10 kwi
2800 health
2800 action
4600 mind
resits: 14 kin
specials: strong posion
dmg: 70
SaraeItha wrote:
I remember when everyone was running around and there was nothing on the server except CDEFs. I think that is when they did the droid engineer designs.
But that is the whole problem, we havn't moved on since those CDEF server startup daysat all.
New things are in, buffs for everyone, chef foods, MOBS got stronger to balance the uber leet combat dudes, hell even the lairs were made tougher along the way..remember that one?
And the old Probot was too tough..so Raph (aka HOLOCRON) said a temporary nerf is needed until we get fixed... ... ...temporary??? There is now moss growing on the walls of our 'temporary' shelter.
And in DE...absolutely nothing to keep up the initial level so called 'playing field'
We have been abused since birth, and now we are supposed to love those who abuse us over and over again, most recently with the armour nerf. Well, I dont know, but if we were dogs somebody would be arrested for treating us all like this.
TK says the Devs dont like coming here because it is so negative....well if they were as abused as we have been they would be negative too...its cause and effect in action.
Remove the armour nerf and lets move on to happier days...PUB 7 would be 'ok' without that.
Yeah, reminds me that entertaienrs could not buff at first, if I recall correctly.
Shian_Tavkin wrote:
OK double posting..I am at my wit's end so I don't care anymore:
SaraeItha wrote:
I remember when everyone was running around and there was nothing on the server except CDEFs. I think that is when they did the droid engineer designs.
But that is the whole problem, we havn't moved on since those CDEF server startup daysat all.
New things are in, buffs for everyone, chef foods, MOBS got stronger to balance the uber leet combat dudes, hell even the lairs were made tougher along the way..remember that one?
And the old Probot was too tough..so Raph (aka HOLOCRON) said a temporary nerf is needed until we get fixed... ... ...temporary??? There is now moss growing on the walls of our 'temporary' shelter.
And in DE...absolutely nothing to keep up the initial level so called 'playing field'
We have been abused since birth, and now we are supposed to love those who abuse us over and over again, most recently with the armour nerf. Well, I dont know, but if we were dogs somebody would be arrested for treating us all like this.
TK says the Devs dont like coming here because it is so negative....well if they were as abused as we have been they would be negative too...its cause and effect in action.
Remove the armour nerf and lets move on to happier days...PUB 7 would be 'ok' without that.
My usual CL 10 pets are 6k/4k/2k, with about 20% kinetic and vuln to all else, with about 35-45 damage. I personally don't think that's too high, but the devs do.
(And no, I don't think they're not too high just because I can make them; I can also make the 10k health ones after I accidentally stumbled across the recipe, but I don't)
Ty for your update Jenden, I edited the data in the main post, did I missed something this time?
Jenden wrote:
Not that it makes a huge difference, but the droid HAMs on TC have been uped a bit. R3 is at 1800 I think (may be 1600, not positive) and probot is 1100.
Message Edited by Arnwald on 03-16-2004 12:17 AM
Aeneus wrote:
shhhh we arent supposed to notice they arent as effective as a creature.... I'm still under the assumption they believe this isnt star wars but pok_emon wars
Nothing has changed it that regard...Raph's dream lives on. I would bet real money he sleeps with some kind of exotic creature, he loves them so much.
More fool me for following him from UO.
Ohh and as an aside, my brother cancelled his SWG account today, and guess what, my chars are still alive and well in UO he tells me...my house decayed but everything else is AOK...nice ..and tempting.
At the very least Greywolfe listened to the players in UO forums..a lesson I sent a message to TH about, but he can't hear anymore it seems.
Harsh, probably. Honest, certainly.
Constructive? It would be if they listened.