Fencer Archive
Thread: Fencer Vs Swordsman , What is really better for PVP
Page 3 of 3
MasterPilot11
Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:34 am
#27
I have a Master Fencer and an alt thats nearing Master Swordsman. With my fencer i used to be able to own anyone, anywhere, however i felt like owning the person that day. Then stun armor and psg's came, and now i usually do about 10 damage with scatter2. With my fencer i still win a ton of duels, but i'm finding more and more that i get beaten because i can't damage them worth a can'o'beans.
My swordsman isn't a master yet, though i must say its quite fun working my way up
I have dueling a TKM, a master fencer, and a near master pikeman, i beat the pikeman, (but hey, what profession couldn't :smileywink
the TKM owned me (what a surprise :smileyhappy
and the fencer owned me as well.
As my fencer i can beat TKM's if they don't have 90% stun like most do with armor and psg's. PIkeman, i can beat everytime, no problem, hehe. Swordsman i've only lost once to, but i can almost always beat them.
I would say that fencer isbetter for pvp, though if everyone gets a set of stun armor and a crate or two of psg's, i think fencer will definitely not be the best any longer.
blindpathos
Thu Aug 05, 2004 4:10 pm
#28
IMO,I beat down Swordsman like nothing. I do have Master Brawler, which could be the reason, but I have no trouble at all taking down a Master Swordsman. But, when ever I where a full suit of Comp armor, my mind goes down WAY too fast. So, when ever dueling only armor I put on, most of the time, is a just my Comp Helm and Body peice. Anything else takes too much out of me. But, if I have full mind buffs(brandy, dancer, ect) I'm ok. Only thing I would say is, pick up Master Brawler. It's WAY worth the points.
Page 3 of 3