Jump To Lightspeed Archive
Thread: Jedi Starfighter Vs. Belbullab-22
Sorry here are the stats from the strategy guide.
Ship:HP:Mass Capacity:Blasters: Missile:Handling: Armament: Defense:
WandererJedi wrote:
Sorry to be pushy but all I want to know for sure is if the jedi starfighter is positively more maneuvarable than the grievous fighter
Dude, its so close, its not even worth aching over.
Then why is everyone saying the Jedi Starfighter is so much better than the Grievous?
WandererJedi wrote:
Then why is everyone saying the Jedi Starfighter is so much better than the Grievous?
Reading comprehension FTW.
Smaller. Hit. Box.Its been said in this thread at least once, if not twice. The Bel-22 presents at least a 50% larger target to enemy guns. Running a 75+ YPR Engine, with EO3 or EO4, you're so goddamned squirrelly in either of them, the difference in performance is utterly moot. The fact that the Bel-22 is larger, means its easier to put a hit on it. A shot that would pass harmlessly by a JSF, would tag a Bel cold.
The inability to be hit is NOT a perfect defense, though. I've gunned down Royal Guard Interceptors with guns alone. That small hitbox is a margin, it is NOT an "I Win" mechanic.
JanuHull wrote:
Reading comprehension FTW.
Smaller. Hit. Box.Its been said in this thread at least once, if not twice. The Bel-22 presents at least a 50% larger target to enemy guns. Running a 75+ YPR Engine, with EO3 or EO4, you're so goddamned squirrelly in either of them, the difference in performance is utterly moot. The fact that the Bel-22 is larger, means its easier to put a hit on it. A shot that would pass harmlessly by a JSF, would tag a Bel cold.
The inability to be hit is NOT a perfect defense, though. I've gunned down Royal Guard Interceptors with guns alone. That small hitbox is a margin, it is NOT an "I Win" mechanic.
WandererJedi wrote:
Sorry
Ship:HP:Mass Capacity:Blasters: Missile:Handling: Armament: Defense:
Grievous' Starship 1800 90k 2 1 .79ModerateModerate
Jedi Starfighter 1650 90k 21 .65Moderate Light
And remember it's from an official strategy guide.
yeah lol those stats are not entirely correct. if you check the pilot FAQ as mentioned by Attacca, you will find that these two ships do in fact have the exact same stats.
lol, you should have sold it to him, pob ships are useless
Personally, I'd like to see both of those poonfighters nerfed into oblivion and beyond. The Actis-2 especially. I will never fathom how a ship half the size of an A-Wing will have 50% more mass, an extra gun port and superior inherent maneuverability.
Firesped wrote:
I'd rather see all the original ships have a little more maneuverability than seeing the Actis-2 and such get nerfed. Flying the actis-2 felt much more like the movies than the launch ships.
Sorry bub, PvE in space is trivial enough as it is. I flew my entire Crimson Pheonix squadron in a crafted component equipped, stock X-Wing with only RO4 and EO3. I can solo anything in the game but a Corellian Corvette and I have an A-Wing and Advanced X-Wing kitted up expressly to hunt Actis-2's, and I'm not even close to the best there are flying right now.
If the space game were to get any easier, I'd have to put a Y-Wing Longprobe together so playing up there wouldn't bore me to tears and drool. As it is, I've been known to throw a mix of Spacebomb IIs and Proton Mark IVs in my Nova and go solo missions.
It just doesn't need to be easier. I'd rather see these snotnosed punks, who think sitting in an empty turret to grind up to 4333 just for their little peasy fighter they think entitles them to compete with me, learn to fly, rather than making space so easy a demented retard with an IQ less than 20could ace in seven hours.