Entertainer Archive
Thread: A counterpoint for the AFK debate (devs please read)
Page 4 of 4
Tiaga
Fri Aug 20, 2004 11:35 am
#40
Well it's the devs that made the announcement that they wanted to end unattended gameplay.
Vyko
Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:45 am
#41
Forgive me for saying so, but as I posted in my "Wow..." thread...
I like using the buff bots... for buffing. Not to heal wounds, not to reduce BF, but for buffs. Why? Because at least on Kettemore, on Coronet and Theed, it's nearly impossible to get any ATK players to take the time to buff. Most of the cantinas on my server are seas of AFK tags. Tonight alone, I asked 4 human players with Master Dancer tags if they'd be willing to buff, and each of them said, "No, I'm grinding Musician."
Why do I prefer the buff-bots?
They're readily available and they never blow you off. Reliable, quick, and easy.
But again, as I said, if there's a human player that's ATK for me to give XP or money to for heals or BF work, I'll do that first in a minute.
*shrug* My $0.02
I like using the buff bots... for buffing. Not to heal wounds, not to reduce BF, but for buffs. Why? Because at least on Kettemore, on Coronet and Theed, it's nearly impossible to get any ATK players to take the time to buff. Most of the cantinas on my server are seas of AFK tags. Tonight alone, I asked 4 human players with Master Dancer tags if they'd be willing to buff, and each of them said, "No, I'm grinding Musician."
Why do I prefer the buff-bots?
They're readily available and they never blow you off. Reliable, quick, and easy.
But again, as I said, if there's a human player that's ATK for me to give XP or money to for heals or BF work, I'll do that first in a minute.
*shrug* My $0.02
Page 4 of 4