Jump To Lightspeed Archive

Thread: Enemies warping, still in from Beta!!

Tinozza
Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:41 pm
#79

Same here.
Full scan doesn't seem to work for me, and even if it worked it is for sure an unacceptable workaround.
I'm not used to complain of anything, but this makes the game absolutly unplayable.



Ragphen Robec, Master CM of the Starsider Galaxy since launch
RedRogue
Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:53 pm
#80

Everything was working fine for me since the 28th. Today I had another random client freeze and CTD while using the starship terminal. When I logged back on and launched into space the infamous 'bee dance' had returned. I experienced this three times in beta and the only resolution was time. Eventually after a few days a patch would roll out or something or other would miraculously cure the warping. The symptoms are normal ping, normal fps, no displayed packet loss, and extremely high bandwidth recieved, ships warping everywhere, capacitor not depleating from firing and targets not taking damage or delayed damage while you take damage from them.


Trust me, this has nothing to do with proccessors, memory, or any kind of hardware. It has nothing to do with firewalls, routers, NIC cards or connections. This is purely something that happens to the client that prevents it from recieving proper updates. Some have theorized due to the high bandwidth recieved that the server is trying to send to many updates too often and the client cannot sort it out resorting in the warping and that the sent updates are not being properly qued by the server resulting in non damaging hits and non draining capacitors.


I did not once see a developer respond on this issue before, I would be greatly humbled if that where to occur here but I am always highly doubtfull of that occurance as the problem appears to fix itself on and off and is not a permanent issue therefore not of high concern to them.
raz1337
Tue Nov 02, 2004 1:28 pm
#81

I'm running a Geforce 4 Ti 4600 =P


There goes your theory, hon



Annoka Starkep ~~~~~~ Danielle Sevi


Jedi are like ants in an ant farm, you watch them work and play, and if one is being bad, you squish them
Marcus-
Tue Nov 02, 2004 1:57 pm
#82

I've send a ticket about this 2 days ago and the CSR that responded said he was experiencing the same problems. He told me that I should /bug it ingame when it happens, so the devs will know the severity of it. So I advice everyone to do the same if you haven't allready done it.




Marcus- Laurentius @ Chimaera
>> Scoundrel,>> Smuggler Alliance Ace Pilot
Dwebis @ Chimaera
>> Demolitionist,>> CorSec Fighter Pilot
Bashar29
Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:28 pm
#83

Ive applied what this guy says here : [url]http://www.numlock.ch/news/archives/000280.html[/url]


Ive also noticed a considerable boost in preformance. I must say that since sp2 my PC was not as good as before the patch. I immediately saw a new easeness in windows. Do not uninstall sp2 but do try this simple modification and see if it will change anything in SWG. Ill report after trying again the first mission in JTL.
Bashar29
Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:36 pm
#84


Wel, well, well! I may have found the culprit. The fix from the link I mentioned above resolved the drunken bees problem. Here's the complete info so that you can try it yourself :


XP SP2's Data Execution Prevention and Performance Hits

Did you notice a severe performance decrease after having installed Windows XP SP2? You're not alone. Unfortunately, I lack the time for an in-depth performance comparison of XP with and without SP2. So I just ran the demo benchmark of 3DMark2001, once with SP2's new Data Execution Prevention (DEP) enabled, once disabled (I rebooted my box before running each test).


3DMark2001 results on my box (higher values are better; the absolute values don't matter here unless you're interested in the absolute 3DMark2001 performance of a Toshiba Portégé M200 with 768 MB of RAM):


XP SP2 with DEP disabled (AlwaysOff): 4601
XP SP2 with DEP enabled (OptOutOptIn, i.e. the default setting for SP2): 3299


Oh my! I did expect a performance decrease, but not such a big one! And it's even a 3D benchmark ("normal" application benchmarks might even show worse results for DEP)! So, according to these measurements (don't quote these measured results please; they're statistically not significant as I haven't measured a series of test-runs, only one run per test), enabling DEP (enabled by default after installing XP SP2) results in almost 30% lower 3DMark2001 performance! It's your choice whether the improved security of your box is worth this huge performance hit. For a server it might be (it's still alarming though), but for my M200 TabletPC, it definitely isn't. If you like to disable it too, here's how to do it:


1. disable write-protection of c:\boot.ini (see the properties dialog)
2. in c:\boot.ini, replace "/NoExecute=OptIn" by "/NoExecute=AlwaysOff" using a text editor (e.g. notepad)

mattygb
Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:26 pm
#85

I had this problem in beta as well. I couldn't even play for the majority of the time. Then I did a full scan, followed by a defrag, followed by a hard boot, and my problem went away.


I have similar specs.

AMD +3200

ATI 9600

A7N8X-E deluxe mobo

1 gig ram


I have not experienced this in live yet (cross fingers) but I feel the pain. I even got fraps to post movie clips showing it.


Another I did, was make sure I have no other windows open that are using the internet the same time I am playing. So check for hidden spyware, etc to make sure the pipe is clear.



Kidy Icae Da'g W'myn Etese Icae
Shipwright Bothan Elder BountyHunter
ggggggggggggggggccXX\\//\\//XXccgggggggggggggggg
Located in Aegis, Corellia
Please drop off all winnings @1641 -6627

RedRogue
Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:44 pm
#86

Turned DEP off and no more bee dance.
raz1337
Tue Nov 02, 2004 5:24 pm
#87

What about us people on windows 2000? do we try the same thing?



Annoka Starkep ~~~~~~ Danielle Sevi


Jedi are like ants in an ant farm, you watch them work and play, and if one is being bad, you squish them
Capt_Moroni
Tue Nov 02, 2004 5:36 pm
#88

I did a full scan last night before I played. It worked, and I have SP2, and am not from the UK.



Filoviridae Infortunus
Droids N'Things
3468 -5908 Fayth, Corellia
Droids N'Things II
-674, 364 New Coventry, Corellia
Sarnokh
Tue Nov 02, 2004 5:51 pm
#89

Bashar, thx first for the great help. But can you explain what the original settings are supposed to do?



"I felt a disturbance in the Force... as if millions of voices cried in fear and were suddenly silenced. Something terrible has happened."
raz1337
Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:58 pm
#90

/cry



Annoka Starkep ~~~~~~ Danielle Sevi


Jedi are like ants in an ant farm, you watch them work and play, and if one is being bad, you squish them
Dragoslaf
Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:18 pm
#91






Bashar29 wrote:


Wel, well, well! I may have found the culprit. The fix from the link I mentioned above resolved the drunken bees problem. Here's the complete info so that you can try it yourself :


XP SP2's Data Execution Prevention and Performance Hits

Did you notice a severe performance decrease after having installed Windows XP SP2? You're not alone. Unfortunately, I lack the time for an in-depth performance comparison of XP with and without SP2. So I just ran the demo benchmark of 3DMark2001, once with SP2's new Data Execution Prevention (DEP) enabled, once disabled (I rebooted my box before running each test).


3DMark2001 results on my box (higher values are better; the absolute values don't matter here unless you're interested in the absolute 3DMark2001 performance of a Toshiba Portégé M200 with 768 MB of RAM):


XP SP2 with DEP disabled (AlwaysOff): 4601
XP SP2 with DEP enabled (OptOutOptIn, i.e. the default setting for SP2): 3299


Oh my! I did expect a performance decrease, but not such a big one! And it's even a 3D benchmark ("normal" application benchmarks might even show worse results for DEP)! So, according to these measurements (don't quote these measured results please; they're statistically not significant as I haven't measured a series of test-runs, only one run per test), enabling DEP (enabled by default after installing XP SP2) results in almost 30% lower 3DMark2001 performance! It's your choice whether the improved security of your box is worth this huge performance hit. For a server it might be (it's still alarming though), but for my M200 TabletPC, it definitely isn't. If you like to disable it too, here's how to do it:


1. disable write-protection of c:\boot.ini (see the properties dialog)
2. in c:\boot.ini, replace "/NoExecute=OptIn" by "/NoExecute=AlwaysOff" using a text editor (e.g. notepad)







What if I don't have a boot.ini file?
Page 7 of 26