Smuggler Archive

Thread: Dread Pirate Robert Vs. Han Solo

Spec-Ops
Sun Nov 14, 2004 2:41 pm
#14

i think Dread Pirate Robert.. cause he is that slick



DoltanReibisch
MasterSmuggler
CaptainoftheRogueEnforcer
Gorath
"DestroyallthatisEvil,soallthatisGoodmayflourish"
nerfherder321
Sun Nov 14, 2004 8:28 pm
#15

the pirate blows up, bcause solo used a detonator droid




Cheat Fetto
Dosi
Mon Nov 15, 2004 1:11 am
#16


JacobKell wrote:
Who the hell is dread pirate roberts?!
Am i not getting this because i am thick?(its possible lol) or because im english and lead a sheltered life?




Lol, sit down and watch some movies. Start with The Princess Bride.

Oh yea, I also believe that Dread pirate roberts would win.

Message Edited by Dosi on 11-14-2004 02:12 PM



==============================================
NDosi AtasiarN
Elder Master Smuggler, Seller of Spices and Imperial Faction
Eta-2 Actis Interceptor "Darkness Fell"
MySpace
==============================================
Bentu Tarlen, Master Shipwright. Vendors in Spacetown, Lok @ 444 -1100

EmpireEntrepeneur
Mon Nov 15, 2004 1:18 am
#17

Dread Roberts all the way!! Why?

Not because of their combatant skills, quick wit, or enlarged allies.

Roberts has True Love!!!



Nanaa Essex
.:: Bria::.
Master Smuggler

Novice Pistoleer (2002)
Novice TK (0011)
Freelance Pilot (1111)

Skelestoner
Mon Nov 15, 2004 1:46 am
#18

hehehe id have to say the dread pirate roberts. i agree with a bunch of the ideas already said, but he would also intimidate solo by raising his own blaster and saying "drop, your, BLASTER!"





N
Odimon
Master smuggler Novice BH Master Scoundrel
! creeping all over Lowca !

Evett
Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:25 am
#19

The rodents of unusual size kill both Solo and Roberts before either can again an advantage on the other.
Its a draw!

Evett
Dodece
Mon Nov 15, 2004 6:28 pm
#20

Bet you didnt know.


The original princess bride was a political commedy from the nineteenth century. With social commentary about monarchies and so forth.


The book was brought back by an author. Who had the story read to him as a child by his grandfather. Yes that part of the movie is telling you something. The boy who had it read to him as a child grew up to be an author. He looked up the book and found an old copy of it to give to his son as a present. The kid could not read it, because it was a wordy political diatribe from the nineteenth century with a very good fantasy story woven in. The author who had the book read to him as a child was only read this part of the book. The grandfather skipped the political stuff. If they did this to some of jules vernes stuff now I am sure more people would read them.


The author saw to the republishing of the book with the political part ripped out. The book then went on to be a very decent hit. Which was later made into a movie.


Scarey aint it. This book would have languished in obscurity for the rest of time. If that one authors grandfather had not read him a whittled down version as a child. By the way the book is even better then the movie. If you ever get a chance to read it by all means do.
Jaim_Darkstryder
Mon Nov 15, 2004 7:27 pm
#21


Dodece wrote:
Bet you didnt know.
The original princess bride was a political commedy from the nineteenth century. With social commentary about monarchies and so forth.
The book was brought back by an author. Who had the story read to him as a child by his grandfather. Yes that part of the movie is telling you something. The boy who had it read to him as a child grew up to be an author. He looked up the book and found an old copy of it to give to his son as a present. The kid could not read it, because it was a wordy political diatribe from the nineteenth century with a very good fantasy story woven in. The author who had the book read to him as a child was only read this part of the book. The grandfather skipped the political stuff. If they did this to some of jules vernes stuff now I am sure more people would read them.
The author saw to the republishing of the book with the political part ripped out. The book then went on to be a very decent hit. Which was later made into a movie.
Scarey aint it. This book would have languished in obscurity for the rest of time. If that one authors grandfather had not read him a whittled down version as a child. By the way the book is even better then the movie. If you ever get a chance to read it by all means do.





Um, I really think you need to re-read the book then.

The entire bits about the abridgement of the "original" author's work and most of the family references thrown in about William Goldman's family, are in fact more fiction. S. Morgenstern, the supposed original author, is completely fictitious. Also, William Goldman... the real author who writes himself into the book and claims to be simply writing an abridgement... had two daughters, not the "big fat whiny" son he writes about in the book, nor was his wife a psychiatrist. He has also written many screenplays for films, such as Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid and STephen King's Misery... in the 30th Anniversary Edition of the book he even recounts a "conversation" with Stephen King about King being chosen over him to do the abridgement of the second book... because King is in fact of Guilder descent and the Estate of S. Morgenstern (also supposedly from Guilder) wanted him to do it instead.

Just food for thought.


Now all of that said, having read the book as well as having seen the movie numerous times...

I would have to say that Roberts would win but not until facing Han with his blaster out and quipping, "I must say, the odds are somewhat in your favor when it comes to gunfighting"

Then after a long, dramatic fight, Roberts would have Han at his mercy and say, "I would as soon destroy a stained glass window as a master such as yourself... but, I cannot have you following me either...", and he would proceed to knock him unconscious with the hilt of his rapier.


Message Edited by Jaim_Darkstryder on 11-15-2004 09:29 PM



# I support people who don’t pirate the ribbon symbol and plaster all over irrelavent "causes" YARR, matey!
Dodece
Tue Nov 16, 2004 8:30 am
#22

By god that is really twisted. Though I will admit I read the book like ten years ago. So I might have missed some stuff, but its kind of twisted to make a bogus factual notation at the beginning of the book. God I hate this ghostwriteing, and other nonsense if its true. I will not lose any sleep over it one way or another. Just recanting what the preamble to the book said. Not being an investigative journalist here. Just saying what the book said.


Its still a good read.


lurdanta
Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:08 am
#23

Well, I'm kind of hesistant to answer this one since I just got chastised by a community adviser for making an inappropriate post to this forum, but I'd have to go with the Dread Pirate Robert.

Evett
Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:54 am
#24

Okay correct me if Im wrong but wasn't Christopher Walken cast at some point as Han Solo for Star Wars 4? If thats the case and we wanna go off the movie instead of the book this is how I see it:

Dread Pirate Roberts humiliates Han Solo played by Harrison Ford.Han Solo drops his blaster and gets his hand cut off as he reaches for it. Total blowout.

However, When Dread Roberts tries to whack Han Solo on the head played by Christopher Walken, Han Solo snatches the saber out of his hand and slits Dread Pirates throat with his own weapon and then laughs crazily.

Ok maybe I should have gotten more sleep.....
Isleh
Tue Nov 16, 2004 10:01 am
#25






Dodece wrote:

I hate to break it to you. It would be the dread pirate roberts. Both these guys have increadible. Luck and should have died long ago. Lets look at through the sicilians eyes.


The dread pirate roberts in increadibly intelligent. So he would have known to use the weapons of the time to even the battlefield. So even if the pirate could not procure a weapon legally he would procure it illegally by clubbing a storm trooper.


Han solo on the other hand is a criminal, and being a criminal he will not follow any rules of conduct. So the pirate must know this, and act accordingly.


Han Solo is not a true stand up figher he is a runner. Infact most of the time you can find him doing just that running from a fight. This suggests a higher risk of flight ratio.


The dread pirate robertts on the other hand is aggressive confrontational, and an expert stalker. These two match and cancel out.


Lastly the Dread pirate roberts has a greater combat potential not only does he possess good strength and stamina, but skill and foresight aswell.


This being said this would not be a fair fight. Infact it would be a fight decided by ambush. The result would be the pirate roberts standing in the millenium falcon with his sword in one hand and a blaster in the other. As Han comes in disenbowl and head shot. After all he is a pirate expert in close quarters combat, plus as a pirate he is a two handed weapon user.





Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.


Also, what an amusing mental image. Roberts, Inigo and Fezzik in an Endor shield generator onslaught.


Duckfat
Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:17 pm
#26

Dread Pirate Roberts could win just using his left hand and Solo wouldnt even know that he is not left handed.



Duckfat - The Duck of Death

Rebel Colonel - I don't really lead, others just like to follow
Wookiee Businessman - Killing is my business, and business is good
Master Pistoleer/Smuggler/TKA - Just in case some dumb imp patrol wants to scan my shiznit.
Duckpond Vendors - Silver City, Naboo (-1963 -3564)
Page 2 of 3