Ranger Archive
Thread: Correspondent Summit regarding the CB
Page 3 of 3
Fodder650
Mon Jul 19, 2004 7:05 am
#27
Now Calc people find this very important. Do you get a badge at the correspondent meeting?
"I went to the corresponded meeting and all I got was this stupid badge" - t'shirts?
"You have earned 'Badge of correspondent hopeful optimism'"
or
"You have earned 'Badger of free food and lodging from SOE'"
Calculus_Entropy
Mon Jul 19, 2004 7:46 am
#28
MrSclod wrote:
Calculus_Entropy wrote:
I am surprised that no one picked up on this when TH subtlely mentioned this on the CB delay thread...
Great news Calc, but I don't remember seeing anything about having a face to face meeting? It's nice to hear they are actually taking some initiative based on the revolt of the combat delay..sure hope they through us a bone before the time it takes to implement what all of you corrospondents will be discussing though.
A great step in the right direction in my opinion ..but this is going off the record of......
I missed it myself the first time (even though I knew we were going to meet)...
Fodder650
Mon Jul 19, 2004 7:52 am
#29
Yeah because badgers full of free food could be painful. I could go edit it. But it wouldnt fix the one you quoted. And itsjust funnier this way.
starkmd
Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:24 am
#30
Calc,
Here's a good question for the Summit:
<semi rant>
"How many developers will be dedicated to SWG (planet-based) new development. How many dedicated to Patching SWG (planet-based)?
How many Developers will be dedicated to space expansion?
How many Developers will be dedicated to quests?
I pay $15 a month... why isn't there 1 developer dedicated per profession?
...why not per quest?
...why not per planet?
...why, why, why?
What makes me believe that developers will not continue working on expansion after initial release due to inevitable bugs?"
<rant>
How's that help me? Maybe I (for one) will not purchase space expansion.... My $15 per month is being spent on something that has no bearing on me. Don't they realize this is rediculously poor business decision?
</rant></semi rant>
sorry... how un-Ranger-like of me...... but it's still a good question.
Here's a good question for the Summit:
<semi rant>
"How many developers will be dedicated to SWG (planet-based) new development. How many dedicated to Patching SWG (planet-based)?
How many Developers will be dedicated to space expansion?
How many Developers will be dedicated to quests?
I pay $15 a month... why isn't there 1 developer dedicated per profession?
...why not per quest?
...why not per planet?
...why, why, why?
What makes me believe that developers will not continue working on expansion after initial release due to inevitable bugs?"
<rant>
How's that help me? Maybe I (for one) will not purchase space expansion.... My $15 per month is being spent on something that has no bearing on me. Don't they realize this is rediculously poor business decision?
</rant></semi rant>
sorry... how un-Ranger-like of me...... but it's still a good question.
Calculus_Entropy
Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:33 am
#31
Starkmd...I moved your questions to the Corr Summit - Questions thread 
.
.
starkmd
Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:02 am
#32
Calc: You're always on top of things.... that's why we love you. 
Squidwalker
Mon Jul 19, 2004 4:54 pm
#33
An addition to my first post in here about the traps. Wanted to add a reply instead of edit so it didn't get missed.
In ranger, with additinal traps, we should have the abiity to put "every" state in the game via traps, on creatures.
This may seem powerful, but when you consider how many combat professions get most if not all of the states in their attacks. And the fact that maybe the Ranger isn't taking a combat profession, and it's balanced out by the fact that we have to thow a trap that is a slow animated action, not like firing a special. You can only load one trap in a droid, and unless CH can only have one Droid out. Thus the other traps to get the other startes need to be thrown by the ranger. The current 2 ranger traps already applly some states, but we need, through a few traps, to be able to apply all of them.
Page 3 of 3