Ranger Archive

Thread: Alternative to SL/Ranger merge Merge Ranger & Scout instead

Kinshi
Wed Jun 15, 2005 1:49 pm
#1

Wellhere are a cpl of other,viable alternative to a Ranger/SL merge...tho I think Rangers will like it even less... (but havent you figured out yet that SOEmotivations are not based in whatYOU like?)


Delete the Ranger profession and move all its abilities to Master Scout and the Scout trees (frankly there not much there worth the SP and it would not be imbalancing to move them down to Scout since the 2 professions are essentially the same.)


Proposal:



  1. Redistribute the skill mods in Ranger across the matching boxes in Scout. Scale the skill mods so the biggest overall mods by far come with the Master Scout box.

  2. Move Mask Scent to Novice anddistribute thevarious types of Camo kits over that branch.

  3. Eliminate the current Scout camps and replace them with the Ranger camps (put HTFB at Master Scout)

  4. Move the Ranger traps down into Scout (like we use most of the Ranger lvl traps anyway)

  5. Move Tracking down into Scout as well

  6. Move Harvest bonus down to Master Scout

This propsal realizes the reality that all a Ranger is, is actually a Scout with bigger skill mods, and can make a cpl extra things. Ranger and Scout are a 1:1 mapping and Ranger hold very little that Scout does not.


In fact all you need currently is Scout 3000 and you can harvest, evade creatures, trap,and camp


Go back and look at the SOE diagram of all the combat roles in the game, note how Ranger isnt on that chart. Ranger isnt going to be on that chart.


Alternative to the Alternative Proposal:


SOE can take the cheap way out like they did with Image Designer and simply reduce the SP cost of the profession then forget about it forever, or go one step further like they did with Politician, remove the SP cost all together,


Maybe make the Ranger boxes cost nothing but you have to have Master Scout to get to them.


---


Anyway..both of these are more likley viable as a final solution than a revamp that gives us a role in all aspects of SWG. Anyway ya look at it, Ranger in SWG is a design failure, and given the Rangers themselves have no singular vision of what a Ranger is, prolly better to Merge Scout& Ranger again because they are the same darn thing in function.


At least this way you could get Scout and the minmal Ranger skills and still get 2 combat Professions (CL80), enough to play what ever kind of 'Ranger' you want. Far, Far better than wasting SP on skills few care about or use, and also would be easy for SOE to integrate and code into the game architecture..and would be far less of a culture clash than a SL/Ranger merge.


Id rather see Ranger made into Scout and deleted than have this 'undead' state we have now.




Phenix1050
Wed Jun 15, 2005 1:57 pm
#2

Seriously...enough. People don't want Ranger gone. They want a viable profession that's unique and fun to play. not a novice profession that's overpowered. If people wanted to be uber scouts, they'd be scouts. Rangers are meant to be so much more. and while you see to have a depressing lack of patience, I'm much more willing to sit here and wait for a revamp that helps us rather than see the profession I love get deleted because some people can't wait it out.



PHE'NIX ANTARUS
BOTHAN ELDER RANGER
BEST LOOKINGSPY EVER--FOUNDER OF SATGWNIWNU
BURNING H*TPANTS SINCE 2003


This is horrible! I return to find my new title on the forum is "Jedi". What's up with that? If they wanted to confer that I'm rare and learned, they'd make my title RANGER. and then make it camo colored.
Ronaj
Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:01 pm
#3






Phenix1050 wrote:

Seriously...enough. People don't want Ranger gone. They want a viable profession that's unique and fun to play. not a novice profession that's overpowered. If people wanted to be uber scouts, they'd be scouts. Rangers are meant to be so much more. and while you see to have a depressing lack of patience, I'm much more willing to sit here and wait for a revamp that helps us rather than see the profession I love get deleted because some people can't wait it out.






I agree completely with the smelly bothan.



IGN Ronaj Anatil - Master Ranger

Contract Miner For Hire

9,080,937 units mined under contract since CU and counting


Painting Vendor 3314, -867 Commerce City, Lok

Temujin23
Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:09 pm
#4


So what you're proposing, essentially, is to reduce Ranger from an elite to a novice profession. I like this idea even less than the other one, for these reasons:


1. As a novice profession, scout would be horribly overpowered.


2. Most of like the uniqueness of Ranger, despite its shortcomings. We've made compromises before, I'm sure we will continue to do so, but this one is too big.


3. Simply put, we shouldn't have to be demoted from an elite profession in order to have a viable template.


and most importantly,


4. Even this drastic change would be worthless WITHOUT AN ACTUAL FIX. Moving all Ranger skills into scout isn't going to make them work any better. Traps won't magically start working if Ranger gets deleted. Camps won't suddenly have a purpose. Rescue won't have an epiphany and decide to function without the nonexistent /peace command. Camo won't stop aggroing grey cons when it breaks. None of this will happen without the devs taking the time to fix these problems. And if they ever do, why bother merging us with anyone?


I too would like to see something happen for us. Like many of you, I'm bloody well fed up with the complete lack of attention and respect that we're given. But I don't think this is the answer.


al-djinn'i


Master Ranger





Wake up! Time to die.
Calculus_Entropy
Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:14 pm
#5

My problem with this suggestion is that it (obviously) does nothing to help the Ranger Prof. As Phen said, no one wants Ranger gone, we want to be useful. Our goal here is to improve the Ranger profession, not give the devs quick solutions to our problems, regardless of how it affects us (which seems to be your mantra). Quick soultions are certainly preferable, but 'quick' is in the eye of the beholder.



Calculus Entropy
Ranger Blue Glowie Emeritus
Garindan used /areatrack to find Han.
Modru
Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:15 pm
#6


Sorry Bro,


I like being a Master Ranger even though its nerfed big time, I might respec my other profession, but never my Master Ranger. I will wait till it gets fixed, and as all us Rangers know, we have alot of patience.



Modru--Elder Ranger/Bio-Engineer/Rifleman/Pistoleer
Vidron--Elder Tera Kasi/Swordsman/Doc

HAVOC
Vendor at (917,1083) Naboo

Kinshi
Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:19 pm
#7






Phenix1050 wrote:

Seriously...enough. People don't want Ranger gone. They want a viable profession that's unique and fun to play. not a novice profession that's overpowered. If people wanted to be uber scouts, they'd be scouts. Rangers are meant to be so much more. and while you see to have a depressing lack of patience, I'm much more willing to sit here and wait for a revamp that helps us rather than see the profession I love get deleted because some people can't wait it out.






2 years man!!! That is how long Ranger has been declining, You are betting on a fantasy, I am basing the argument on the reality. Waiting 2 plus years is not being paitent, its called wasting time and effort and for what, to have the chance to brag 2 years later and say "Itold you it would come?" Tell me what makes you think a revamp will come next year let alone this year, other than just wishing it were true? You would have us mired where we are indefintely, waiting?


Hasnt the way SOE has handled the same types of problems with other professions been any indication to you what is likley to happen here? Go review the last 2 years of publishes and tell me what you see.


Im beyond caring whatRanger were meant to be in the orginal design because I realize that doesnt count for squat now. You think I like it that Ranger has gotten to where it is? Hell no but I think is short sighted and unproductive to keep plugging away at an effort that has continued to produce nothing.


You can play the role of Don Quixote if you like but Im going to view our situation objectively, not based on what I wish were true.


Sitting and waiting for things to happen to usis NOT a Ranger virtue...adapting, overcoming, and improvising is. We sit and wait, we are guaranteed to die as a viable profession. We change, we adapt into something else, we survive.

Kinshi
Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:37 pm
#8






Calculus_Entropy wrote:
My problem with this suggestion is that it (obviously) does nothing to help the Ranger Prof. As Phen said, no one wants Ranger gone, we want to be useful. Our goal here is to improve the Ranger profession, not give the devs quick solutions to our problems, regardless of how it affects us (which seems to be your mantra). Quick soultions are certainly preferable, but 'quick' is in the eye of the beholder.




Then offer something else besides the miserably failed concept of the 'revamp'. Something that has a shot of working while there are still enough people left in the game to care about being a Ranger or care about the skillset.


And I find the idea posted that Ranger & Scout merged would be "overpowering" hahaha thats funny in a sad sort of way because if the skills were so great then everyone would want them right? Fact is few outside the Ranger profession give a damn about Ranger or even Scout skills


In fact there are onlyfourthings a Ranger can do that a Scout cannot


1. /rescue (a nice, who cares? ability)


2. /conceal (another who cares now since anyone can apply a camo kit)


3. /areatrack - the only skill a Ranger has that others might want (anyone up for a Bladeback Boar hunt for the millionth time?)


4. Make camo - did you become a Ranger to be a crafter to supply everyone else? Didnt think so.


Everything else is just skill mods and even those dont matter considering a Scout simply can match our numbers by hunting longer. Just ONE skill that a Ranger has that is desirable by other professions.


Other profs dont care about the HTFB or camps in general, they dont care about our trapping (which is almost totally broken, and now we face nerf calls to the p-dart)


Ranger has no role designated in the post-CU world. Ranger is not included in the overall design of the CU, and the CU was a months long development effort. You really think SOE is going to go through that again just to make Rangers happy? Beause that is what it would take to balance Ranger as a full fleged combat proession against all the others if were to be revamped correctly. You really think that is likely? Is it any wonder they dont know what to do with us?


Hell Rangers hardly seem to know what they want done with Rangers, as we cant seem to come up with anything besides hoping for a miracle.



You dont like these options, well neither do I, so give me something better than what we have now.







Message Edited by Kinshi on 06-15-2005 02:40 AM

Calculus_Entropy
Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:39 pm
#9

Yeah...I am through with you. You don't want to hear it, and I am tired of saying it...

Message Edited by Calculus_Entropy on 06-15-2005 04:18 PM



Calculus Entropy
Ranger Blue Glowie Emeritus
Garindan used /areatrack to find Han.
JBMat
Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:42 pm
#10


We are nerfed?


Damn, don't be telling the Krayts that.


7 in a row before I had to bio break. Stupid loot drops suck tho.


JB
Ronaj
Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:55 pm
#11

No offense meant but you don't like the class, you don't like the wait, you've dropped it going by your sig, for some reason you're still in the Antarian Rangers and you don't even like your OWN options??? Why even bother coming back and posting ideas? All your doing is just pissing yourself off more and trying to take it out on the ones that are sticking with it.



IGN Ronaj Anatil - Master Ranger

Contract Miner For Hire

9,080,937 units mined under contract since CU and counting


Painting Vendor 3314, -867 Commerce City, Lok

Phenix1050
Wed Jun 15, 2005 3:10 pm
#12






Kinshi wrote:



Sitting and waiting for things to happen to usis NOT a Ranger virtue...adapting, overcoming, and improvising is. We sit and wait, we are guaranteed to die as a viable profession. We change, we adapt into something else, we survive.






Lol. I love that phrase. "Guarantee to die as a viable profession." How do you possibly type that with a straight face, considering that you just suggested that our profession be killed outright? Under your proposal, Ranger would be dead as a profession, not just as a viable one. Chossing between a totally dead profession and one that functions 1/2 the time, the way Ranger does now, I'm gonna have to say that I'll keep what we have now. Thanks.


I think I'm done with you. You repeat the same idea ad nauseum-- that change is better than waiting. If you came up with a single idea that didn't destroy our profession in the process, I might agree with you. But as it is, all your arguments boil down to the same incorrect assumption and you arrive at conclusions that are farther and farther away from reality.


Hate to say it, but the idea that people might actually support (in large numbers) the idea of killing Ranger and putting it into scouts means that you've already gove down the road of Mr. Quixote. You're dreaming man.



PHE'NIX ANTARUS
BOTHAN ELDER RANGER
BEST LOOKINGSPY EVER--FOUNDER OF SATGWNIWNU
BURNING H*TPANTS SINCE 2003


This is horrible! I return to find my new title on the forum is "Jedi". What's up with that? If they wanted to confer that I'm rare and learned, they'd make my title RANGER. and then make it camo colored.
BioEngine
Wed Jun 15, 2005 3:24 pm
#13






Phenix1050 wrote:





Kinshi wrote:



Sitting and waiting for things to happen to usis NOT a Ranger virtue...adapting, overcoming, and improvising is. We sit and wait, we are guaranteed to die as a viable profession. We change, we adapt into something else, we survive.






Lol. I love that phrase. "Guarantee to die as a viable profession." How do you possibly type that with a straight face, considering that you just suggested that our profession be killed outright? Under your proposal, Ranger would be dead as a profession, not just as a viable one. Chossing between a totally dead profession and one that functions 1/2 the time, the way Ranger does now, I'm gonna have to say that I'll keep what we have now. Thanks.


I think I'm done with you. You repeat the same idea ad nauseum-- that change is better than waiting. If you came up with a single idea that didn't destroy our profession in the process, I might agree with you. But as it is, all your arguments boil down to the same incorrect assumption and you arrive at conclusions that are farther and farther away from reality.


Hate to say it, but the idea that people might actually support (in large numbers) the idea of killing Ranger and putting it into scouts means that you've already gove down the road of Mr. Quixote. You're dreaming man.





Q


F


E





Account active 'till November 10th, contact me on forum name:
Stamina
Page 1 of 3
Previous Next