Image Designer Archive
Thread: New Gamer Girl: Big Butts, Butterfly Tattoos, & Blue Hair
Frankenpoodle wrote:
you know part of your article says.
Us guys are hopeless at giving advice on how you all look.... thats not true. most of us simply prefer living and getting sex more often than once per decade.
:rolleyes: /whisper You Fool they are not suppose to know that, you're going to blow it for all of us!
/LoudVoice He is crazy and I have no idea what he is talking about
, and by the way you ladies look great today ![]()
Hm…maybe if we can get Kwee bumped up from Correspondent to Dev… ![]()
One thing that occurred to me while reading the part about the hip:waist ratio—there's another, similar ratio governing leg:torso ratios that has been found to be almost universally appealing…we need to be able to modify that ratio too to fit all ranges of player interest
(Who knew I'd actually use something I learned in pursuing my degree in anthropology in image design?)
I was reading about a ratio used for all different parts of the body and face. It was 1 to 1.6 or something. There's a lot of interesting stuff out there if you do a web search on "biology of beauty"
Syzygy-Gorath wrote:
Hm…maybe if we can get Kwee bumped up from Correspondent to Dev…
One thing that occurred to me while reading the part about the hip:waist ratio—there's another, similar ratio governing leg:torso ratios that has been found to be almost universally appealing…we need to be able to modify that ratio too to fit all ranges of player interest
(Who knew I'd actually use something I learned in pursuing my degree in anthropology in image design?)
If you played a Trandoshan you would REALLY want sliders for thighs and calves
Kwee wrote:
Syzygy-Gorath wrote:
I'd really love to had sliders for thighs and calves too, but I'm guessing just hips/butts would be a tall orderWe can try!
NJ62 wrote:
Maybe it's just the cut of the hotpants, but that's not the most flattering outfit for a "big butt". I wonder what it would look like in a lux gown....
Thank you for a great article and leading me to yet another site I now enjoy frequently. In RL, I'm one of those girls that's never too thin (I look like death under 140lbs) but have always been muscular and told that I represent an attractiveness that is "real". (wonder what that means lol) I have an hourglass figure (sometimes a larger one that others,lol) but none the less I like the way I look. Now my Avatar on the other hand is a diff story. She is thin as most.. not set at 0 but probably around 10 on the weight. Full muscular and yet she still looks like a toothpick to me. I long for hips and even thighs to portray what in my opinion is a more healthful look.
And yes, it is extremely possible to have hips and muscularlegs (not powerlifter..mind you I'm usually at 145lbs)with a FLAT stomach. lol. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, yes. This is a game world, yes. However, I would love to put on a tacticle skinsuit and not look like someone's striped surfboard with floaties on top.
Thanks again girl!
ROFL
ZahrIna wrote:
I would love to put on a tacticle skinsuit and not look like someone's striped surfboard with floaties on top.
Kwee wrote:
I was reading about a ratio used for all different parts of the body and face. It was 1 to 1.6 or something. There's a lot of interesting stuff out there if you do a web search on "biology of beauty"
Syzygy-Gorath wrote:
Hm…maybe if we can get Kwee bumped up from Correspondent to Dev…
One thing that occurred to me while reading the part about the hip:waist ratio—there's another, similar ratio governing leg:torso ratios that has been found to be almost universally appealing…we need to be able to modify that ratio too to fit all ranges of player interest
(Who knew I'd actually use something I learned in pursuing my degree in anthropology in image design?)
I'd really love to had sliders for thighs and calves too, but I'm guessing just hips/butts would be a tall order
We can try!
I think the ratio was 1 to 1.618, i saw a movie on it in geometry class. The strange thing is, this ratio is found all over the body. The distance between the naval and the feet is 1.618 times greater than the distance from the naval to the head. The ratio is all over the face. This isn't true in every case, however, theoretically, if someone were to have 1.618 ratios all over the body they'd be mathematically gorgeous.
Here's a reference link to learn more about the Golden Ratio (Phi)http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/emt669/Student.Folders/Frietag.Mark/Homepage/Goldenratio/goldenratio.html
Message Edited by SWG-Runesabre on 02-19-2004 04:52 PM
Kwee wrote:
Please click on the link in my signature if you have some reading timeI did some modifications to Kwee in Microsoft Paint
sounds great Kwee!
also we mail Bothans really really really need more manly hairstyles!
thanks!