Pilot Archive

Thread: Focus: Player-Controlled Capital Ships

Doomstein
Sun Jun 19, 2005 3:09 am
#235

I really like the idea of player controlled capital ships, especially Star Destroyers and possibly Mon Cal Cruisers. As mentioned before they should be difficult to obtain, but not ridiculously so. Component schematics for the ships could be obtained through the cashing in of large amounts of prestige points at faction space stations, obtained through new PVE spacequests (in space and boarding missions) and they could be crafted using a huge amount of resources (as it should be) by shipwrites. Smaller capital ships like the Nebulon B frigate, and corvettes would beobtained in a similar fashionbut require less resources.


High prestige PVE missions could be created that require the massive firepower that only a capital ship could provide, like taking out two corvettes at once,or destroying an enemy faction's NPC flagship. PVP will be awesome, the desire for a guild to protect their own flagship while it dukes it out with a rival's will really spice things up.


Capital ships should be expected for use againsed other capital ships and star-bases. I think thecapital ships would have an innate figher vulnerability due to their monsterously slow manuverability. Realisticly players manning capital ship's powerful turrets would have a limited firing window to ward off fighters due to the sheer size of their ship. It is doubtful that they could easily knock out a fast moving PVP fighter without the full cooperation of the crew and/or fighter support. And without fighter support it's be nothing but a big ostentatious bulls-eye.


I think that capital ships would add a new dimention to space combat andwould allow for a more engrossing Star Wars experience.
Colbey98
Sun Jun 19, 2005 3:30 am
#236

Are they going to make it so Imps/rebs can board opposing faction captiol ships to take them over? or blow them up? that would be pretty cool.








~Kevral Dark Side Marauder ~


"Your only salvation is in the New Order. "




(gnn[[[[[[[[[[]nnnWX9gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg)

Cdapolito
Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:43 am
#237


As far as the Corvette is concerned, I would like to see it either 'borrowed' by overtaking it or 'rented' with Prestige. The same goes for any of the cruiser level ships they might add. They should take a huge crew to run (no NPCs) but come fully stocked and ready to go.


For the smaller capital ships these should be privately owned in a special data slot reserved for them (oneper player) or take multiple slots. These should be Shipwright crafted from a RIS-like quest schematic (once learned never forgotten)



  • Rebel: Rebel Gunboat (4 turrets)pilot controlled missilesX2 + forward gun TOTAL of 5 guns 2 missiles

  • Imperial: Imperial Gunboat (5 turrets) pilot controlled missilesX2 NOpilot gun (this offsets the extra turret the ship gets) TOTAL of 5 guns 2 missiles

  • Freelance: Modified Skipray Blastboat (4turrets - one dorsal one ventral and one "ball turret" on each wingtip) pilot contolled missilesX2 +forward gun TOTAL of 5 guns 2 missiles [This is a hypothetical variationand could be used for balance purposes instead of the standard Skipray which the wing guns were controlled by the pilot]

That's only one new ship exterior to design and it's a great looking ship too! Certs to Master Pilots after a quest, maybe also require the co-pilot (or even ALL crew) to beMaster also to keep the regular POBs in demand.


I would like to see them also have space for:



  • a capacitor for eachturret/gun

  • fore, aft, starboard, port, ventral and dorsal armor

  • both fore and aft shields.

By adding 5 capacitors, 6 armor slots and 2 shield slots you could reduce the number ofShipwright made components to mainly Capital Class Reactors to provide for the HUGE power demand these ships would call for.


Basically these are larger POBs that can dish out and take more damage but take more folks to run.


Other ships to think about: Lambda Class Shuttle (3pilot guns (could be made into 1pilot and 2 front-side turrets for balance if necessary), 1 rear turret, no missiles), Imperial Landing Boat (3 turrets, 2 missiles + pilot gun), and of course the YT-2400 (same as YT-1300 with new skin)... yeah i know it'sa POB but it's so pretty

Message Edited by Cdapolito on 06-19-2005 07:03 AM




Itolia Rapo
Master Tailor, Roleplayer, and HELPER
(I'm just a glutton for punishment)


Galaxy City, Dantooine
rols_cerentz
Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:45 am
#238

Capital ships should be fair and equitable.

I agree that in order to own and pull one out, you need to have a Master Pilot Certification. For Co-Piloting, you should have a Master Pilot Certification, for everything else you should only need a copy of JTL or RotW or the "Christening of the Capital Ships" expansion packs.

I believe that they should be ownable by players, not borrowed. I also believe they should be craftable by Shipwrights, but would be extremely costly to build, as in likely needing a 100k pile of resources for various components, such as 100k Steel for the Primary Hull and 100k Steel for the Secondary Hull, along with a pile of other resources for other areas. They could also be only craftable via the aquisition of Schematics for Capital Ships.

This expense alone should keep them rare, especially mixed with the artificial rarity of schematics.

As for use in space, they should be slow. Their max speed should be roughly equal to the modifier on the Y-Wing, perhaps even slower. As for Manueverability... Capital ships should be similar to Semi-Trucks, powerful, but slow to make turns.

What Capital ships should have is potent shields and heavy armor. The shield generators should also be protected from the "cheap" attack of targeting the Shield Generator and then getting into the blind spot and whacking it with a missile. Perhaps Capital ships could have optional Automated Anti-Missile cannons. (Since chaff should be a joke to use with something so slow) Other then that, there would/should be an internal station to repair damage to the shield generators.

They should have guns. Wicked powerful cannons geared either for Anti-Fighter or Anti-Capital Ship combat. The Anti-Capital ship guns should be incredibly powerful, but lack the ability to move fast enough to have a good chance to hit a starfighter, the Anti-Starfighter cannons should be swift enough to target rapidly moving targets, but have much lower damage capability. Each gun, or set of guns, should have their own capacitors as well, which might be seperate targetable components that ship engineers will have to run around and repair while in battle.

For mission profiles, they should support things like taking diplomats from one system to another system traveling through some other system with trips between waypoints in those systems. At all, one or none of those trips between waypoints, the Cap Ship could come under attack from Pirates, Imperials, Rebels, Slavers or even Bounty Hunters.

Durring such a space battle, the enemy could attempt to weaken/destroy the engines and reactor and then attempt a boarding operation. Once the boarding Op happens, the players would need to defend the ship, while making repairs, which could take a good ten minutes, via an automated timer and or require that the players remain in command of the bridge, engine room and the room holding the passenger/captive/whatever.

Then, once the repairs are made, the Cap Ship can take off, with the remaining enemy soldiers, giving up pursuit.

If the battle is going wrong-bad, the characters can attempt to get the passenger to the escape pods and escape with the passenger, when this happens, the Cap ship is set to auto-destruct, popping up the animation similar to the current animation when a character ejects from his/her starfighter. Then, the group recovers on the nearest planet.

The capital ship wouldn't be "lost", but would need to be completely repaired, which should be very costly, it should also be less solid as it used to be, similar to the decay of current starships.

A good crew should be able to make a Cap ship impervious to starfighter attack and be able to go toe to toe with another capital ship with an equal crew or a few cap ships that have poor crews.



--
Check out my NGE Interface Guide here and learn some ins and outs of the NGE Interface.

(1nnrr[[[nnnWX9ggggggggggggggggggggg)


Rols Cerentz
New Republic Order - Lowca
____________________________________________________
KristaKalahari
Tue Jun 21, 2005 4:41 am
#239

Hi,


I was thinking a lot of what it will be like when this goes into effect. I thought that it would be cool , but as I have read that there is a lot of things that will need to be done.


I have an Idea that is similar, but on a smaller scale, and possibly more helpful.


Player Owned Space Stations:


3 kinds: Rebel (PvP), Imperial (PvP), Freelance (Nuetral)

Must be Master Pilor of a Pilot Profession to place one.

Built Like a City/Guild with the same aspecs like maintenance, members, and ect.

Each has upto 4 turrents for defence against attack from PvE and PvP.

Can only be destryoed if Maintenance runs out and is idle with no maintenance in it.

Player can /dock with the station if Nuetral/Own-Faction..

Players can land if they are on the member list for that station. (Limit of how many players on a station?)

Players that are on the station can control the turrents. (Faction base like or Direct control)

Space stations Must be built 2,500m from other space stations, and only a certain number allowed in each system. (Somewhat like cities)

Player built. (Requires multipule professions to build, and a lot of resources to build.)

Player can repair there ships at Nuetral/Own-Faction stations for a price. (This will be a income for the space station.)

Players can /dock with station to transfer cargo from cargohold on Starfighter/POB Ship/Mining Ship to the cargohold of the space station. (AKA Mining Station)

Player can purchase faction ships for a hefty price to ad in the stations defence. Defence ship can onl fly to attack a target within 500m-750m of the station that it was purchased at. ( This will also allow Players to not be able to use Space stations to attack other Space Stations. Without this there would be griefing)

Player purchased station defence ships can only have a limited number of ships active.


There are some other ideas that can be thought about from this, but i think this would be a better route than player rented/owned capitalship. Also this would take less ram to rum on your computer. if you have ever been in Deep space you know what i mean with the lag around the Star Destroyer. Imagine having them in all systems.


Please feel fee to post replies about this idea.


Kista (Kauri Server)
rubianatwarcry
Tue Jun 21, 2005 7:08 am
#240





Ideally:


1. Pilot
2. Co-Pilot 1 (Primary Shields)
3. Co-Pilot 2 (Secondary Shields)
4. Co-Pilot 3 (Flight Computer)
5. Flight Operations Officer (Manages Shuttle Bay/Traffic of friendly ships boarding & leaving)
6. Engineer 1 (Manages/Repairs Reactor)
7. Engineer 2 (Manages/Repairs Engine)
8. Engineer 3 (Manages/Repairs Primary Shield)
9. Engineer 4 (Manages/Repairs Secondary Shield)
10. Engineer 5 (Manages/Repairs Weapons)
11. Engineer 6 (Manages/Repairs Weapons)


12-18. Turret Operators (Gunners)

19. Communications Officer (Designates Suggested Targets and tries to keep everyone on the same page)

20-25. Flight Surgeons (Heals Crew as needed)

26-50. PvP - Defends the ship from boarding party


51-75. Pilots on board ready to defend/attack (Can launch their ships to join the battle)





I wish i knew enough people to man something this way but i cant see 75 people in 1 ship for a long time you know. Unless ur guild has 1000 people which is almost impossible to achieve this would not be a good thing. Yes i think it should be 8+ but not 75.

Barb-Wire
Tue Jun 21, 2005 7:15 am
#241

if i am in a capitol ship and something shorts out and a droid walks out onto a wing panel and gets shot, then another droid walks out onto the wing ppanel and gets shot and some ugly chick with a horse face exclaims "WE'RE LOSING DROIDS!!!!" i will prolly quit.



Created Account July 2003 - Canceled account Nov 2005. The NGE made me do it.
Barb Wire
Former Dark Force Wielder
Ex-Imperial Navy
Ebeneesker
Wed Jun 22, 2005 5:53 am
#242

I love the idea of capital ships. I have been fantasizing about it from the day one of JTL.

I understand that it is a very hard thing to code and balance.
Also making a capital ship obtainable for everyone (whether via quest or purchase) will clutter the space with massive ships and cause a lot of problems.
For this I have a vision, I'm sorry if it's already been suggested but there are too many posts for a through search. Having said that here is my proposal:

I think to limit the number of capital ships effectively they should make it available only to guilds. Obtained through a series of multiplayer quests which will give the PA ,whose members completed the quests, the ability to craft a capital ship or just simply as a reward. This reward capital ship should be deedable by the PA leader and he should be able to give authorization to certain PA members to pilot it. Also I would suggest that player city shuttle ports should be used for these ships parking lots and they should be operatable only from the guild's port. Which will limit the number of these ships further for it will require a PA to have it's own shuttle port therefore a certain population. Another possibility is to add a maintanence cost for owning the ship to the city's treasury.

The quests and how it can be made PA only is beyond me but I'm sure a reasonable solution can be worked out. Assigning capital ships this way will limit the number of big ships fighting in space and be balancing in a single stroke. Also it will give PA's a new opportunity to work together. And since owning a capital ship privately is very hard from a realistic point of view it makes sense to make them available only to organizations such as PA's.

As for the game play on board these ships there are limitless options. Such as making them dockable to player fighters. Making them repair and reload stations for allied ships. Boarding action and the like.

This imho will make swg a truly star warsy game. And I doubt if I'd ever set foot on land if I can get to ride in a capital ship.




Ebenwakit the Wookiee
Master Droid Engineer
Master Artisan
MasterShipwright

Eben Inc Vendors at FRF MALL, FREEDOM CITY, DANTOOINE

Banaster
Wed Jun 22, 2005 2:49 pm
#243

First of all lets dispel some myths.




Capitol ships other than the largests vessels are perfectly capable of landing on planets.Many shipsup to and includingan Imperial Strike Cruiser can enter atmosphere and land anywhere. Plus in the case of the Corellian Corvette they are in use by far more than just the Empire or the Rebellion. Private corporations use them, planetary governments, smugglers and etc. So as long as you have an I.D. that will stand up to scrutiny you should be able to land at any starport with a big enough facility.



Next the idea of huge numbers of crew. Keep in mind the grouping system will only allow eight members ina group. Any number much larger than this and the group becomes far too unwieldy to manage in text chat. Not everyone has teamspeak or other voice programs and since they are not provided by SWG for its customers they should not be required to manage new material.


Now the Idea of boarding Cap ships? Fun but why bother when you can just blow it up? And why shouldn't the player Captain of a player ship be able to scuttle it to avoid capture? Keep boarding actions for Npc ships and stations I'd say. It's ridiculous to have player cap ships that take huge resources to build or great effort to quest and then to have them capturable right away. If you can't board and capture Nova couriers, YT's, Decimaters or Y-8s there's no reason to board or capture other player ships. If you were to make them capturable then you might as well make Ion Cannons disable vessels like they are supposed to in the Star Wars universe.


Now as to the types of ships.


Forget gunboats. Anyone that has done any flying in Kessel against the mission gunboats there knows they handle way too much like fighters. What's the point of having another Nova, YT, Decimater, or Y-8 with a few more guns? Instead keep it to Corellian Corvettes and maybe the Warlord Heavy Cruiser that cruises in Dathomir for Freespacers. The huge ISD already lags out a system whever it fires it's close range guns. I have a top end system that can handle most of it but a great many players do not. Keep the ships simple.



Now how about craftible versus quest ships? If Capitol ships are craftible then shipwrights will no doubt charge incredible amounts of credits for them. I should know I am a shipwright lol. However if they are simply questible than the shipwrights lose out on a great deal of fun. I'd love to be able to builda capital class ship. Solution? make some cap ships buildable and some craftable, just like the player fighters are.



Now, the hindrances and benefits. Any Cap ship is going to be a huge friggin target. Without fighter escorts it's pretty much going to be a sitting target whether you are talking about PVE or PVP combat. Keep in mind PVP gunners are generally much less acurrate than PVE gunners. So just having them around means there had better be some pretty hefty benefits other than just "They look cool." There needs to be tangible benefits to having a capitol class ship. Otherwise they are just going to be another POB ship that never gets used. How about finally revamping the system to have movable cargo? (which we should have for the other ships anyway and I'm not talking about asterois resources. Wasn't this supposed to be addressed in a Smuggler's revamp that never happened?)

How about benefits to building and repairing damaged ships and components while aboard a Cap ship? Shipwrights could then make a living by hanging out on these ships to repair incoming fighters. Maybe mitigate the chassis and comp damage a bit when it's repaired on a player Cap ship verses a repair from an NPC station?


Now about crew. Certainly a number of people need to be required. But this doesn't need to be a huge amount. One of the great turn-offs of Everquest was that at certain points you couldn't do anything without 70-75 people. SWG doesn't have the requisite population to support this. An alternative however is to make droids usable for a number of crew tasks. Not only would this require further investment to man the vesel but it would give the languishing droid engineer profession some help.


Next, please, please let's try to keep any new additions in the context of the star wars universe? SWG and JTL already bend the rules in so many ways as it is I don't even want to think about it.



Finally and in my mind most importantly once changes are made can they be well and thoroughly tested before they are introduced into the game? I'm still mad that when flying my Y-8 in combat I get no credit or component rewards because it hasn't got that silly loot box the other POB ships have. There are already so many fixes needed for bugs in the game that lets make sure to weed them out in testing before any Cap ships go live.



That being said, let's have some cap ships then.



Banaster


P.S. I apologize if I have repeated too many previous ideas. A guildmate told me about these posts and I didn't have time to do more than scan 11 pages of them.
KJFett3
Wed Jun 22, 2005 5:28 pm
#244






Banaster wrote:

First of all lets dispel some myths.


Yes, lets do just that....




Capitol ships other than the largests vessels are perfectly capable of landing on planets.Many shipsup to and includingan Imperial Strike Cruiser can enter atmosphere and land anywhere. Plus in the case of the Corellian Corvette they are in use by far more than just the Empire or the Rebellion. Private corporations use them, planetary governments, smugglers and etc. So as long as you have an I.D. that will stand up to scrutiny you should be able to land at any starport with a big enough facility.


While you are correct, nothing larger than a Vic would likely be entering the atmosphere. True, there are stories of SSDs etc that did land...or where built on the surface....for all normal operations, those ships would stay in space...leaving the planet's gravity can put a big strain on those larger ships. Now, with that in mind...its one thing to sneak a X-wing into Theed. Its another to land a Carrack Cruiser in Coronet. Bigger the ship, the more it sticks out. Also, the Spaceports we currently have are too small to handle anything larger than say 75m. Theed might be able to handle the large ones...its Spaceport is pretty large, but we would need to see a retool of the other Spaceports if they are to launch from them.


Next the idea of huge numbers of crew. Keep in mind the grouping system will only allow eight members ina group. Any number much larger than this and the group becomes far too unwieldy to manage in text chat. Not everyone has teamspeak or other voice programs and since they are not provided by SWG for its customers they should not be required to manage new material.


Actually you can take far more than 20 up onto an MP/POB ship. As for being too large.... We managed just fine with 20 players for almost 18 months with no problem. I don't see that being an issue. SOE didn't cut groups down because of communication issues either. They did it as it is easier to balance raid content on a group of 8 than it is a group of 20.


Now the Idea of boarding Cap ships? Fun but why bother when you can just blow it up? And why shouldn't the player Captain of a player ship be able to scuttle it to avoid capture? Keep boarding actions for Npc ships and stations I'd say. It's ridiculous to have player cap ships that take huge resources to build or great effort to quest and then to have them capturable right away. If you can't board and capture Nova couriers, YT's, Decimaters or Y-8s there's no reason to board or capture other player ships. If you were to make them capturable then you might as well make Ion Cannons disable vessels like they are supposed to in the Star Wars universe.


Most people want to deal with capitalships like faction bases. Boarding a player ship isnt intended to capture, but to destroy. Save the capture stuff for NPC ships. Naturally, in this case, destorying doesn't mean gone...it means back to the spacedock where you will need to repair before getting back into the action.


Now as to the types of ships.


Forget gunboats. Anyone that has done any flying in Kessel against the mission gunboats there knows they handle way too much like fighters. What's the point of having another Nova, YT, Decimater, or Y-8 with a few more guns? Instead keep it to Corellian Corvettes and maybe the Warlord Heavy Cruiser that cruises in Dathomir for Freespacers. The huge ISD already lags out a system whever it fires it's close range guns. I have a top end system that can handle most of it but a great many players do not. Keep the ships simple.


I agree there, and many others do as wel...350-450m max for a ship. Anything larger is askig for ht esame trouble that we get from the ISD already in DS.



Now how about craftible versus quest ships? If Capitol ships are craftible then shipwrights will no doubt charge incredible amounts of credits for them. I should know I am a shipwright lol. However if they are simply questible than the shipwrights lose out on a great deal of fun. I'd love to be able to builda capital class ship. Solution? make some cap ships buildable and some craftable, just like the player fighters are.


I think the best way is to make Cap ships questable (steal from a shipyard for example) and make the parts for them craftable, and not lootable..or only lootable from other cap ships so they are rare. That seems to me to be the most balance. Cap ships are simply too large to be made by one single SW. The parts however....it would make since for an SW to make them.


Now, the hindrances and benefits. Any Cap ship is going to be a huge friggin target. Without fighter escorts it's pretty much going to be a sitting target whether you are talking about PVE or PVP combat. Keep in mind PVP gunners are generally much less acurrate than PVE gunners. So just having them around means there had better be some pretty hefty benefits other than just "They look cool." There needs to be tangible benefits to having a capitol class ship. Otherwise they are just going to be another POB ship that never gets used. How about finally revamping the system to have movable cargo? (which we should have for the other ships anyway and I'm not talking about asterois resources. Wasn't this supposed to be addressed in a Smuggler's revamp that never happened?)

How about benefits to building and repairing damaged ships and components while aboard a Cap ship? Shipwrights could then make a living by hanging out on these ships to repair incoming fighters. Maybe mitigate the chassis and comp damage a bit when it's repaired on a player Cap ship verses a repair from an NPC station?


I agree, Cap ships at the least should require at least a Novice SW to be fully functional, but they shouldnt be taking huge amounts of damage either.


Now about crew. Certainly a number of people need to be required. But this doesn't need to be a huge amount. One of the great turn-offs of Everquest was that at certain points you couldn't do anything without 70-75 people. SWG doesn't have the requisite population to support this. An alternative however is to make droids usable for a number of crew tasks. Not only would this require further investment to man the vesel but it would give the languishing droid engineer profession some help.


I think droids would be acceptable as long as it 250m ship isnt fully peratinal with 3 guys and a bunch of droids. Droids should be able to do some tasks, but manning turrets needs to be by players for exmaple.


Next, please, please let's try to keep any new additions in the context of the star wars universe? SWG and JTL already bend the rules in so many ways as it is I don't even want to think about it.



Finally and in my mind most importantly once changes are made can they be well and thoroughly tested before they are introduced into the game? I'm still mad that when flying my Y-8 in combat I get no credit or component rewards because it hasn't got that silly loot box the other POB ships have. There are already so many fixes needed for bugs in the game that lets make sure to weed them out in testing before any Cap ships go live.


We can only hope on this one. Hopefully the loot box issue is a bug tho...the YT-1300 made it into the game without a loot box as well.


That being said, let's have some cap ships then.



Banaster


P.S. I apologize if I have repeated too many previous ideas. A guildmate told me about these posts and I didn't have time to do more than scan 11 pages of them.

There are a lot of good ideas in the 11 pages...we can only hope the devs take the time to read them.









!Drevin of DROW!
!!
werehere
Wed Jun 22, 2005 6:13 pm
#245

YEs you guys are in the right directiob.


I am a master sw but what can we do on the ship what would br our purpos besides running any spot we want i am a ace so i could pilot too.


I say have a screen for shieds kinda like in episode one were they show the sceen . put max power less from guns. ect.


for engines yuo see anikin put power into the other engine in pobrace seen.


copilot controls droids


pilot pilots


master gunner tell people were to fire


gunners


boarding captin also protects ship plus his assult crew.


hanger captin - flight controller some modified corvettes held x wings ties in a small haner they modifed x wing series. also some docked ties in escape pod parts book five x wing series.


someone does mini game for reactor can put more power to certin things while putting less top others .


sw- do not know but good to have one to repair flight mechanic then


kazzabev master sw and freelance ace




MysticMoose
Thu Jun 23, 2005 11:54 am
#246


I haven't had time to read through the entire thread... there are some good ideas on how to limit or control capital ships, but as someone said back on page 2 people will have them simply because they can. I was explaining the process for becoming a Jedi to a friend that doesn't play SWG the other day... and at each point he thought I'd say "then you're a Jedi" I would go on into the next thing you had to do. He asked me why there were even Jedi on any of the servers, let alone as many as it seemed.


The thing is that no matter how hard you make it to get something, most people are going to want it if they think it's something good or something that makes them special because everyone will believe that they've earned it whether it's good or not. Or they'll want it just because other people have it.There should be a major cost, and I don't think that a huge cost in materials, money, time spent questing, quest difficulty, or status is going to mean much... people will just work that much harder to earn or harvest such things.


I think that capital ships should have their own advanced profession off of pilot... Starship Officer (or something)and unlike pilot, should cost skill points that go toward the existijng total number of skills you can havejust like architect, bounty hunter, or pistoleer would, for example... in addition to any other suggestions for limiting the proliferation of capital ships. I think if you want to tool around the galaxycommanding a city-sized armored arsenal you should have to make a sacrifice somewhere else in your character. For example, be a combat monster on the ground, or be Godzilla in space... your choice. But it should be a choice.


Any cost to get or make these ships isn't going to be meaningful in the long run whehter it's status, rank, money, guild status, quested, resources harvested... people will grind out whatever is needed to meet those costs and you'll see more and more capital ships over time. There has to be a realcost that can't bemitigatedwithtime but requires a sacrifice on the part of the player(time invested in something is ultimately a meaningless limitation in an MMO, because people will take the time required),where people have to decide: You can have this, but then you have to give up being that.


However, the skill trees for such a Starship Officer profession would give something back... perhaps a skill line called Automation could allow the officer to replace stations that it is required that a player operate to be operated by a droid. You'd have a skill line that would grant a different "rank" to the starship officer and therefore affect what class of ship he can command. And so on. I don't think that it should be so limiting no one would want to have a capital ship, and there should be some cool features, but I do think it should cost something tangible (money, status and resources are not tangible in an MMO, they generate spontaneously and without limit, they are simplyrepresentationsof time invested in the game.)

Radio_Raheem
Thu Jun 23, 2005 1:32 pm
#247

And now for an unpopular opinion.


For continuity's sake, there should be no player-owned capitol ships beyond the Corellian Corvette level. A: They are too big. You know that everyone and their mothers will want one and then space will be SWARMING with them. B: in the SW universe IMP star destroyer captains/admirals didn't OWN there ships, the Empire did. They were merely rendering a service.


Secondly, SD's and Mon Cal cruisers should be static, meaning that they do not spawn and they should be limited to certain sectors with one or (at most) two in to a system. Probably One of each in Tat, Naboo, dantooine, etc. For the REALLY uninhabited systems (yavin, endor, etc.), there shouldn't even be any SD or Mon Cals. Core worlds like Corellia and Talus should have several. These ships should be able to be taken of\ver by players for in-system patrol and for specific battles as they relate to the GCW. dozens of players could board the vessels to battle each other. Once everyone onboard a ship is killed a new set of players gets to crew it and the opposing ships warp away from eachother so they can search for eachother again and battle.
Page 19 of 34