Tailor Archive
Thread: Our next question: (Really really really delayed)
NJ62 wrote:Okay, well, would you want the metal palette changed as well?
I, personally, would like to see a true yellow-gold color added to the palette. I just don't think any of the existing colors really look right.
Also I couldn't help but notice a seeming contradiction in the top 20 you sent to the devs.
* Concerns about NOT wanting limited-use schematics
.
.
.
* Professions left out from limited use schems
o armorsmith
o musician
o bioengineer
o combat medic
o artisan
Which kinda says that on the one hand there is opposition to the limited use schematics, but while they're at it they should consider making a few more for these professions. I'm not trying to pick on you, NJ, I just thought I should point that out.
Anyway, back to the regularly scheduled thread. Go colors!
Shi'ann
Hot Pink Twi'lek of Mystery
(Who has mastered the clicky!)
DanceRulez wrote:
NJ62 wrote:
Okay, well, would you want the metal palette changed as well?
I, personally, would like to see a true yellow-gold color added to the palette. I just don't think any of the existing colors really look right.
Also I couldn't help but notice a seeming contradiction in the top 20 you sent to the devs.
* Concerns about NOT wanting limited-use schematics
.
.
.
* Professions left out from limited use schems
o armorsmith
o musician
o bioengineer
o combat medic
o artisan
Which kinda says that on the one hand there is opposition to the limited use schematics, but while they're at it they should consider making a few more for these professions. I'm not trying to pick on you, NJ, I just thought I should point that out.I actually argued for the limited use schematics in the thread regarding the suggested TKM schematic. I think that they add some an element of uniqueness and rarity to certain items.
Anyway, back to the regularly scheduled thread. Go colors!
Shi'ann
Hot Pink Twi'lek of Mystery
(Who has mastered the clicky!)
Yeah we don't want any more, but it's not fair to leave those professions out. This is more of a "global gripe" than a tailor gripe. Fair is fair.
ArthurDentOnBria wrote:
I think one thing we might want to consider adding to our "top lists" is that business about increasing the crate size of tailored components (to 100? 200? or whatever). At fanfest, this is about the only thing that they seemed even half-way motivated to do for us (presumably because it would be trivial to implement). I'm in no way saying that this issue (to me) merits a top-10 or top-5 standing, but just that it might be something that we could actually expect to get done. Dunno, worth considering.
I think the architects are on the warpath about this, or a similar issue. They want resource stacks bigger, and I think crates go along with that. I think the concern is that storage space limitations prevent monopolies from the top crafters, and storage should be a crunch, regardless of the database issues, or lack thereof.
Anyway, before I go spouting off on this behind the scenes, I'll yap a bit with Dvnce and see what is going on from that end.
Honestly, I know we need a new top list, a bunch of things have come up in the last 2 months, and I was kind of on-the-spot asked to resubmit the list to Greenmarine at Fanfest, so I hastily added some issues that have come up, because time was an issue, but I wasn't really asked to add in more stuff for them to do (heheh). I'm not entirely sure when the issues in THIS list will be addressed, but it's getting to the 3 month mark soon, so we could redo it if you want.