Pikeman Archive
Thread: The true pikeman
BalexSlicer wrote:
And if I designed the class we would be designed to fight on mounts :shrug:
Message Edited by Krul on 07-27-2004 10:42 PM
Arcdischarge wrote:historical note
A lone pikeman (even a superior one) would almost certainly be slain by a single competent cavalryman. Now everyone should know that cavalry was sure death for infantry, which were nearly helpless against it, except for the pike. The value of the pike against cavalry was in the ability to form a tightly knit square of pikes facing outwards, with either archers or rifleman (pick your century) behind. Time and time again it was shown that horses, no matter how well trained or driven, shy away from the pikes at the last moment, making a well-formed square a safe-haven for infantry. However, a single gap in the square could mean death for everyone inside. Failure to quickly replace a fallen pikeman or to squeeze down the square would allow penetration by cavalry, and the resulting disorganization from even a single mounted warrior meant breakdown of the square and death to infantry. Even well trained infantry could be provoked into breaking their lines at the sight of charging horses, and sometimes did.
This battleground between pikeman (infantry) and cavalry formed the basis for military strategy & tactics on land from the Dark Ages to (arguably) 1800.
So following that logic it would make the best sense to have pikemen be able to create a defensive position from which they cant do as much damage as normal.
For instance have center of balance give REALLY good defense modifiers, but at the same time lower attack to less then half, or something like that, since you cant have as good a pike barrier if youre swinging your pike about. (or maybe you can but for balance sake).