Jedi Archive
Thread: Saber Slash -> Fire
Would people agree that if sabers should continue to "dot" opponents, it would make alot more sense if Saber Slash put opponents on Fire rather than causing them to Bleed?
Message Edited by MsNiL on 10-24-2005 05:47 PM
well,
actually every saber hit should cut the limp off.
hmpf, sadly this are not the movies :/
but yes fire would in this case make more sense, since a saber would cut off and also burns the wounds so no bleeding ocurs
I dont really agree, bleed as bad enough (since sabers cauterize all wounds) but fire just is too far.
I think it should be a 1 in 10 chance to decapitate the bh. Like last ditch
And with the rolling head graphic to. That would be great.
Beware the decapitate move ![]()
Message Edited by Grienthumb on 10-24-2005 03:44 AM
MsNiL wrote:
Would people agree that it would make alot more sense if Saber Slash put opponents on Fire rather than causing them to Bleed?
That would make too much sense.
I would add that the type of damage could be based on the type of crystal...Bane's is electrical, I believe, so an electrical dot would be interesting, or whatever the dot based upon the crystal.
The purists would hate my addition, though, so at the least I would love to see fire damage instead of bleeding.
Wolf
think it should be a 1 in 10 chance to decapitate the bh. Like last ditch And with the rolling head graphic to. That would be great.
Beware the decapitate move