Rifleman Archive
Thread: Weapon Encumberance has to go
Page 3 of 3
Cack_Masta
Tue Jun 21, 2005 5:23 am
#27
Another thing you all seem to be missing, is that even if these T21 guns aren't heavy, they sure are akward to run with. They don't have them strapped to your back like the army guy had. You are all running around with them in your arms. Ith's the same concept to plywood. It may not weight alot, but it's very odd to carry it, since it's much longer in both aspecs of length and width.
Get over it.
Warmaker01
Wed Jun 22, 2005 5:40 am
#28
Cack_Masta wrote:Another thing you all seem to be missing, is that even if these T21 guns aren't heavy, they sure are akward to run with. They don't have them strapped to your back like the army guy had. You are all running around with them in your arms. Ith's the same concept to plywood. It may not weight alot, but it's very odd to carry it, since it's much longer in both aspecs of length and width.Get over it.
You have not operated or trained with a weapon in your hands, namely a Rifle. Weight is distrubuted to both hands/arms.
As for SWG Rifles and encumberances: What we have right now is as far as it should get. With all the talk of Nerfing Roots & Snares (which Rifleman need to safely "Kite" or maintain distance), Sniper Shot getting a +20 minimum range, with more Rifleman Nerfs coming, do you think Rifleman REALLY should be slowed down even more?
The only way I'd accept slower movement and these upcoming Nerfs is if they make Riflemen hit REALLY harder than it does now.
Message Edited by Warmaker01 on 06-22-2005 05:40 AM
"If they can be fooled, they can be killed."
Page 3 of 3