Pistoleer Archive
Thread: WE ARE GETTING DUEL PISTOLS!!!!
Page 5 of 5
KaernLegorah
Sun Mar 21, 2004 12:55 pm
#53
Confusion12345 wrote:
KaernLegorah wrote:
Confusion12345 wrote:
Uh....you have it backwards....
The people bugging you are right. It's "RIDICULOUS", not "rediculous".
Haha that's what I get for typing in a rush, I end up saying what I want backwards. People constantly spell it "rediculous," which is wrong.... and annoyingThere, that's what I meant to say the first time
KaernLegorah, no disrespect but....you're not all that bright are you? Go back and compare the post where I corrected you with your origional....
1. If you begin a statement with "no disrespect" then don't bother finishing what you want to say because your comment can only be disrespectful. Putting "no disrespect" is just how people make themselves feel better when they're going to insult somebody.
2. You purposely misquoted me in order to make me look stupid.
3. Why would I read your post, which quoted my post, assume that you had altered the quote and so compare it to my original post? Simply, I wouldn't. In fact, nobody would unless they wanted to check the context in which they said something, but since you quoted nearly my entire post that wasn't really an issue. There was no reason for me to read your post then think to myself "I bet this guy altered my post in order to mess with me, perhaps I shall compare it word by word to my actual post."
4. It's spelled "original," not "origional."
Confusion12345
Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:33 am
#54
KaernLegorah wrote:
Confusion12345 wrote:
KaernLegorah wrote:
Confusion12345 wrote:
Uh....you have it backwards....
The people bugging you are right. It's "RIDICULOUS", not "rediculous".
Haha that's what I get for typing in a rush, I end up saying what I want backwards. People constantly spell it "rediculous," which is wrong.... and annoying
KaernLegorah, no disrespect but....you're not all that bright are you? Go back and compare the post where I corrected you with your origional....
1. If you begin a statement with "no disrespect" then don't bother finishing what you want to say because your comment can only be disrespectful. Putting "no disrespect" is just how people make themselves feel better when they're going to insult somebody.
2. You purposely misquoted me in order to make me look stupid.
3. Why would I read your post, which quoted my post, assume that you had altered the quote and so compare it to my original post? Simply, I wouldn't. In fact, nobody would unless they wanted to check the context in which they said something, but since you quoted nearly my entire post that wasn't really an issue. There was no reason for me to read your post then think to myself "I bet this guy altered my post in order to mess with me, perhaps I shall compare it word by word to my actual post."
4. It's spelled "original," not "origional."
Uh....THAT WAS A TEST!
Congratulations, you uh....passed
HabeasCorpus
Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:36 am
#55
oh, the chiss bartender used the word "jedis" in JK2 when taking to Kyle Katarrn. He pluralized every noun that had a singular and plural form that was the same, as well as some that weren't. anytime I hear someone say Jedis, I think of him when he was begging for his life ("please noble jedis, not in the faces!" heh, I always killed the blue **edit**).
I hate always saying "look, this person did it in the movies, so this class should be able too!" Jango Fett did dual wield... that was probably done that way by Lucas because The Matrix had extensive dual wield gunplay and he felt that to captivate audiences more with that battle he needed to do the same. Episode two is the first time you see a Jedi dual wield either. If you are going to make the case that Jango Fett dual wield as a BH, I'd say, look what he dual wielded. Pistols. so, give pistoleers the ability to dual wield.
I also hate it when people say, " you shouldn't be able to dual wield in the game 'cos it's really hard to do in real life". this isn't real life, and those rules don't apply. I think any onehand weapon in this game could be dual wielded. that would exclude Carbineeers and Rifleman and Swordsman and Pikeman.
NaKitNa
Sat Apr 17, 2004 1:51 pm
#56
Jango was not a Bounty Hunter he was a mandalorian.. a mercenary...soldier. He didnt learn his pistol skills in a bounty hunting class. Collecting bounties was how he decided to ply his skills. The fact that Bounty Hunter is a class and not a faction (to keep them in the gray as usual) is a mistake, but oh well. So Jango would have been closer to a Pistoleer than a "bounty hunter".
SpaceGoat31
Sat Apr 17, 2004 4:41 pm
#57
Well you heard wrong. If they're giving it to fencers they're giving it to the ranged equivelent too.
djswift2k
Sat Apr 17, 2004 6:06 pm
#58
i thikn you all heard wrong, because all you heard were player-made rumors. tehe devs have NOT as of yet made any specific references to what will ghet dual wield. EArlier on, i think it was july, they first expressed in teh idea of a dual wield ability for pistoleers, in teh same update in which they referenced the acknowledgemeant of a "twirly move flourish". This was in text on thsese boards, i believe in late augest. They stated that they expressed interest, but did not ever say specificalyl anything since otehr than this new irc log. Stop the rumors, stop the arguing, and let it be and wait. I'd personally rather have the redundant and nonworking specials be fixed first.
MasterPilot11
Sun Apr 18, 2004 12:46 am
#59
Carbines maybe, rifles less maybe, but pike and heavy swords weigh a lot, heavy swords. Plus pike would be too cumbersome. You can't spin them both at the same time and not have them hit each other and then stop your attack. Rifle would just be made more inaccurate because you wouldn't have a steadying arm, plus rifles just aren't made to be held in one hand while shooting. Carbines could be possible, be pretty hard though.
NaKitNa
Sun Apr 18, 2004 11:56 am
#60
I agree i would like them fixed as well, but seeing its been 9 months and still waiting, I am not going to hold my breath for fixes, so speaking of rumors is much more interesting.
mka
Sun Apr 18, 2004 4:05 pm
#61
Hmm....
Dual Pistols maybe?
I'm duelling with my DX2 quite fine, thank you. I don't think I need another Duel Pistol.
Keito_Temreh
Sun Apr 18, 2004 5:37 pm
#62
Jedi_Master14 wrote:
I'm sorry, but putting it at master pistoleer ONLY is the most rediculous thing I've ever heard. Who was it in the movies who had dual pistols? Jango Fett. Jango was a? He was a bounty hunter....... So, umm....put it at Master BH and Master Pistoleer so it would prevent any dabbling from other professions....
Message Edited by Jedi_Master14 on 03-20-2004 10:24 PM
Very simple, Jango was a master pistoleer with investigations IV, he didnt take the BH pistol line, carbine, or LLC. Dont assume he was your build.
Page 5 of 5