Ranger Archive
Thread: Could Calculus be Thunderheart???
Serraphin wrote:
I am sorry Darth but the correspondants just can't assist their communities they areonly "babysitters"
Serraphin wrote:
Serraphin wrote:
I am sorry Darth but the correspondants just can't assist their communities they are only "babysitters"
Wow, lets spread discontent to the one who represent us. I'm sure they will listen to you posts now.
Okay, enough is enough. Obviously from all the one-star posts, not "everyone" agrees with you. And this is not typically a "one-star" community. So I challenge everyone else to just ignore his rants. Adding fuel to a fire never helps put it out.
Seraphin, I am not about to go "searching" for constructive posts from you. From what I've seen in the last page or so of posts, most of yours have been negative. So that is my opinion of you because you have given me (or anyone else here it seems) little reason to view you in any other way. You say Ranger is broken? Obviously not bad since more than a handful of people disagree with you. But, back up your reasons in a constructive way. Trust me, I'll debate your points all day, or agree if you demonstrate to me that you have a valid reason for your beliefs. Those that know me know I make neither friends nor enemies. How one chooses to view me is one's own choice. But I do take the side of who I feel is "right" in a matter. And right now, from my own past experiences with the devs and their stance on ranters, I feel constructiveness is a far better way to go than pessimism. Because we can all come up with a list of reasons why Ranger "sucks". But what will it get us?
Puck_Starfire wrote:
Okay, enough is enough. Obviously from all the one-star posts, not "everyone" agrees with you. And this is not typically a "one-star" community. So I challenge everyone else to just ignore his rants. Adding fuel to a fire never helps put it out.
Seraphin, I am not about to go "searching" for constructive posts from you. From what I've seen in the last page or so of posts, most of yours have been negative. So that is my opinion of you because you have given me (or anyone else here it seems) little reason to view you in any other way. You say Ranger is broken? Obviously not bad since more than a handful of people disagree with you. But, back up your reasons in a constructive way. Trust me, I'll debate your points all day, or agree if you demonstrate to me that you have a valid reason for your beliefs. Those that know me know I make neither friends nor enemies. How one chooses to view me is one's own choice. But I do take the side of who I feel is "right" in a matter. And right now, from my own past experiences with the devs and their stance on ranters, I feel constructiveness is a far better way to go than pessimism. Because we can all come up with a list of reasons why Ranger "sucks". But what will it get us?
Call it what you will we can agree to disagree. But I will offer that the Outdoorsman proposal is dead. Million Monkeys--dead. And even though I am sure Calculus is a hard working Correspondant he serves only as a wall, no a shield between the community and the devs. I further offer that the state of the profession is the following:
Mask Scent--broken/bugged
Camo--broken/bugged
Camping--broken/bugged, some say useless "eyecandy"
Foraging--Useless except for fish bait
Areatrack--broken/bugged
Creature harvesting-- A droids work now
Trapping--broken/bugged
Terrain --Well I guess one thing works
That is the state of the profession, it has been nearly one year.
THE ABOVE IS AN EXCERPT FROM ONE OF MY POSTS IN THE STATE OF THE PROFESSION