Jedi Archive
Thread: FRS and peoples crap
The FRS (Old or New) will NOT becoming with ToW... i was in BETA, and the ONLY FRS that was their, was the OLD FRS.... and the only reason why it was their, was because they had NEVER deactivated the OLD FRS from that Server....
IT IS NOT COMING BACK WITH ToW
Altyrell wrote:
The FRS (Old or New) will NOT becoming with ToW... i was in BETA, and the ONLY FRS that was their, was the OLD FRS.... and the only reason why it was their, was because they had NEVER deactivated the OLD FRS from that Server....
IT IS NOT COMING BACK WITH ToW
i knew it. it was to good to be ture.. thanks for cleaning that up
/close
no frs 
I want to recommend several series of comics and books from this timeline that describe in great detail a part of Star Wars lore, outside of the movies, that you may have missed. But I think even you can use Google, or hit theforce.net for that matter.
There's more to the story and timeline than the movies, even current and upcoming game content has shown that. Dark Jedi Knights and Adepts do in fact exsist.
With all due respects...
/salute
Message Edited by DiKan on 10-20-2005 07:39 PM
DiKan wrote:
no frs
I want to recommend several series of comics and books from this timeline that describe in great detail a part of Star Wars lore, outside of the movies, that you may have missed. But I think even you can use Google, or hit theforce.net for that matter.
There's more to the story and timeline than the movies, even current and upcoming game content has shown that. And we've had this post before.
With all due respects...
/salute
Message Edited by DiKan on 10-20-2005 07:38 PM
are you talking about Dark jedi nights? they are sith.. and as fair as SWG go's its ONLY have the rights for episode 1 2 3 4 5 6 . noting else.. So Dark jedis should be Sith's
all good, not tryin' to argue. I am also not familiar with what parts of the legal liscence SoE has for the story content. Exar Kun's story and temple can be seen in Tales of the Jedi, and we've seen stuff from KOTOR lately, and that was 4000 years prior to this time setting. /shrug. Sith were originaly a culture of people, and early Sith Warriors were not trained in the force. ah, it's all good.
Message Edited by DiKan on 10-20-2005 07:43 PM
DiKan wrote:
all good, not tryin' to argue. I am also not familiar with what parts of the legal liscence SoE has for the story content. Exar Kun's story and temple can be seen in Tales of the Jedi, and we've seen stuff from KOTOR lately, and that was 4000 years prior to this time setting. /shrug. Sith were originaly a culture of people, and early Sith Warriors were not trained in the force. ah, it's all good.
Message Edited by DiKan on 10-20-2005 07:43 PM
im not trying to argue also. im just saying has any one ever heard just once about Dark Jedi knight in the movies? yoda obi-wan anakin, mace windu, they all call them Sith .or Sith lords not Dark Jedi. its just weird thats all.
Message Edited by Manbush on 10-20-2005 04:48 PM
Manbush wrote:
there at dark jedi who are not sith, remember can only be 2 sith at a time, they were reffered to as sith cos the ones in the movie were sith, any other dark jedi that were alive at the time were not sith
Message Edited by Manbush on 10-20-2005 04:48 PM
that sounds like Sith and Dark jedis are the same thing... or are they not the same? what makes them sith and dark jedis?
Because the term Sith was never heard from the dialogues in the original trilogy, early Expanded Universe products usually considered the "evil Jedi," those who joined the dark side of the Force, as "Dark Jedi." In his famous novel series The Thrawn Trilogy, author Timothy Zahn labeled Sith Lord Darth Vader and Emperor Palpatine as Dark Jedi, and the term "Sith" was never mentioned in the series.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Jedi)