Jump To Lightspeed Archive
Thread: whats the FREAKING problem?
Page 11 of 11
Owen-Lars
Sun Aug 15, 2004 8:02 pm
#131
Cause you can be certain that all the carebears will not. And in general, it is those people that are the most fun to kill hehe =)
But would it cease to be fun when your actions cast missery on that player?
booger1980
Sun Aug 15, 2004 8:22 pm
#132
finally someone admitted that they like to kill PVE players because its more "fun".
THAT is exactly whats wrong with PVP and why most players dont like it. . you guys arent happy only playing against other PVPer's. which should be more than enough for you.
at least someone admitted it. its what ive been saying all along
XStarbracer
Sun Aug 15, 2004 9:00 pm
#133
Im glad someone was brave enough to say what the real issue is, you PvP morons (well most of you) like killing Coverts, and PvErs because its more fun to you to make people suffer, thats the problem, Im not here for your amusement and niether is anyone else. Grow up or get some counseling if you find fun in other peopels misery, its not healthy. If you were to do that stuff in real life you'd probaly end up in jail. I'll now qoute something that sums up what PvPers really enjoy "Cry more noob" that right there plainly is what they find fun. Personally when i go overt, i love killing you people especially when i see you trying to gank noobs for enjoyment.
WegdeAntillys
Sun Aug 15, 2004 9:07 pm
#134
i personally dont like pvp on the ground,and i agree pve is more fun,but we dont even have the game yet,but because of my multyplayer flight sim XP,im geusing it will be this way,iv even played mmo flight(ww2 online) and it was prety close to npc,a bit more boring yes but that was just trying to get places and there being nothing to do on the way,but thats besides the piont,becauseof this im feeling that u guys will like pvp just as much pve,they r so different on the ground for obvios reason,JTLS combat will be much more close im betting,if im wrong and you guys are right i geus you have a few good pionts,it could be worse
XStarbracer
Sun Aug 15, 2004 9:21 pm
#135
I might PvP, but the thing for most people is they dont want it 24/7, they dont want it suddenly. If most people PvP its when they choose to, which is why PvP zones are the best solution. Though i really hate PvP, i dont derive any pleasure from killing PCs, i do it sometimes to help my friends out but i dont get any sick perverse pleasure in it, and i dont shoot peoples bikes and laugh.
MariketheWookiee
Sun Aug 15, 2004 11:14 pm
#136
the reason i rarely pvp, unless i know the person and we are just having a little fun with it is, pvp'ers are USUALY too agreesive people... they find sick pleasure outa destroying bikes, and killing noobs for some reason... at least thats been my experience with pvp across quite a few games...
BrotherDavius
Mon Aug 16, 2004 12:11 am
#137
To people saying pvp should be kept apart from pve.
Why?
This is a online multi-player game right?
So if 3-4 impplayers decide to go on a patrol and see a star desrtoyer under attack why should they not be able to help the star destroyer. Also same battle or mission a group of rebs come along see the star destroyer under attack, they can attack it and help destroy it.
How is fair? how dose that make the gcw better?
calomac
Mon Aug 16, 2004 12:20 am
#138
becouse not everyone is into pvp. if its there mission to destroy that star destroyer, take it as a lose to the empire. they dont want you to get involved becouse they only like pve. if you want to pvp then go find some rebs that want to pvp with you and have a ball. you people need to learn how to respect other peoples playing styles. and no, im not taking a side, im just plan on staying neutral/privateer so i can safley watch some of you fools have fight's out in space with my friends.
BrotherDavius
Mon Aug 16, 2004 12:50 am
#139
calomac wrote:
becouse not everyone is into pvp. if its there mission to destroy that star destroyer, take it as a lose to the empire. they dont want you to get involved becouse they only like pve. if you want to pvp then go find some rebs that want to pvp with you and have a ball. you people need to learn how to respect other peoples playing styles. and no, im not taking a side, im just plan on staying neutral/privateer so i can safley watch some of you fools have fight's out in space with my friends.
Hang on, what if other rebs join in (not part of the group that took the mission to blow up the star destroyer) and attack? why can the imp player not join in?
Sheeb
Mon Aug 16, 2004 12:57 am
#140
/AGREE
Devs, I LOVE the idea that you have to be overt to pvp. and if you are in a certain zone you are deemed attackable... This is GREAT... now can we just have a warning when we enter a danger zone? (ie pvp)
NickW152
Thu Feb 03, 2005 4:06 pm
#141
IF YOU DON'T WANT TO PVP DON'T PLAY A GOD DAMM ONLINE GAME!!!!!!
Yet another pathetic, unthought out, childish response.
If you want to spend all your time PVPing go play a 100% PvP game like planetside. Face it SWG ISN'T 100% PvP okay. If it was made 100% PvP I think 90%+ pf the player base would leave.
For those who keep sayingsomething along the lines of: "what will I do if I see a tie being attacked by a sqaud of rebels and I can't help"
If its anything like the ground the Imp NPCs will beextremely tough and travel in groups of 10/20 (like Storm Troopers, I'm a Master marksman with a decent weapons load out yet I can't take on one let alone a squad), so only aces will be a ble to takre on the whole group.
Also if you remember fromA New Hope,when Han and Luke see the lone Tie whereAlderan should be, they say something along the lines of:
"whats aTie doing in the middle of space, they can't go far from their bases"
thus I doubtyou will find any t/fs without a ISD or likewise nearby. Its the rebels I worryfor.
Finally for all you PvPers who refer to the non-PvPs as "carebears" or "creampuffs" or such. Thats just proves the sterotype that we have for you: spoilt 12yr old brats who have nothing better to do than make other players lives a misery (apologies to the rare PvPers who are sensible, honour bound players)
Page 11 of 11