Smuggler Archive
Thread: Test center patch update concerning Feign Death
http://forums.station.sony.com/swg/board/message?board.id=jedi&message.id=723757&jump=true
Sorry, no edit as HTML option to make clicky...
riotcontrol wrote:
DRWolfe wrote:
The Jedi have noticed the patch notes as well...
Clicky!
Sorry, no edit as HTML option to make clicky...
/bow
riotcontrol wrote:
TC-Gorath
Version 0.113714
* Made incapacitation work if you are feigning death
So... what exactly do they mean by this? Wes? Caylin? Any ideas?
Optimistically?
The ability for players to attack a Feigned smuggler was a bug where the Incapacitation state was not in effect. NPCs never broke this as the act of Feigning ended their attack on you (not the combat state, just you selected as target.) Players could however choose to ignore this change and continue to attack the bugged incaped smuggler, yet still never DB (the one other part of FD working)
That's just my hope against hopes... Ideally this will lead to BH's and Jedi having their mission "complete" at incap, thus rendering the FD BH v Jedi grief and keeping this ours and ours alone.
Additionally, if FD is simply a "controlled incap" from now on, it would mean we are limited to 2 in 10 min- a fair price to pay in exchange for our intact HAMs, IMO.
Of course that wasn't even mentioned on a patch note, but we still don't know why!
Wonder if we'll find out about this one soon, or any time...
Thochkored wrote:/optimisticPerhpas they are making it to look like an incap, so when we get up we no longer are immediately argoed.That may be a bit to much to expect for them to do, just because.It is more than likely this is a fix to prevent the Jedi v. BH uses of Feign. If it means a Jedi can Feign, not lose XP and the BH still gets credit for the mission, or if a BH feigns he fails his mission, then this might be a good change.
Exploiting galore.
riotcontrol wrote:
Thochkored wrote:
/optimistic
Perhpas they are making it to look like an incap, so when we get up we no longer are immediately argoed.
That may be a bit to much to expect for them to do, just because.
It is more than likely this is a fix to prevent the Jedi v. BH uses of Feign. If it means a Jedi can Feign, not lose XP and the BH still gets credit for the mission, or if a BH feigns he fails his mission, then this might be a good change.
Exploiting galore.
Yeah you're right.
riotcontrol wrote:
Thochkored wrote:
/optimistic
Perhpas they are making it to look like an incap, so when we get up we no longer are immediately argoed.
That may be a bit to much to expect for them to do, just because.
It is more than likely this is a fix to prevent the Jedi v. BH uses of Feign. If it means a Jedi can Feign, not lose XP and the BH still gets credit for the mission, or if a BH feigns he fails his mission, then this might be a good change.
Exploiting galore.
Make it so the Jedi loses XP like he does when a BH deathblows him now, just let Feign Death prevent the additional cloning loss, just as if he gets rezzed now. No farming or exploiting there, at least not any more than you can already do with a fully-templated knight who no longer cares about XP loss.
riotcontrol wrote:
Thochkored wrote:
/optimistic
Perhpas they are making it to look like an incap, so when we get up we no longer are immediately argoed.
That may be a bit to much to expect for them to do, just because.
It is more than likely this is a fix to prevent the Jedi v. BH uses of Feign. If it means a Jedi can Feign, not lose XP and the BH still gets credit for the mission, or if a BH feigns he fails his mission, then this might be a good change.
Exploiting galore.
NickHeel wrote:
My Master Smuggler sense is tingling...I feel yet another swift kick to the nads coming my wayI hope I'm so wrong though.