Ranger Archive
Thread: Hostile Thune mothers = unharvestable?
JBMat
Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:20 am
#14
Fodder, it's most of the handacks that are unharvestable, at least in my experience. I think only one type is, the lower ones.
Gorax are like NPCs, but the reputed underlings, the Gurks are creatures, with the Kings being harvestable/lootable.
Just adds to the oddness of the game.
JB
remember, Pickets have no bones
Fodder650
Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:20 pm
#15
JBMat,
Quenkers dont have bones either nor do Thunes. I fiqure at best they are filled with giant air bladders. Yeah thats it its air bladders or cartidge that explodes on dying. I used to have a list of creatures that were missing bone but anymore I just stopped caring.
And i think it was half of the Hanadaks that were harvestable and half that werent. I think in the Hanadak case its to close to humanoid? And in the case of our Thune issue its the word "mother" and the game doesnt want us to go out and constantly kill things with mother in their titles.
Im sure this will be addressed during the Ranger revamp.... (hhehehehe i kill me)
agent156
Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:47 pm
#16
Better not fix these things before the Fishing Upgrade! We need those dev resources.
Cryos_Merovingian
Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:55 pm
#17
agent156 wrote:
Better not fix these things before the Fishing Upgrade! We need those dev resources.
agent156
Sat Mar 12, 2005 6:19 pm
#18
Ya don't yall get to used to Fishing Buffed and Comped, the FU cometh! And every thing will change!
Jolandir
Sat Mar 12, 2005 8:07 pm
#19
Thune Mothers have never been harvestable even though they should be.
Jolandir
seaware
Sun Mar 13, 2005 2:05 pm
#20
Fodder650 wrote:JBMat,Quenkers dont have bones either nor do Thunes. I fiqure at best they are filled with giant air bladders. Yeah thats it its air bladders or cartidge that explodes on dying. I used to have a list of creatures that were missing bone but anymore I just stopped caring.
Pikets as well, no idea how those guys stand so tall with no bone structure
Combat_Medic_to_be
Mon Mar 14, 2005 12:45 pm
#21
Roll on the FU! hehe.
I've just learned to acept the fact that very little in this game makes sense Only reason I can think for some creatures not having bones is if they have an exoskeleton and for somereason we cannot remove this bone structure from the animal intact enough to get any amount of units...
I've just learned to acept the fact that very little in this game makes sense
Only reason I can think for some creatures not having bones is if they have an exoskeleton and for somereason we cannot remove this bone structure from the animal intact enough to get any amount of units...
agent156
Tue Mar 15, 2005 1:00 am
#22
Do not go down the path of the exoskeleton explanation. You'll just end up with even more mental dissonance.
Ickpon
Tue Mar 15, 2005 1:10 am
#23
Combat_Medic_to_be wrote:
I've just learned to acept the fact that very little in this game makes sense
I couldn't agree more. I found myself thinking the same thing, but then decided none of it was rational.
As far as the original topic I have run into the same thing.
The "Ick"....
Rancorrider4
Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:34 pm
#24
Glad someone else mentioned the Hanadak issue, to go with the Hostile Thune Mother's. This has been like this for as long as I can remember and I've been playing since beta. Ack.
JBMat wrote:
Fodder, it's most of the handacks that are unharvestable, at least in my experience. I think only one type is, the lower ones.
Gorax are like NPCs, but the reputed underlings, the Gurks are creatures, with the Kings being harvestable/lootable.
Just adds to the oddness of the game.
JB
remember, Pickets have no bones
Creaturetaimer
Thu May 19, 2005 8:56 pm
#26
it is true.............. they have been bugged for awhile.