Tailor Archive
Thread: Question sent to the devs 4/20/04
KnnOs
Wed Apr 21, 2004 11:15 am
#41
I'd vote but it would seem the time for voting is past. I should get on the forums more often. At any rate the question looks good, direct, and polite. We'll see what sort of response we can get. Good luck and good work!
MasterJian
Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:22 pm
#42
ZahrIna wrote:I'd actually vote for #5, becuase I prefer accountability. I honestly think they were talking about the ID's though. /shrug.
Yeah.. I guess really since it is a "question" we are asking, not a request for a fix or anything.. If I could ask anything I wanted of the Devs, I would ask why it is that they give us responses to our top 5 issues that give in indication that they are actually working on the issue or that a fix is coming, and yet 4 months later, nothing.. Well, nothing unless you count an unneeded, uncalled for socket nerf.. I'm afraid that if they actually do answer #8 all we will get is another false promise to hang onto for yet another 4 months.. That just seems to be the pattern for our proffession.. But, I guess I'm getting kinda jaded.. Shame on me..
MouseBot
Wed Apr 21, 2004 5:05 pm
#43
For me it doesn't really matter which question we ask. First, one question every second week is an insult to the community. Second, the devs word aren't worth anything any longer, they've lied too many times. Third, most of the items on the list in the initial post are things that they should have fixed a long time ago, we shouldn't have to beg for it.
NJ62
Wed Apr 21, 2004 5:21 pm
#44
Well let's see what this question produces, and then I'll put up the new voting thread for 2 weeks from today. Next time, I can submit early (like mondayish) which will gain us dev brownie points.
Aynianu
Wed Apr 21, 2004 5:22 pm
#45
#8 is my first vote, next up would be new schematics, but the 0/0 thing needs sorting and shouldnt even be an issue for OUR proffession but for a general bug fix in the game itself
NJ62
Wed Apr 21, 2004 5:40 pm
#46
Well I think when the plan was Wednesday, it meant due on Wednesday. Not sure when the answers are coming out but probably before the next batch is due next Wednesday. I still want to hold off on voting next question until we get our answer to this one because the answer we get will definitely help in deciding what other types of questions to ask.
NJ62
Wed Apr 21, 2004 10:58 pm
#49
Voting for next question (in 2 weeks) on this thread = verboten. Me not able to count... brain explode. When I put up the new thread, I'll count those votes.
NJ62
Thu Apr 22, 2004 12:47 am
#50
This was sprung on me sometime Monday afternoon, and the corres that don't have their questions in were tsk tsked as of this morning (hah but mine was in!). I would have given more time if it were possible.
Kirranas
Thu Apr 22, 2004 1:09 am
#51
ERM,
I am sorry but I think our next question should be WHAT THE HECK IS THE RUBBISH SONY ???. They grant us answering 1 question every two weeks and we sit around voting on which question we want to ask them. The question should be why. Its a damn joke what kind of customer service is this its like having a magic wish rather than having a community rep. I am sure TH and sony are busy but heck they can only spent 5 minutes every two weeks to answer a question is that really our level of support ?.
Sorry I dont even want to ask them a question, I know they are aware of the probems with the profession and I could answer most of the top 5 issues myself when posed as questions. All they have to answer in most cases are yes, no and will be fixed soon and what we are going to happy with this ?
The issue here is that Sony should be fixing thebugs we have, which in some cases we have had from day one. To they seem to be avoiding this by seeming to give us this question time but in fact they are trying to pull the wool over our eyes by not fixing the problems. In the past we have had our questions answered each month anyway sorry this is a step backwards not forwards.
IrisesLise
Thu Apr 22, 2004 4:35 am
#52
Definately #8.
Lets fix the bug then get new schematics instead of more bugged schematics 