CUEmu - Thread Posts

MoraninGlory

Wed Apr 07, 2004 11:17 am

#14

1) I want socketing to be in our top 5

yes

2) I want socketing to be put back the way it was

yes

3) If reinstating the old system is not an option (the likely scenario)

I want resource quality alone to affect sockets

yes

I want experimentation & resource quality to affect sockets

no

I want to keep it random

no

4) I would like use-based clothing decay to be implemented

yes

5) I would like to be able to affect the overall durability of an item

yes

I want resource quality alone to affect overall durability

no

I want experimentation & resource quality to affect overall durability

yes

I don't want the durability of new items to ever be lower than 1000

no

I'd support changes that give us some active role in crafting other than color selection. If the dev's feel there's some compelling reason to decrease the # of sockets (why I can't comprehend) then it should be done through some form of quality of resource or experimentation system not just a nerfed dice roll.

Moranin Glory

Master Tailor

Master Artisan

Novice Rifleman

ex-Master Dancer, Entertainer, Merchant

CORE Recruitment Officer

Shop locations on Naboo, Corellia and Talus

Boatillo

Wed Apr 07, 2004 11:34 am

#15

1) I want socketing to be in our top 5

a) yes

2) I want socketing to be put back the way it was

a) yes

3) If reinstating the old system is not an option (the likely scenario)

I want resource quality alone to affect sockets

b) no

I want experimentation & resource quality to affect sockets

b) no

I want to keep it random

a) yes

4) I would like use-based clothing decay to be implemented

b) no

5) I would like to be able to affect the overall durability of an item

b) no - it should stay at 1000, period

I want resource quality alone to affect overall durability

b) no

I want experimentation & resource quality to affect overall durability

b) no

I don't want the durability of new items to ever be lower than 1000

a) yes

Please, please, please, please, please, please DO NOT make tailors into AS's....I like having the idea of a few items (ie wookie segs) being tied to resource quality and experimentation - but to start be forced to pay 20+ cpu for good hides JUST so that I can get a good number or sockets or quality inEVERY clothing item is a PAIN IN THE ASS!

This will end the ability of Tailors to keep their vendors stocked, who the hell wants to hand-make (for colors) and experiment EVERY single item you make! It is bad enough getting enough cruddy hides to make all the clothes, but this change could potentially force us to compete with AS's for good hides -- and Tailors DO NOT HAVE THE MONEY!

I vote to place a new system in, where a master still has a random socket chance but more weighted like so: 4 sockets (50%) 3 sockets (33%) 2 sockets (10%), 1 socket (5-7%) and NEVER 0 sockets at Master.

12 pt Master Tailor/ID Ipema on Shadowfire

Kayyla Portentia ~~~~~~~ Teräs Käsi Artisté

Curator SV Museum

-2323, 883 Tatooine
Jedi Unlocked 11/16/03

Rizzaka

Wed Apr 07, 2004 11:35 am

#16

1- No

2- No

3- Experimentation and Resources

4- Yes

5- Experimentation and Resources

*edit* oh yeah! if we get this experimentation in place could we PLEASE get it so that master artisans or tailors can craft clothing dye kits? this way it would allow us to do a factory run of clothings and then re color them later. Perhaps this would be crafted by even a master tailor and usable by only tailors?

Message Edited by Rizzaka on 04-07-2004 02:39 PM

Drrty · Bothan of DOOOOOOOM
Zabuza · Demon of the Mist
· Prince of Endor ·
learn to adapt to the situation you have put your character in. i do not need to adapt my proffesion to accomodate yours.

NormalisaMyth

Wed Apr 07, 2004 11:36 am

#17

1) I want socketing to be in our top 5

no

2) I want socketing to be put back the way it was

no

3) If reinstating the old system is not an option (the likely scenario)

I want resource quality alone to affect sockets

b) no

I want experimentation & resource quality to affect sockets

a) yes

I want to keep it random

b) no

4) I would like use-based clothing decay to be implemented

a) yes

5) I would like to be able to affect the overall durability of an item

b) no - it should stay at 1000, period

I want resource quality alone to affect overall durability

b) no

I want experimentation & resource quality to affect overall durability

b) no

I don't want the durability of new items to ever be lower than 1000

a) yes

(Just my 2 cents tho)

Normal Is'a'Myth
Resident Tailor of Mistmore on Dantooine

Wire3k

Wed Apr 07, 2004 11:37 am

#18

I'll make this simple - put it to hell back the way it was before the 'fix'.

A master tailor should NOT get 4 sockets 5% of the time from 95%.

This is little thing from the devs end - it's NOT a little thing from a working tailors end. I've put up with a lot since release, screw with the perception of quality of my goods I'm liable to see if I can get into the WoW beta.

www.swgbio.com
On-line clothing catalog for tailors, bio-engineers and their customers

www.swgbio.com/mom
MMO Musings - Random Observations and my best advice
www.swgbio.com/myadvice.wav

TheRealKillbot

Wed Apr 07, 2004 11:48 am

#19

1)a

2)a

3)b

a

b

4)a

5)a

Mystyrys

Wed Apr 07, 2004 11:51 am

#20

1) I want socketing to be in our top 5

a) Yes

2) I want socketing to be put back the way it was

a) Yes

3) If reinstating the old system is not an option (the likely scenario)

I want resource quality alone to affect sockets

b) No

I want experimentation & resource quality to affect sockets

b) No

I want to keep it random

a) Yes

4) I would like use-based clothing decay to be implemented

b) Yes

5) I would like to be able to affect the overall durability of an item

b) No

I want resource quality alone to affect overall durability

b) No

I want experimentation & resource quality to affect overall durability

b) No

I don't want the durability of new items to ever be lower than 1000

a) Yes

Please, please, please, please, please, please DO NOT make tailors into AS's....I like having the idea of a few items (ie wookie segs) being tied to resource quality and experimentation - but to start be forced to pay 20+ cpu for good hides JUST so that I can get a good number or sockets or quality inEVERY clothing item is a PAIN IN THE ASS!

This will end the ability of Tailors to keep their vendors stocked, who the hell wants to hand-make (for colors) and experiment EVERY single item you make! It is bad enough getting enough cruddy hides to make all the clothes, but this change could potentially force us to compete with AS's for good hides -- and Tailors DO NOT HAVE THE MONEY!

I vote to place a new system in, where a master still has a random socket chance but more weighted like so: 4 sockets (50%) 3 sockets (33%) 2 sockets (10%), 1 socket (5-7%) and NEVER 0 sockets at Master.

12 pt Master Tailor/ID Ipema on Shadowfire

And I agree 100% with what Ipema says above there. If I wanted to be an expert miner, hide purchaser and research scientist, as well as merchant/banker, and spend the majority of my time fiddling with arithmetic, I'd have chosen to be a weaponsmith or armorsmith. I chose tailor because it was casual player friendly, easier... and fun. Please stop making it not fun.

AFK is not OK
Clicky - AFKers are disruptive to my Gameplay - Clicky
**************************************************
Qitu &Tabu
Tailor &Entertainer
**************************************************
*May your future endeavors prove to be
interesting and rewarding experiences that
fulfill your dreams and enrich your life.*

Dex1138

Wed Apr 07, 2004 1:11 pm

#21

Personally, mindless redos to get 4 sockets is not my idea of fun.

Ditto!

1) I want socketing to be in our top 5

b) no

2) I want socketing to be put back the way it was

a) yes

3) If reinstating the old system is not an option (the likely scenario)

I would prefer experience & experimentation be the determining factors

4) I would like use-based clothing decay to be implemented

a) yes

5) I would like to be able to affect the overall durability of an item

Moot point unless current decay system is changed

We are already one of (if not the) least appreciated/paid crafting professions. Having to redo items for max sockets AND compete for quality hides will actually make me start thinking of dropping tailor. Considering I've been on this path since launch and everything that hasn't/has happned to us since then, that's saying quite a bit.

Tol "the Travelling Tailor" Doneeta
* Threads N' Things *
Fine Clothing and Furniture
Master Tailor | Kauri
(no relation to Tott Doneeta)

ZahrIna

Wed Apr 07, 2004 1:24 pm

#22

1) I want socketing to be in our top 5

a) yes

2) I want socketing to be put back the way it was

a) yes

3) If reinstating the old system is not an option (the likely scenario)

I want resource quality alone to affect sockets

b) no

I want experimentation & resource quality to affect sockets

a) yes

I want to keep it random

b) no

4) I would like use-based clothing decay to be implemented

a) yes - **IF it works!! No equipping at 0/0!!

5) I would like to be able to affect the overall durability of an item

b) no - it should stay at 1000, period

I want resource quality alone to affect overall durability

b) no

I want experimentation & resource quality to affect overall durability

b) no

I don't want the durability of new items to ever be lower than 1000

a) yes

Good Luck!!!!!

Zahr'Ina :::: Formerly of Everquest~7th Hammer (4yrs), Everquest II~Steamfont (launch) and Starwars Galaxies~Eclipse (Launch). Choosing to ENJOY my playtime. :::: I wish nothing but happiness to all who remain. Ran out of patience: 6/15/05. Husband and wife team. Four accounts and two station passes, terminated.

Idany

Wed Apr 07, 2004 1:26 pm

#23

NJ62 wrote:

Thank you all for your patience and support during this process!

1) I want socketing to be in our top 5

a) yes

2) I want socketing to be put back the way it was

a) yes

3) If reinstating the old system is not an option (the likely scenario)

I want resource quality alone to affect sockets

b) no

I want experimentation & resource quality to affect sockets

a) yes

I want to keep it random

b) no

4) I would like use-based clothing decay to be implemented (means wearing it lets it decay)

4b) I would likedamage-based clothing decay to be implemented (means fighting with it lets it decay)

a) yes

5) I would like to be able to affect the overall durability of an item

a) yes

I want resource quality alone to affect overall durability

b) no

I want experimentation & resource quality to affect overall durability

a) yes

I don't want the durability of new items to ever be lower than 1000

a) yes

6) I would like to be able to set colors after creating an item so i can do factory runs with experimeneted schematics

and still be able to make unique colored products

a) Yes

Srednii

Wed Apr 07, 2004 1:35 pm

#24

Iwrote:

1) I want socketing to be in our top 5

a) yes

2) I want socketing to be put back the way it was

a) yes

3) If reinstating the old system is not an option (the likely scenario)

Screw that sh't. if the bastards can't add content then they can at least bloody well not nerf the class

4) I would like use-based clothing decay to be implemented

a) yes

5) I would like to be able to affect the overall durability of an item

a) yes

I want resource quality alone to affect overall durability

b) no

I want experimentation & resource quality to affect overall durability

a) yes

I don't want the durability of new items to ever be lower than 1000

b) no

------------------------------------------------------------

Sre'dni Vashtar - Bria
sv Armoury -4976, 2712 Corellia

KnnOs

Wed Apr 07, 2004 2:13 pm

#25

1) I want socketing to be in our top 5

a) yes

2) I want socketing to be put back the way it was

a) yes

3) If reinstating the old system is not an option (the likely scenario)

I want resource quality alone to affect sockets

b) no

I want experimentation & resource quality to affect sockets

a) yes

I want to keep it random

b) no

4) I would like use-based clothing decay to be implemented

b) no

5) I would like to be able to affect the overall durability of an item

a) yes

I want resource quality alone to affect overall durability

b) no

I want experimentation & resource quality to affect overall durability

a) yes

I don't want the durability of new items to ever be lower than 1000

b) no

KittyKat and Dora: Tailoring and Salon
Proprietors: KittyKat and Dora'tilan --- Server: Ahazi --- Planet: Theed
City: Caserta---Coordinates: -579, 5559
*------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*
Specializing in custom orders, E-mail Dora't or KittyKat in-game for an appointment!
Image Design Available!

MayRee

Wed Apr 07, 2004 2:32 pm

#26

Thank you all for your patience and support during this process!

1) I want socketing to be in our top 5

a) yes

2) I want socketing to be put back the way it was

a) yes

3) If reinstating the old system is not an option (the likely scenario)

I want resource quality alone to affect sockets

a) yes

I want experimentation & resource quality to affect sockets

a) yes (preferred)

I want to keep it random

b) no

4) I would like use-based clothing decay to be implemented

a) yes

5) I would like to be able to affect the overall durability of an item

a) yes

I want resource quality alone to affect overall durability

a) yes

I want experimentation & resource quality to affect overall durability

a) yes (preferred)

MayRee Shen-Ku

Master Tailor Master Pistoler

Tailor Archive

Thread: Poll: Sockets, experimentation, decay