Jedi Archive
Thread: lets put an end to the myth and conjecture....about crystals/pearls (need all jedi 2 read)
):Best was mid 80ish, no better so far.
Hactar wrote:
nope, i collect premiums everyday, nope nope nope, not even close.
Um k
I've done about a dozen "good" crystals since CU. Best is 85/85 -5.
I have gotten a distribution that looks almost like a perfect bell curve (high in the 80's, low in the 20's most in the 50's-60's. If what Tiggs tells us is true, then the "quality" rating just shifts the curve towrds the high end.
Remember that we are dealing with the "Law of Large Numbers." It's the principle thatkeeps casinos in business. A single spin of the roulette wheel is meaningless. So is any small sample. It may come up 24 black ten times in a row. That doesn't mean there is a pattern. It means the sample is much too small to draw any conclusion. It's only after thousands/millions of spins do you get the real picture. So, while any individual's experiencetuning may be interesting, it is meaningless from a statistical point of view. We would need the results of millions of tunes to draw any conclusions.
Hactar wrote:
nope, i collect premiums everyday, nope nope nope, not even close.
plz share from where you are getting prems plz
jcesare wrote:
I've done about a dozen "good" crystals since CU. Best is 85/85 -5.
I have gotten a distribution that looks almost like a perfect bell curve (high in the 80's, low in the 20's most in the 50's-60's. If what Tiggs tells us is true, then the "quality" rating just shifts the curve towrds the high end.
Remember that we are dealing with the "Law of Large Numbers." It's the principle thatkeeps casinos in business. A single spin of the roulette wheel is meaningless. So is any small sample. It may come up 24 black ten times in a row. That doesn't mean there is a pattern. It means the sample is much too small to draw any conclusion. It's only after thousands/millions of spins do you get the real picture. So, while any individual's experiencetuning may be interesting, it is meaningless from a statistical point of view. We would need the results of millions of tunes to draw any conclusions.
agreed, but if we assume like many people have said over a 100 and some over 50 or so...would guess each reply at actual of like 30 then maybe we can get a rough idea.