Fencer Archive

Thread: PLEASE PLEASE give Gad baton or ryyk blade AP PLEASE

WoodyX
Thu Apr 08, 2004 9:53 pm
#14

i dont wantttttttttttttttttttttttttt med AP. i just want one of our better weapons too have light AP. how you gonna give our weakest weapon AP. its NO better then useing a gad baton. no differnce at all!



SO why use a vibro blade when the gad baton dose the same amount of dmg. cause vibro blade are extremly weak.


MilleniX
Fri Apr 09, 2004 12:28 am
#15

I don't think it was ever the intent of the devs for fencers to take down mobs with level 3 armor. Nor do I think the devs should make it so we can... so what if swordsman fair well against those mobs, 1v1 vs swordsman, who has the advantage? mmhmm



_________________________________________________________

MilleniX : Bounty Hunter : Jedi
_________________________________________________________

"I have problems finishing things I..."


Impetuousyouth
Fri Apr 09, 2004 12:40 am
#16

I want my damage sliced acklaypower hammerto have 3.5 speed ohh and i want +5 range mods on the hammers as well, notto mention swordsman should have better defense i mean come on it's just not fair we can beat the crap out of high level creatures and npc's but we take a lot of damage we don't get stun weapons and the crappy range mods means i can't hit ppl with my ph in pvp.


variety is the spice of life, each prof has there own advantages and disadvantages you chose your prof on these.




Cronhour - REJEK

'If you can't get their respect make damn sure you have their fear'
Sutemek
Fri Apr 09, 2004 12:38 pm
#17

I dont think we need an ap weapon, the devs obviously need to nerf armor because it screws over far too many professions in the PvP department(namely everyone but riflemen/cms)



#Proud member of FINE#
#Imperia surgent et cadent, sed malus est aeturnitas.#
#Massa Fencer for life, back to the hologrind.#
JediQuic
Fri Apr 09, 2004 5:24 pm
#18






Sutemek wrote:

I dont think we need an ap weapon, the devs obviously need to nerf armor because it screws over far too many professions in the PvP department(namely everyone but riflemen/cms)







Ahemmm.....and fencers


But yeah, an Armor Revamp is Definitly called for

Sutemek
Sat Apr 10, 2004 1:57 am
#19

haha ya armor screws over fencers too. My friend has some 36% stun armor. I can't do crap to him because of the light armor. But jawa rifles have light ap. I've said it in another thread, stun armor is going to get very popular very soon it's already happening on the Tarquinas PvP scene.



#Proud member of FINE#
#Imperia surgent et cadent, sed malus est aeturnitas.#
#Massa Fencer for life, back to the hologrind.#
JediQuic
Sat Apr 10, 2004 3:14 am
#20

When you start hitting for less then a tenth of what you hit an unarmored target for then, i'll say yeah fencer is having "As much" of a problem as everyone else(With the exception of CM and Rilfemen).....



However i wasn't saying armor doesn't affect you at all...it does, it affects the Riflemen too......But Because the Highest stunn layerd Comp i've seen yet is Only 50%(And 3mil+ a peice) it doesn't hurt you quite as much as it hurts....say my scythe....or your Gaffie agains 90% kinetic resists(and probable Defensive stacking and mitigation bonuses...but everyone fightes agains those ).....Stun baton in combination with master fencer is still much better then vibro blade and M.Fencer....or Various other combinations



NERF COMPOSITE!

Logitition
Sat Apr 10, 2004 9:31 am
#21

There is a new thing on the market.. I personally wear a suit of compo that is 77-83% with 43% stun... on EVERY piece. Now that is not the kicker.. I use PSG's the current crop gives me 49% to stun and 40% to all other resists.. The only way to get through this is to have AP.. PSG's do not stop AP. Batons are useless on me. So are Genosian blasters it seems.


All Platemail at the time of gunplay became ribbed on the backside... hammers became obsolete.. look it up. All plate had gaps for movement.. the chainmail coif was used to protect the neck area as a prime example.... themajortarget was under the arms tho, because in order to swing the knight had to open up the mobility gap in the shoulders. Look it up.. I study weapon history.


Heavy swordsmen became extinct about the 1500's. And because of the rapier so did heavy armor. The armor after this point was reduced to a chestplate and helmet, I.E the Conquistadors and Swedish pikemen in the 1600's.


The Heavy swordsman in this game gets an AP weapon and well it fits trend, seeing as he is the mind pool hitting master of melee.


Fencers have alot of defence, this is true.. but they also have the lowest DPS of the melees also, and that is not due to the AP problem. Due to the high armor and buffs the health hit is not an option in pvp these days.. the scdatterhit is what gets used most cause it has a chance to hit the mind pool. Everyone may be getting AP2-3 weapons anyways it seems.. the armor has become so predominant that in order to do much damage u have to have an AP weapon and be able to target the mind. That is why the rifleman is getting so many AP weapons in each publish..


Uben Haum'Qui





g!g (()beh )(aum'jmi)\~
][][][][][][][][][][][][][]Imperial Servant of the People][][][][][][][[][][][][[][]
WoodyX
Sat Apr 10, 2004 1:00 pm
#22

Well for me, even if my oppent has 50% stunn protection. My stunn baton Genosian, RIPS right through it with no problem what SO EVER. i beat people into the ground with scatter hit 2, its still rather easy. but im not sure if it were 80% stunn protection then that might be a problem.




But when i use my gad baton 327 max 180 min, vs there 80% kinteic armor it dosent do anything at all, and it dose 3X times lower too med armor monsters. so its possible to hit in the 40 to 60 dmg rang. EVEN if we have a 450 max 250 min gad baton, we would hit no more then 200's or so vs med armor NPC or monsters!
Vincentarasin
Sat Apr 10, 2004 2:55 pm
#23






raldurrm wrote:

sorry but fencer should be heavy ap. in mid-evil times people stoped wearing armor because fencers could peirce through it and beat the heavy swordsman's with heavy armor. that is that.







Wrong entirly.



Fencing as it is did not exist in the midevil times, this is a relativly new concept enlightened by the fantesy of tuskins.



In the mid evil times, you had Mace wielders, or blade wielders, with a few exceptions.



A sword, (curved/rykk) was definatly not a "fencing" weapon by defination, it was a SWORDSMAN weapon.



the Vibroblade, could be considered a sword I guess, but to my knowldge a sword needs length, more then piddly 9inchs or whatever the vibro is, I would classify the vibro as a dagger, which was fight with as a sword weapon, and/or a stab-type-weapon.



In the mid evil times, heavy swordsman would have been dominated, sure they can slap a sword on you harder, but a truly skilled weapon-master could parry that attack with a one-handed sword with much greater ease, as well as use a second weapon, or a sheild. The two-hander would tire, due to the increased weight of the sword and of the ammount of energy used in both arms, compared to one.



Now this isnt to say that polearms and the like did not exist, they did, the Lance and the Pike/spear show this, but thats a different concept entirly.



Now, eariler I stated Mace users, lets be clear, a POWERHAMMER is not a mace, in midevil terms, to my knowledge a weapon such as that did not exist period, however one called a War-hammer did, which was essentially a small malet, with a cylynder-type metal thinggy on the end, not very effective though. Macers, by my knowledge, used mainly (enlightened for easy understanding of those that can not visualize) a Pipe, with a Spiked ball on the end. Or, a Pipe, with a foot long chain attatched to one end, with, at the end of that chain, a spiked ball.




Vincent' Arasin
______________________

First Master Fencer of Bria
______________________
(ggggggggggggggg9WXnnln[[[[nnnn}}}}nlnnWX9ggggggggggggggggg)
Logitition
Sat Apr 10, 2004 4:23 pm
#24

Umm, hate to say it but the 'medievil time period' ends at the 1300 mark.. or so determined by many historians


Plate mail as u see it in lets say, the movie Excalibre was not around till about 1375.. widely it was not around till about 1430..


columbus sailed in 1492 and as stated by the quote '1500's' instead of using the term 14th century.. don't see how u construed it as medievil..


Take the movie Braveheart.. it is set in the 1350's and all of the armor that the english is wearing is pretty much in error besides the padded and chain mail.. and chain mail was hard to come by since they had not even came across the idea of 'wire' at that time.. all suits of chain had to have the rings individually made. There was a troop of Templars that actually helped the man william wallace win in 2 of those battles.. they made scotland a home after the pope chased them from their castles because he wanted their holdings.. this also was after the saracens took the holy land back. these guys were reported to have a few suits of chainmail with minor pieces of plate attached to it. - I say this because they are the ones that inspired the grail myths and that is what the movie Excalibre was taken from.


As to the weapons.. well I dunno what SOE is doing.. but I know what a fencer was.. and in case u did not know.. the rapier is NOT a foil.. a foil bends where as a rapier's bladeis about 2-3 inches wide at the hilt.


Pikes seen alot of use through all of this, they are just really good against charging horses in any time.. lol


The germans were the first to rib plate therby increasing its strength against warhammers, flails, morning stars, maces, picks.. Best most could do against it was get the knight on his back and off of his horse, because at that point a knight could not get up off of his back due to the weight. Sure there were those knights who dismounted to fight on foot.. but they wore lighter armor.



Uben Haum'Qui





g!g (()beh )(aum'jmi)\~
][][][][][][][][][][][][][]Imperial Servant of the People][][][][][][][[][][][][[][]
JediQuic
Sat Apr 10, 2004 4:56 pm
#25

Heh, as far as the debate of Fencer vs. Swordsmen(in history)...there is no clear cut "Who wins" answer.


You take a run of the mill pesant and give him a one handed long sword and shield and i'll find a run of the mill swordsmen who used a heavier 2 handed blade such as a claymore that will kill him in one strike. By the same token, given that swordsmen, i could find a professional fencer(such as a musketeer as seem in movies) who uses a very light and fast one handed sword(rapier...sure) that could easily destroy the earlier example of a 2 handed swordsmen. Then again i could find a Iaido Master Who would Destroy the the Fencer from the musketeer movie in one attack....Ect....Then i could find JetLi (as he is portrayed in the movies) and he would own them all while making it look extreemly cool.


I've Prcticed many facets of martial arts and a large number of weapons styles....Skill > All else. The weapon and sizehas very littleto do with it if you know how to use it(Generaly the Exception is weapon Quality). A guy with a lance has an Equal chance against an unarmed+unarmored opponent as does the opposite if they are both equaly skilled.




Anyhow, This is a Game discussion....not the history channel.....
Logitition
Sat Apr 10, 2004 9:37 pm
#26

Uh, that is all nice and dandy.. but....


We were talking about the fencer and what made a fencer a fencer, which I carried into his weapon and piercing armor as that said definition.



A machinegunner could kill a samauri.. but that was never the topic..



Uben Haum'qui






g!g (()beh )(aum'jmi)\~
][][][][][][][][][][][][][]Imperial Servant of the People][][][][][][][[][][][][[][]
Page 2 of 3