Ranger Archive

---

Tarnak_Archvold wrote:

---

Maxanto wrote:

there is a huge difference... no scouting branches will assist with combat...none! Carbines will. We are a ranged combat professions regardless of who thinks we should not be... We will not get rifles (though I hope i am wrong cause that would rock!) and I doubt pistols since smugglers already ate that up, same with ranged support for BH...

I doubt this is gonna change.

---

We do NOT need Speed modifiers to get an increased damage potent ional. And frankly if the choice is between allowing Melee ranger to have at least a little room to manoeuvre with is going to cost range rangers (and carbineer rangers in patikuler) a little extra that is still for the better of the profession.

Personally I am a Carbineer, so I am not arguing out of self interest here. I had planed to pick up some medic and BH skills on the side and a Carbineer 4 and Exploration 4 would as sutch be free for me.
But We have already had one split with the master of hunting rangers, to add another with the melee rangers, is totally unnecessary.

More over Carbineer is a combat style more then it is a weapon. The different combat profession offer combat styles, different ways to fight. Moreover, favouring carbineer over other styles is just unfair. Why should troughs that enjoy a particular style of combat have an easier time as a Ranger then others?

---

We can continue to preach over the poor melee/ranger's all day long and it will never change what is. For me I could care less... Atiro will still be more of a PVE toon than PVP as I will be keeping master scout. So would I personally prefer just the 2 branches in scout? Heck yea! IS that gonna happen? No.

So bend like a reed in the wind or snap and die...