Ranger Archive
Thread: One Sentence solution for Rangers?
Message Edited by Calculus_Entropy on 07-16-2004 02:46 PM
all critters...including Human, zabrak, twi'lek and definately Bothan, Wookies, Trandoshan, Mon Calamari and Rodian (if they are not critters I don't know what is)
Calculus_Entropy wrote:
How about:
Rangers need increased damage to critters andincreased defensesagainst critters to be more effictive creature killers than your average joe.
Just a suggestion...
Calculus_Entropy wrote:
How about:
Rangers need increased damage to critters andincreased defensesagainst critters to be more effictive creature killers than your average joe.
Just a suggestion...
Rangercombat needsincreased damage & defencevs non-sentientcreatures to be a more effictive creature hunter/harvester then a master combat stacker with just novice scout.
Come on Rangers,lets all get involved.Here is an opportunity to get us all heard as a single voice, lets get this perfect and start posting! 
Phenix1050 wrote:
Rangersdesire to become more than simply "super-scouts"and, as such, we are looking to have increased functionality in both the PvP and PvE arenas; they desire to have Ranger-specific weapons, specials, and are particularly interested in having increased defence and offence against creatures while notbeing delegated to an entirelyPvE role.
Very nicely done.
Yep: said my peace. The "Boycott JTL till they do CB" crowd has already hijacked the thread, however.
Bartholomew_Roberts wrote:
Everyone should go post here. I read through the entire thing and didn't see any familiar names. I'm sure that Rangers I haven't met yet have posted. Everyone go post there ASAP!
http://forums.station.sony.com/swg/board/message?board.id=in_concept&message.id=13442
Fred_Skinner wrote:
Yep: said my peace. The "Boycott JTL till they do CB" crowd has already hijacked the thread, however.
Bartholomew_Roberts wrote:
Everyone should go post here. I read through the entire thing and didn't see any familiar names. I'm sure that Rangers I haven't met yet have posted. Everyone go post there ASAP!
http://forums.station.sony.com/swg/board/message?board.id=in_concept&message.id=13442
Are they trying to get forum ranger xp?
On a more serious note my post there was of the "fix everything that's been broken in the non jedi professions before you add any more code" persuasion. It was one sentence, and had to do with combat.
Phenix1050 wrote:
Rangersdesire to become more than simply "super-scouts" and, as such, we are looking to have increased functionality in both the PvP and PvE arenas; they desire to have Ranger-specific weapons, specials, and are particularly interested in having increased defence and offence against creatures while notbeing delegated to an entirelyPvE role.
Wouldn't this require a revamp and not a "quick fix"? Seems to me we need to stick tothings already in the game such as to-hit mods and toughness mods. Increasing our to-hit, damage and defencewould take some tweaking to existing mods in the game, creature to-hit, unarmed damage and unarmed toughness to name a few. Seems like this would take much less code and dev time.
On another note, thank you for joining in; I like the the rest of it a lot
NerfBurger wrote:
Calculus_Entropy wrote:
How about:
Rangers need increased damage to critters andincreased defensesagainst critters to be more effictive creature killers than your average joe.
Just a suggestion...
Rangercombat needsincreased damage & defencevs non-sentientcreatures to be a more effictive creature hunter/harvester then a master combat stacker with just novice scout.
Come on Rangers,lets all get involved.Here is an opportunity to get us all heard as a single voice, lets get this perfect and start posting!
NerfBurger wrote:
In response to TH's thread asking for "One Sentence" solutions for current combat problems I figured we could come up with a unified statement and each and everyone of us post it in the thread. I've read through 18 pages so far and no Rangers have spoke up yet. So, how can we condense ourideas into one easy to read and well worded sentence, and what does it need to cover?
- Creature to-hit mod
- Creature damage mod
- Creature toughness
Example:
"Rangers would like to see their combat effeciency vs. creature increased with creature-cetric skill mods and defenses so a Master Ranger/Master Elite profession is a more effective hunter then a Novice Scout/Master Combat Stacker"
Ranger Terrain negotiation needs to be for running/walking, NOT crawling.