Jedi Archive
Thread: Jedi must be able to wear armor now,the reason is simple
MsNiL wrote:
Mythrindir wrote:
jedi do have armour now bud.
its called defender
Do Brawlers have ArmorBreak so TKA can use it?
Do Marksmen have T-21 Rifles so Carbineers can use them?
Defender is not "Jedi", it's one form of many.
jedi can CHOOSE to include defender or force armour in their templates. brawlers can CHOOSE to include the armourbreak, or the innate armour, or a warcry, or a whatever.
And cojonelse you talk nonsense.go learn some background information before you play game.
Message Edited by WarriorOfDarkness on 10-27-2005 01:48 PM
IMO dont want armor dont need armor i have force armor (yes i am aware it eats up force) and force aura thats all i need im a post-cu jedi with nothing but good quality pearls in my saber, i have only died once since i hit full temp (well done wescott) and have only died once more after pub 24 (well done doomsdae) other than that im doing fine and have continued to kill bh's that come after me.
thats my 2 cents you can either like it or not doesn't matter
Cojonelso wrote:
so no need for Making Jedi wear armor.... you will have armed to the teeth armored targets soon enough.
Oh an BTW....... in what movie is a Jedi wearing armor again....I seem to have missed that...
Well here is a linky for joo
Obi-wan wore armour in the now canonised(according to starwars.com) Clone Wars cartoon. I'm not saying this is a good thing just providing some proof for you to look at ^^
WarriorOfDarkness wrote:
see.. most people wont wear it,but dont hinder people who wants it! basically i prefer an armor break sliced 350 health giving armor instead of jedi armor or force armor. fair trade.
Lets add more reason to this in the WEG and WOTC RPG's you can wear blast vests while being a Jedi and as they are armour that means you can wear any armour if you so choose, the idea that armour blocks the force is complete bantha poodoo. However attack speed and general speed should be encumbered by doing so, this will help to balance the wearers and non-wearers if it does get implemented.
WarriorOfDarkness wrote:
for encumbarance reasons it can also made like usual profession thinking doctor and combat medics can wear armor without hindrances. when jedi hits a mastery box all encumbarances will be gone. or let it jedi powers can wear recon armor, jedi enhancer can wear battlearmor,lightsabre wears assault armor and defenders wear no armor like teras kasi.
this would make defender basically useless if you havent noticed...xx4x is all anyone would get except for the diehards.
AzuraTrikach wrote:
I agree that Jedi have lost their power, but I don't want armor to be the compensation. As a Jedi I don't want to wear armor, to me it has nothing to do with Jedi. There is a long list of bugs and issues that might give uspower (and more fun) if solved, I support the fix of these bugs and issues instead of giving armor to Jedi.
Message Edited by AzuraTrikach on 10-27-2005 11:10 AM
Mythrindir wrote:
jedi can CHOOSE to include defender or force armour in their templates. brawlers can CHOOSE to include the armourbreak, or the innate armour, or a warcry, or a whatever.
Nah. Jedi is THREATENED to include defender or force armor in their templates.
Yes, at gunpoint.
Or at riflepoint really.
This is whyI would balance it by having attacks being slower if wearing armour than if using Innate, Defenders would be faster offensively than an armoured Jedi so there is a pros/cons system for going one way or the other.
Mythrindir wrote:
WarriorOfDarkness wrote:
for encumbarance reasons it can also made like usual profession thinking doctor and combat medics can wear armor without hindrances. when jedi hits a mastery box all encumbarances will be gone. or let it jedi powers can wear recon armor, jedi enhancer can wear battlearmor,lightsabre wears assault armor and defenders wear no armor like teras kasi.
this would make defender basically useless if you havent noticed...xx4x is all anyone would get except for the diehards.