Ranger Archive
Thread: Corr Summit Summary
Fred_Skinner wrote:
All that cool "excitement" stuff is fine for things like Gorax, Krayt, GDK, et al but when the doc wants Herbi from Pikets and it's taking me one hour per lair I WILL NOT be happy.
I totally agree, again.
Serraphin wrote:
Calc,
To rehash from your summary you are absolutely right! They do not want unhappy customers but Ranger = very few customers which = not much revenue loss.
Until all the professions who rely on us to supply for their crafting supplies notice we've gone, then there's even more people not happy. Then after they quit, there's all theircustomers who'll not be happy.
Damn, we rangers ARE undervalued aren't we.
If Rangers constituted the bulk of hunters for profit that would be true. Unfortunately, most of the hunting is accomplished by template stackers with a droid and sometimes just novice. I think we can agree that it should be the Rangers and especially Master Rangers that outshine anyone but that is just not the case. Rangers could leave today and crafters would still get there hides. Crafters have adjusted there prices for the shortage of rangers long ago. For example, on my server recent spawns of Lok Wooly = 100cpu, Talus avian 175cpu, Naboo wooly=50, in the past prices have been over 200cpu. Very few rangers delivering but massive amounts of novice hunters with combat templates. Many armorsmiths had achieved there quotos in just days. Are Rangers undervalued? The answer is Yes. But SOE has made it so, not this forum or its members.
DaveG wrote:
Serraphin wrote:
Calc,
To rehash from your summary you are absolutely right! They do not want unhappy customers but Ranger = very few customers which = not much revenue loss.
Until all the professions who rely on us to supply for their crafting supplies notice we've gone, then there's even more people not happy. Then after they quit, there's all theircustomers who'll not be happy.
Damn, we rangers ARE undervalued aren't we.
Message Edited by Serraphin on 08-31-2004 05:52 PM
Message Edited by Lorell on 09-01-2004 04:42 PM
Rooks wrote:
Um, Calc,
Was mounted Combat brought up at all?
We have all talked about it for months and i was really hoping it would get some loving in the CB, especially for the Rangers.
Also, I agree with others, isn't traps combat related?
also curious about that...
maybe i should add "nerfboy hats" to the list of needed tailor schematics... the nerf herders need good headwear...
Rooks wrote:
Um, Calc,
Was mounted Combat brought up at all?
We have all talked about it for months and i was really hoping it would get some loving in the CB, especially for the Rangers.
Also, I agree with others, isn't traps combat related?
No, it wasn't, but I will start a thread on the Corr Forum in a bit.
Serraphin wrote:
Calc,
To rehash from your summary you are absolutely right! They do not want unhappy customers but Ranger = very few customers which = not much revenue loss.
I can't disagree with that, BUT they are not knowingly going to alienate any part of their constituency.