Musician Archive

---

psikobunny wrote:

---

Raees wrote:

Also I'd like to ask you guys what you think of the fact that we no longer have to beboth Musician and Dancer to give a complete buff ?

---

I want the differences between the two to be more than cosmetic

---

It looks to not have any differences, but rather that they stack.

From the article, it looks like you will be able to get it from ANY level of ANY entertainer, but one quote seems to make it look that the fastest version of it will be from a "double master dancer/musician with +25 skill tapes". The only people who I know with that are only sorta people, they are buffbots.

I think that this bears repeating over and over....

This is a Buffbot Re-Vamp!

Fragpuppie Uber
Master Entertainer, Master Musician
Founding Member - Frag's Puppies
President and CEO - Fragpuppie Enterprises and Uber Instruments
Coronet, Corellia, Chilastra

---

Aleyo wrote:
The thread introducing this concept is here. Go post your feedback!

---

---

Echinacea wrote:

---

Aleyo wrote:
The thread introducing this concept is here. Go post your feedback!

---

I posted the following. I'm just...worn out. I can't even muster the energy to get angry about it.

---

---

You and me both.

I'm just astounded they'd throw this at us, what a sick joke. And what's sicker is that it's no joke.

I've no idea what was in their heads when they devised all of this.

I can only hope we can get through to them, but I'm too wiped out from everything at this point. I'm so tired of expending the energy for all of this nightmare that I'm actually taking a more positive angle on things, lol. Being upset and trying to take sense into the Devs seems to just waste time and energy. So, I'm with ya. Just don't have the energy.

If they want us all to be buffbots, I'll tell them what I think of them, and I'll hit the road. I play a game to play a game, not macro it...and whena Dev team for a game decides to make it easier to macro a group of professions already nearly destroyed by macroing, well - they deserve to lose the money from all 3 of my accounts, and they deserve what they get from my "exit survey" after hitting the cancel button.

See, even that wiped me out.

I need something to drink.

---

sweatyclimber wrote:

I posted this in the inconcept thread and it sums up my thoughts on these:

I was very much undecided on if these were good or bad untill I thought it through. I am sure that its been voiced about the concerns for buff bots regaining the "thrown" ect ect... but thats not what Im here to talk about.

At least half of the players I know have free sp's... and lots of them! So now those people can go pick up novice buff their group drop it and move on. So with that being the case, we are now completely useless... In the CU i have yet to heal *any* BF. So honestly we are useless... even if I had healed some, it is a system that really doesn't "retard" or hurt a combatant enough to force them "inside". So even if thats all we had... with all the other changes, that was the same as nothing

I don't know a single proffession where the "most usefull" and the highest income potential skill is in the novice box... So where I was going to give it my thumbs up, now I have to wonder what you were thinking. Please fix or remove this.

---

---

Fragpuppie wrote:

This is a Buffbot Re-Vamp!

---

Exactly.

And unless we push for it to be anything other than that, that's exactly what we'll get. Because that's what the Devs threw at us. I'm not sure any of their claims of not liking extended unattended play hold any water if the totally passive system they described goes Live.

If it does go Live and encourage buffbots like I fear it will, the day the Publish hits Live no one will ever hear from me on these forums again. Because then all I've been babbling about and fighting for the past year has been fruitless, because the Devs made it EASIER, freakin' EASIER, to be a buffbot. Hell, if that's the way they want me to play, then I'll find a game that encourages me to play and not macro the entire time I'm online. I was a huge fan of FPS's before coming to SWG, so perhaps I could back to that and catch up on the latest ones. They're looking pretty cool lately.

Message Edited by LadyP on 04-05-2005 03:19 PM

 __                            __      __
|  |    __   __  ______       |   \  /   |  ____
|  |    \  \/  /|   _   \  _  |    \/    | / __ \  
|  |___  \    / |  | |  | (_) |  |\  /|  ||  ___/
|______|__\  /  |__| |__|     |__| \/ |__| \____\
        \___/


							

nevermind.

Message Edited by Warryyr on 04-06-2005 04:55 PM

---

Bronski113 wrote:
As long as it is going in the direction that most of us want. That is what I care about and that they realize that they really should read what we write, or at least the version that our correspondants give them.

---

---

Aleyo wrote:

---

Bronski113 wrote:
As long as it is going in the direction that most of us want. That is what I care about and that they realize that they really should read what we write, or at least the version that our correspondants give them.

---

I think things will be looking pretty up. And from what I can tell, the feedback from people in the in concept thread has been looked at directly, besides my collecting and consolidating.

As for what version we correspondents give, I usually try to give just about any feedback that has gotten at least some support from various people; I'll present the majority opinion as the majority opinion, and then include "also, blahblah" for others. I do my best to include the reasons people have for having their opinions as well; basically, I want them to hear just about what everyone has to say, and to have some idea of what's the most popular, and why.

---

Thanks Scip, you're a man among men.

I don't know what's going to happen in the end, but I actually feel better after reading your posts.

It's amazing what a little communication can do, eh?