Force Sensitive Archive
Thread: heightened senses-medic convert macro needs help
Page 3 of 3
Galen111
Wed Jan 19, 2005 3:50 am
#27
It has nothing to do with me being jealous.. not in the least bit. I am master doctor, and have been for a very very long time. I don't want to see more nerfs added on because people take advantage of a system that is NOT meant to provide unattended advancements. Get your facts straight. This has been said by devs over a year ago.
Xerium1
Wed Jan 19, 2005 4:33 am
#28
It has nothing to do with me being jealous.. not in the least bit. I am master doctor, and have been for a very very long time. I don't want to see more nerfs added on because people take advantage of a system that is NOT meant to provide unattended advancements. Get your facts straight. This has been said by devs over a year ago.
...
There is nothing wrong with what the poster is doing.
The poster is reacting to a jedi grind system that is by nature, redundant and repetitive.
Justifications for flaming are pointless and tedious. If the devs choose to nerf your class, your issue should be with their inappropriate response to a broken system, rather than pointing fingers at people who choose to make the best of a system that is good only for developing carpel tunnel.
Particularly amusing are the posts (not including the immediately preceding one) that have as thebasis of theirargument: I've sweated through this damn system and now I expect you to do so as well!
LordScotticus
Thu Jan 20, 2005 3:39 pm
#29
Xerium1 wrote:Particularly amusing are the posts (not including the immediately preceding one) that have as the basis of their argument: I've sweated through this damn system and now I expect you to do so as well!
Exactly. It's the jealous response of someone who couldn't think outside of the box to someone who's trying to find a better way. They'll always deny it though; no point losing sleep over someone else's inadequacies about himself as a player.
I'd love to get into the discussion of "Is the Jedi path broken or is it not?" and proposed solutions, but that's not the topic of this thread (tempting though it is). To the original poster: I'm afraid you're just not going to get a straight answer about your macro because people aren't mature enough to see passed themselves to help you find one. At my last check through the *useful* posts way, way up towards the top of the thread, we were starting to have serious doubts about whether it's even possible to refer to a window option in a macro. I don't have the time at the moment to verify that, but if you're inclined to do so I hope I've helped you face in the right direction.
Good luck.
e3ApeXX
Fri Jan 21, 2005 4:30 pm
#30
LordScotticus wrote:
Xerium1 wrote:
Particularly amusing are the posts (not including the immediately preceding one) that have as the basis of their argument: I've sweated through this damn system and now I expect you to do so as well!
Exactly. It's the jealous response of someone who couldn't think outside of the box to someone who's trying to find a better way. They'll always deny it though; no point losing sleep over someone else's inadequacies about himself as a player.
I'd love to get into the discussion of "Is the Jedi path broken or is it not?" and proposed solutions, but that's not the topic of this thread (tempting though it is). To the original poster: I'm afraid you're just not going to get a straight answer about your macro because people aren't mature enough to see passed themselves to help you find one. At my last check through the *useful* posts way, way up towards the top of the thread, we were starting to have serious doubts about whether it's even possible to refer to a window option in a macro. I don't have the time at the moment to verify that, but if you're inclined to do so I hope I've helped you face in the right direction.
Good luck.
Maybe you aren't the most observant poster, but we already said that selecting a certain task or procedure in a spatial window through a macro at this time is impossible.
Thank you can a dev lock this thread?
deneric
Fri Jan 21, 2005 8:02 pm
#31
ok is it just me or is this a weird way of asking for help yea callin people names is a sure-fire way ofxpof gettin people to help ya!Now i have one question,this entire time i've been under the impression that ur trying to make a macro that just gives u the HS xp without really getting the xp like a(i'm not saying this will actually works it's just an example) /giveselfmedicxp 100000(just a number) /conv paemos /convertmedicxp 100000,is that what r tring to find?
Fremen_Feyadkin wrote:
Jeusu christ, what a bunch of crybabies ya'll are. The ranger post was the only one that stayed on topic. It probably would be a faster grind but like ya noticed, i don't really want to completely rework my template to do this tree. As for you jedi whiners, unplug for a bit because you obviously can't see the line between game and real life. I'm trying to stimulate some thought and all you guys can do is flame.
Message Edited by deneric on 01-21-2005 07:14 PM
Message Edited by deneric on 01-23-2005 10:09 AM
Terran_Riik
Sun Jan 23, 2005 9:58 am
#32
This is ridiculous... This grind is so ridiculous to do by hand... I plan on doing anything and everything in my power to get my way there.... fast... if this means being afk healing a tumbler next to paemos... I'll do it!!! There is a reason we have macroes!Why work when you dont have to? Its not being lazy its having a frickin life!!! I can't be on swg 24/7 because i have better things to do than sit at a cantina and healing people that come in with wounds. Is it cheap? maybe... Does it work? definately!
Page 3 of 3