Jedi Archive

Thread: GET your money back for the expansion

St1lgar
Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:18 am
#27






Wolf24601 wrote:

If someone really wants to do this:


1) Start a website we can sign up on so you can gather contact information

2) Find a lawyer who wants to make a name for him/herself

3) Get ready for a long fight.


Yes, we can sue. No, it won't be easy. No, the EULA/etc. does not grant immunity to a company for behavior like this.


Wolf





sounds like a plan
Xyrus_D_Virus
Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:20 am
#28


lol wanna hear a great story? Well I'm going to tell it to you anyways . Ok so I had ToOW preordered for about 2 weeks before it came out on the 25th. I played for a day or two and was like, damn, I wasted $30 for this pos? Anyways, two days ago, I get an email from SOE saying that there was a problem where I apparently entered the wrong credit card ifo and they couldn't bill me. They said I could play for another week and unless I could put in a valid credit card, ToOW would be taken off my account. YAY! 3 free weeks of the ToOW. Apparently I know how to work the system



---=Cicero=---
Colonel of the Imperial Army
Dark Jedi Elder
Fall to the Dark Side, join the Sith'
Welcome to Sisko!!!
jimmyjonson
Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:24 am
#29

Quit already nos is washed up, GO cry a river somewhere else



Tha Champ Is Here!
Petor Dunfrizo
UUxxxx((( StarSider )))xxxxUU
((( Galaxy )))
U Cant SEE ME!




Aries1
Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:45 am
#30

What the original post is trying to say, and is not covered by the eula, is


SOE intentionally kept the release of the nge quite till after the release of toow in order to boost sales of the new expansion. Know that knowlege by thier customers of the nge would hurt sales of toow.


There by committing fraud.


In a suit you can get access to the documents and e-mails outlineing this stratagy, if they exists you can prove fraud and win the case.


The eula does cover soe to make any changes they see fit, it does not how ever allow them to desive their customer for profit.


bluemaddog
Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:52 am
#31

let me knoe how to get in on this.... i need those $29.00 back dag it...



-Madog-
TheEnemyofmyEnemy
ismyfriend.


KRAKEN666
Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:53 am
#32



for those friends we have overseas and dont truly understand the legal process of u.s. courts. when class actions are brought around or even in this case will be a class action by a goverment agency towards a company for shady business practices the monies awarded are not just awarded on how much you have paid for the games and your subscriptions. Most of the damages are imposed to keep the company from doing it again to future customers. IE. microsoft damages assesed for anti trust violations to other software makers was about 15% for the loss of income to vendors other than microsoft and the other 85% was awarded to the goverment as a type of fine for doing bad business practices. Never think that 100%the monies assesed in finesgo directly to customers or the amount of fined levied is based on that figure of revenue gains....the majority of it goes to the goverment for having to prosecute the case and as a penalty not to do it again.



as a side note on the one post about sony getting sued, that is the sony music division which is secretly putting a tracking type program onto their music cd's that when you copy a sony label cd it leaves a spyware onto the new cd and can track copies and buying habits of the users. this is being looked into because sony did not tell anyone that they are doing it and violated customer trust..hmm, sounds familiar. In my research the most interesting suit against sony, and probably soe now, is the suit from a family who's son got "addicted" to the WOW. This guy quit his job, alienated himself from his family, and eventually commited suicide over some game issue....the family is suing because soe doesnt have a warning label on the box saying these types of games have the potential to be "addictive". Beleive it or not.



Message Edited by KRAKEN666 on 11-09-2005 09:05 AM

Message Edited by KRAKEN666 on 11-09-2005 09:09 AM

Page 3 of 3