Jedi Archive
Thread: Uh, this looks bad...
sexade
Tue Nov 08, 2005 6:44 am
#40
MsNiL wrote:
Do you consider "people who actually liked the old SWG system" a "market"?
sexade wrote:
No, SOE turned this game into the ginger stepchild of WoW/KOTR/CS in attempt to fleece the even more gullable console market before the game truly dies.
Star Wars fans have loathed it since day one. Most quit back in 2003-2004 due to the hollow grinding, lack of content and no star wars feel.
Do you really think there is a market for asub standardFPS with cheesy graphics? How many of the elite console kids will be bored of it within a couple of hours never to play again? Wheres your market now? Oh thats right, SOE and their carebear cheerleaders alienated them all, grats
WinkerPeeper
Tue Nov 08, 2005 6:44 am
#41
MsNiL wrote:
BHM wrote:
No wonder you were againt player bounties and frs, and are against pvp...
I am not against pvp. It's quite fun in other games.
1on1 fights doesnt work in an rpg and becouse of that forced-pvp is a horrible idea, and SWG had a really broken system and there was no effort from soe to make pvp fun.
The problem is, many thousands of people both in these forums and in the game itself disagree with you. That's what you either cannot see or refuse to accept.
Pday
Tue Nov 08, 2005 6:50 am
#42
4.5 million disagree with her and are playing wow right now, several million playing lineage, and lineage 2, several hundred thousand playing EQ 1 and 2 right now, a mill or so playing FF 11, this just shows how little MSnil really knows about this type of games.
WinkerPeeper wrote:
MsNiL wrote:
BHM wrote:
No wonder you were againt player bounties and frs, and are against pvp...
I am not against pvp. It's quite fun in other games.
1on1 fights doesnt work in an rpg and becouse of that forced-pvp is a horrible idea, and SWG had a really broken system and there was no effort from soe to make pvp fun.
The problem is, many thousands of people both in these forums and in the game itself disagree with you. That's what you either cannot see or refuse to accept.
catanho
Tue Nov 08, 2005 7:03 am
#43
this is the end for you my master....... i will do what i must ...... you will try !!!!!!!
MsNiL
Tue Nov 08, 2005 7:06 am
#44
Asume what you like. I have finished most adventure and rpg games releasedto pc since 1998, of which games such as Baldurs Gate 2, Knights of the Old Republic and Syberia tops my list.
Pday wrote:
this post made so many things clear that i didnt relize before, why you hated this game among other things. This was not a first person shooter, the fun in pvp in RPG's is the focus on the character rather on the reflexes of the person behind the keyboard. I play swg to play an RPG, i have quake 3, UT, battlefield 2 and halo for the FPS type combat.
I just relized how much of a liability you are, and how you never should have bought this game.
I do not see the point of pvp'ing 1on1 in a roleplaying game. First becouse RPG's is about co-operation.Second becouse RPG's are about numbers and dices.
lordchimp
Tue Nov 08, 2005 7:08 am
#45
I was laughing hard when MsNil was like YOU GOT PWNED. Ahaha carebear just owned all of you.
You get around!
catanho wrote:
this is the end for you my master....... i will do what i must ...... you will try !!!!!!!
You get around!
MsNiL
Tue Nov 08, 2005 7:08 am
#46
Thoose who are left here either eh... "like" swg for the system, or are star wars hopefuls.
WinkerPeeper wrote:
The problem is, many thousands of people both in these forums and in the game itself disagree with you. That's what you either cannot see or refuse to accept.
The "Thousands" here who "like" the game as it is, do not match the "Billions" Star Wars fans out there.
MsNiL
Tue Nov 08, 2005 7:10 am
#47
How do you equal "not playing swg becouse it sucks" with "disagree with me"?
Pday wrote:
4.5 million disagree with her and are playing wow right now, several million playing lineage, and lineage 2, several hundred thousand playing EQ 1 and 2 right now, a mill or so playing FF 11, this just shows how little MSnil really knows about this type of games.
Pretty much all players who I started the game with moved to wow since wow offered content and stuff to do, regardless if you wanted to pve or pvp.
catanho
Tue Nov 08, 2005 7:11 am
#48
I was laughing hard when MsNil was like YOU GOT PWNED. Ahaha carebear just owned all of you.
You get around!
catanho wrote:
this is the end for you my master....... i will do what i must ...... you will try !!!!!!!
You get around!
what else can you say about this nge i'm more or less given up that statement sums it up perfect for me 
BHM
Tue Nov 08, 2005 7:12 am
#49
Just because you don't see the point, doesn't mean that 1vs1 pvp should be removed from rpg games.
MsNiL wrote:
Asume what you like. I have finished most adventure and rpg games releasedto pc since 1998, of which games such as Baldurs Gate 2, Knights of the Old Republic and Syberia tops my list.
Pday wrote:
this post made so many things clear that i didnt relize before, why you hated this game among other things. This was not a first person shooter, the fun in pvp in RPG's is the focus on the character rather on the reflexes of the person behind the keyboard. I play swg to play an RPG, i have quake 3, UT, battlefield 2 and halo for the FPS type combat.
I just relized how much of a liability you are, and how you never should have bought this game.
I do not see the point of pvp'ing 1on1 in a roleplaying game. First becouse RPG's is about co-operation.Second becouse RPG's are about numbers and dices.
If RPG is based on number and dices, and swg is (supposed to be) an mmorpg, why is the NGE better? The NGE is more inclined to FPS skills than on numbers and dices. Yet you're making sure to post everywhere how the NGE is a bless for the game. The old systems were A LOT more rpg inclined.
keysy
Tue Nov 08, 2005 7:18 am
#50
MsNiL wrote:
Do you consider "people who actually liked the old SWG system" a "market"?
sexade wrote:
No, SOE turned this game into the ginger stepchild of WoW/KOTR/CS in attempt to fleece the even more gullable console market before the game truly dies.
Star Wars fans have loathed it since day one. Most quit back in 2003-2004 due to the hollow grinding, lack of content and no star wars feel.
noob
MsNiL
Tue Nov 08, 2005 7:19 am
#51
I have never asked for duels to be removed.
BHM wrote:
Just because you don't see the point, doesn't mean that 1vs1 pvp should be removed from rpg games.
If RPG is based on number and dices, and swg is (supposed to be) an mmorpg, why is the NGE better? The NGE is more inclined to FPS skills than on numbers and dices. Yet you're making sure to post everywhere how the NGE is a bless for the game. The old systems were A LOT more rpg inclined.
And I have a twisted feeling for NGE so do not asume I am all bells and whistles over it.
There's no difference between the NGE or pre-NGE for roleplayers, except that pre-NGE there was some mechanics that interrupt and worked against playing a Jedi "by the book".
NGE is godsend to pve players who want to adventureand explore. It's exactly what we always asked for.
But frankly, the controls suck right now.
catanho
Tue Nov 08, 2005 7:23 am
#52
god- send ????
this is the end for you my master....... i will do what i must ...... you will try !!!!!!!