Jump To Lightspeed Archive
Thread: just a thought
Makkaio
Sat May 14, 2005 12:40 am
#248
Yeah. Our scatters might as well be a sign on a stick that reads, "I'm a BH and I'm Here to Collect". *puts his sign down* I just don't equip mine until my bomb droid goes off, that's all.
We all have our own little ideas and tweeks to the game. I'd love it if we had an ability to disguise ourselves. I'd even be willing to share the skill with smugglers. Allow us to hide our badges andmakeour scatters look like other non-BH specific weapons. Stuff like that.
shadowdragon2k
Sat May 14, 2005 12:42 am
#249
IMHO i feel that the Mbhbadge should be like the jedi badges they dont show up on your bio still use the tag but not on the bio (i mean Like Msabers or Mdefender dont show on a jedis bio)
how many times have you been examined had the Mbh badge on you then get banned from a city or your marks ran away
-Dragonmane-
Mon May 23, 2005 8:34 pm
#250
Okay, I am jedi paddy, worth about 120k, I am about 300k in the hole from BH attacks. I have spent more time killing BH then actually playing the game. I was hoping SOE would actually come up with an idea about how BH hunt and what happens to jedi after they kill a BH. Maybe, and this is just a thought, let the jedi get xp for every BH kill. That would off set the loss of xp when actually killed by a BH. If they even attempted this, I would be master ls now lol. Or, if they dont like that idea, have the BH actually loose xp himself, it is PvP by the way. Like I said, just a thought.
crusher001
Tue May 31, 2005 2:35 pm
#251
was trying to think of a way to help with the jedi/BH situation with out doing a massive overhaul of the system
what if...
a BH kills a same faction jedi they lose 10k faction
when faction falls below 0 they are removed from there faction
with this system the BH that want to be traitors to there on faction can still hunt there own faction but and a cost
i think this would reduce the number of BH after each mark
(thought of this when i watched 2 cl80 reb BH hunting 1 CL22 jedi in my group)
after all what faction would suport a person for hunting there own?
MDBangs
Tue May 31, 2005 2:41 pm
#252
Every bounty hunter would go nuetral, or bring a friend of the opposite faction to deathblow them.
thatgod
Sat Jun 18, 2005 2:51 am
#253
what about this idea. when frs is back making it so a knight gets a change in xp gained. like getting xp as a normal profession would. just a thought flame if you like
skotadi
Fri Aug 05, 2005 3:07 pm
#255
can ids give people scars if not ya should makes the warriors look like they did somethin maybe make it a level thing so non combat types cant get the full set level 80s can
ArchiieBarrett
Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:32 pm
#257
Ok what if they gave Non-CH the abilty to control up to level 15 again.... ok yes I am a MCH and have been a long long time and yes it is coming from my noggin. I think that now, with the new system, a non-ch with a level 15 pet wouldnt be a threat.
1. Level 10 pets are just simply too weak and I know alot of people hwo arnt CH but like to have pets, want to fight beside them without having to worry about it dropping in 1 hit fomr a level 80 mob. More level 15 and so pets have ranged and better defense, plus a larger variety cause no non-ch wants a kreetle...
2. BE pets grow to size now. A level 15 full grown BE Cu pa IS a mountable size... This gives BE the ability to make the non-ch BE mounts again... WE though as CH have to train it for size and mount it anyway... unless the BE is both.
I just think with the new system and the way things work now that it would be safe for a non-ch to have a level 10-15 pet. There are no super BE pets anymore and the more mounts the more $$.
CritterControl
Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:46 pm
#258
if you want a better pet then level 10 then become a CHand spend the points to dabble in it or become a master. i wouldnt say "i want to use a lightsaber" and not expect to spend points to be able to use it. in my opinion non-ch should only get mounts and entertainment pets. i dont think they should have the ability to use them in combat. its the point of the CH profession. i know many wont agree with me but its my 2 cents
ArchiieBarrett
Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:50 pm
#259
ok Now see I know exactly what you mean, cause thats how I felt.... but do you have a second character? One that you dont want to make a CH... but you are ued to fighting with your pets...
also A non-ch cant obviously go out and tame thier own.. we would HAVE to do that for them.. and train it so it is bigger cause a non-ch doesnt have the ability to train it and make it grow, mount it, teach it specials, commands or even control it at maximum like CH.. we do get some CH bonuses as CH. So its not like we give noobs or non-ch pets and they start reaking havok like pre-cu super Level 10 pets.. I just think that it is a little unfair to only be able to use some of the super weak level 10 pets and that level 15 is ideal and lets BE mounts grow to the right size.
CritterControl
Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:59 pm
#260
well if they prevented non-ch from using them in combat then sure ill accept them having lvl 15s so they can have decent sized mounts. however i dont think its right for them to use a weapon they arent qualified for in combat. and yes i do have an alt and yes it does have lvl 10s but i never use them in combat. both are strictly mounts. if they want to use better pets in combat then they need to become CHs. whats the point of being a CH if every joe schemo can use a pet? i tolerate the lvl 10s because mounts area part of SW but there was a time where only CHs could use pets. and thats the way it should be except for mounts