Jump To Lightspeed Archive
Thread: Where are the suns?
Mordoc
Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:50 am
#14
Speaking of missing stuff, where's Centerpoint Station in the Corellia system?
Sneeuwlok
Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:35 am
#15
Nebulae are the birthplace of stars, so, i think 2 nebula has to fall in love, so they give birth 
truewildman
Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:37 am
#16
Sneeuwlok wrote:
Nebulae are the birthplace of stars, so, i think 2 nebula has to fall in love, so they give birth
There's enough nebulae in any given system for an orgy.
Oop...did I type that out loud?!
Zeon_Zaku
Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:41 am
#17
Tatooine has suns... I think. Well... atleast it has three planets floating around it, maybe they're moons. Anyhow... you're right, though. None of the planets have suns. Especially for Tatooine, we need suns. Even if they're just peeking out from behind a planet.
ComCypher
Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:43 am
#18
When flying around in space I have seen things that may be suns, because they look slightly larger than the other stars. However they don't produce any sun glare or anything when you look at them.
In regards to the nebulae, I know why they bother people because they certainly don't appear in the movies. But ironically, seeing how we are complaining about the lack of suns, can you recall ever seeing those in the movies (in space that is)? I sure can't.
Com Cypher
JakinIrali
Mon Dec 13, 2004 12:39 pm
#19
JoKen_Jash wrote:
I am so annoyed by the dev's lack of realistic thinking. No suns, tons of nebulae... Did the stars all go supernova or something? Look at every scene of footage showing the space around these planets in the movies. What do you notice? No nebulae. Not even the slightest hint of it.It literally hurts my eyes to fly around the Yavin sector, even with nebula density down to minimum. And, on most planets, you can't see the suns either. And where the heck are those 2/3rd drawn Star Destroyers orbiting half the planets anyway?
First of all, if you want realism... everytime you go into space, turn off your sound. There's no noise in a vacuum 
Ok, I hate to get into this. I really do. Because I know flames are gonna fly. But, Star Wars was never trying to be about what's realistic. Real space ships couldn't fly like that. Laser beams can't bounce off one another like how the Death Star focuses it's primary cannon. Real asteroid fields are scarcely hard to navigate because the distance between rocks is HUGE. Our space probes travel through the asteroid belt all the time without hitting anything and they don't need any mad flying skills in order to accomplish it. A giant space worm living in an asteroid? No air, no food, -300 degrees F temperature... what's it do sit around for a thousand years to once in a while catch a tiny ship for dinner to sustain it for the next thousand? Traveling underwater through the core of a planet without getting crushed by the pressure (even with super-advanced technology, getting around this would be practically impossible)? If it was only protecting the Death Star II, why did the shield generator have to come offline in order for Tyderium to land? Comeon... people. It's not meant to be ultra-realistic. A realistic space fight would be VERY boring and has never been done in a sci-fi movie... EVER.It's meant to be cool and look cool, not to have every nuance that defies the laws of physics be ripped apart. And the reason there's so much 'terrain' in space games is to give you something to "fly around". There has never been abattle of in Star Wars that didn't have terrain of some sort, whether it be the Death Star, a bunch of capital ships, or asteroids. It adds spice to what's going on. Imagine the battle overEndor without a bunch of Star Destroyers and Corvettes to see the pilots manuvering around. How less exciting that would be.
As for the Star Destroyers.. they're on the opposite side of the planet. Duh 
Oh yeah... back on the topic of the original poster. I agree there should be suns. I'm thinking perhaps the only reason they didn't include them was maybe they thought the blindness caused by it was too annoying. Nebula hurt your eyes? You think staring into the sun would be less trouble?
Message Edited by JakinIrali on 12-13-2004 02:45 PM
WillinB
Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:18 pm
#20
Yeah, I know galaxies isn't always realistic-its fantasy. I think its more about what is seen in the movies (nebulae) and what is missing (suns). I would just like to see suns, they don't even have to give sun glare. Just some added detail. 
P.S. The name of our solar system's sun is called "Sol." I think it is technically correct to call any other solar system's central star a "sun."
P.S. The name of our solar system's sun is called "Sol." I think it is technically correct to call any other solar system's central star a "sun."
truewildman
Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:38 pm
#21
Yeah. You know the "Fi" in Sci-Fi means? Science Fiction. It ain't real. And guess what? It doesn't have to be!!!
Physically speaking, can you imagine the havoc two stars as close to each other as they are in Tatoo would do to anything within a light year?? What they would do to each other? The astronomical anomolies in Kessel come to mind...
Oh, and Kessel.....don't even get me started there....
Fiction. All pure fiction. 
JakinIrali
Mon Dec 13, 2004 3:51 pm
#22
If anything based on our current knowledge of black holes,I'm thinking Kessel would have to be the center of the Star Wars galaxy. And if that's not the case, it WILL be the center of the galaxy eventually...
Btw, if we really want to get technical, stars that haveexploded are theorized to leave behind nebulae too, so maybe there's your answer about where the suns are. Why the planets weren't vaporized... umm... er... I'm just shutting up now.
Btw, wildman.. "there are enough nebulas in the system to have an orgy"... that was classic. That made me laugh hard.
ROBO1964
Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:06 pm
#23
Just thinking about it and I don't recall seeing any suns while in space in any of the Star Wars Movies.
JakinIrali
Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:39 pm
#24
Only for very brief moments. Episode I when Amidala's ship first approaches Tatooine, and asthe Milennium Falcon is leaving Bespin, the sun peeks out from behind the planet. I think those are the only two occurrences.
Zutan
Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:12 pm
#25
Not all black holes reside at the center of a galaxy.. "super massive" black holes are thought to be at the center of galaxies (such as our Milky Way) but there are other much less massive black holes around.. which is essentially what the "maw" in Kessel would be.
JakinIrali wrote:
If anything based on our current knowledge of black holes,I'm thinking Kessel would have to be the center of the Star Wars galaxy. And if that's not the case, it WILL be the center of the galaxy eventually...
Btw, if we really want to get technical, stars that haveexploded are theorized to leave behind nebulae too, so maybe there's your answer about where the suns are. Why the planets weren't vaporized... umm... er... I'm just shutting up now.
Btw, wildman.. "there are enough nebulas in the system to have an orgy"... that was classic. That made me laugh hard.
ShadowSaber5
Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:24 pm
#26
I know the answer to where they all went....
They all went to the black holes in kessel...there is THOUSANDS of them...
some of you were mentioning kessel but never bluntly said it...
so thats my opinion...they are all in kessel being sucked out of existance.
They all went to the black holes in kessel...there is THOUSANDS of them...
some of you were mentioning kessel but never bluntly said it...
so thats my opinion...they are all in kessel being sucked out of existance.