Jedi Archive
Thread: Which sabre is better?
Page 1 of 2
Boscuia
Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:12 pm
#1
LS. A
2.25 Attack Speed
1.3 Modified A.S
591-687 Damage
206 Elemental Heat Damage
44.7% Wound
376.00 Estim. DPS
651.00 Mod. DPS
100 SAC
11 FC
LS.B
2.43 Attack Speed
1.4 Modified A.S
584-681 Damage
206 Elemental Heat Damage
47.45% Wound
343.00 Estim. DPS
595 Mod. DPS
95 SAC
10 FC
Lightsabre A is pre CU Lightsabre B is Post CU.
2.25 Attack Speed
1.3 Modified A.S
591-687 Damage
206 Elemental Heat Damage
44.7% Wound
376.00 Estim. DPS
651.00 Mod. DPS
100 SAC
11 FC
LS.B
2.43 Attack Speed
1.4 Modified A.S
584-681 Damage
206 Elemental Heat Damage
47.45% Wound
343.00 Estim. DPS
595 Mod. DPS
95 SAC
10 FC
Lightsabre A is pre CU Lightsabre B is Post CU.
Ogathma
Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:17 pm
#4
Lightsaber A. I have used sabers with up to 114 SAC and havent had much an issue with action, so personally, the extra damage is worth it. I did a lot of playing around, and I have decided that for me, SAC of 100, and whatever is left into damage is how I craft them.
Gondon
Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:17 pm
#5
a. There is not much of a difference between 11 and 10 fc. Same with the 5 pts of sac. Both sabers still woop mine lol.
DeathKnightSoth
Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:20 pm
#6
Looks pretty close though...Juz wondering if it really matters on stats that close in comparison?...Prob. not
Ogathma
Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:22 pm
#7
DeathKnightSoth wrote:
Looks pretty close though...Juz wondering if it really matters on stats that close in comparison?...Prob. not
The damage matters. Otherwise, not really.
Bib-Fortuna
Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:22 pm
#8
Boscuia wrote:
LS. A
2.25 Attack Speed
1.3 Modified A.S
591-687 Damage
206 Elemental Heat Damage
44.7% Wound
376.00 Estim. DPS
651.00 Mod. DPS
100 SAC
11 FC
LS.B
2.43 Attack Speed
1.4 Modified A.S
584-681 Damage
206 Elemental Heat Damage
47.45% Wound
343.00 Estim. DPS
595 Mod. DPS
95 SAC
10 FC
Lightsabre A is pre CU Lightsabre B is Post CU.
B.
Although small that SAC and force cost could save you. Sometimes the difference between winning and losing is a single heal, you wanna risk losing just to have a tiny +6 damage?
Sandsifter
Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:29 pm
#9
Peeps always seem to flock to more damage but they would be wrong. Its simply not worth 6 extra damage points to risk running out of force or action.
And I had the same situation, oddly my sabers were nearly identical to yours. The lower action saber did make a difference in a long fight a few times.
Gondon
Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:34 pm
#10
its not the damage that people favor saber A. over B. here. Its the speed. There is a marked advantage to being able to hit faster. Itsthe ability to do more damage, over a short period of time, than your opponent can heal. If you can do this, than fc is not a problem.
Message Edited by Gondon on 09-05-2005 10:35 PM
Elven_Prowler
Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:37 pm
#12
WHOA! I'd definately go with B. 1 FC not much?! Not if you are just grinding. But if you're going uber, and by the looks of these two, I'd say you are, 10 to 11 is 10% more FC. That'll mean when you go up against someone with a FC 10 you will run out of force 10% faster figure a good fight is 2 minutes... 12 seconds.Just my thought though. The damage and speed seem to be proportionally minimal. With good food I never run out of action in single target fighting. I only run out of action when I try to alternate Spin and Dervish.
Bib-Fortuna
Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:54 pm
#13
Gondon wrote:
its not the damage that people favor saber A. over B. here. Its the speed. There is a marked advantage to being able to hit faster. Its the ability to do more damage, over a short period of time, than your opponent can heal. If you can do this, than fc is not a problem.Message Edited by Gondon on 09-05-2005 10:35 PM
Yeah, so you'll have higher force costs AND use it faster.
If your opponent is one of those extremely rare people that can heal then it doesn't matter if you attack a bit faster, they'll just wait for you to run out of force.
Page 1 of 2